Incorporation of Flavonoid Derivatives or Pentagalloyl Glucose into Lignin Enhances Cell Wall Saccharification Following Mild Alkaline or Acidic Pretreatments
Partial substitution of normal monolignols with phenolic precursors from other metabolic pathways may improve the susceptibility of lignified biomass to chemical pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification for biofuel production. Flavonoids and gallate esters readily undergo oxidative coupling reactions, suggesting they could serve as alternate monomers for forming lignin in plants. To test this premise, primary cell walls of Zea mays (L.) were artificially lignified with normal monolignols plus various flavan-3-ol/phenolic ester derivatives, flavonol glycoside/gallate ester derivatives, or pentagalloyl glucose added as 0 or 45 % of the precursor mixture. Most alternate monomers readily copolymerized with normal monolignols, but wall-bound lignin was most efficiently formed with epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, epigallocatechin gallate, or hyperoside. Yields of glucose from a high-throughput digestibility platform were used to examine how lignin modifications affected the susceptibility of cell walls to enzymatic hydrolysis following alkaline or acidic pretreatments of different severities. With the exception of hyperoside, incorporation of alternate monomers into lignin improved yields of enzymatically released glucose by 18–60 % after mild alkaline pretreatment and by 6–34 % after mild acid pretreatment. Responses due to lignin modification diminished as pretreatment severity increased. Overall, our results suggest that apoplastic deposition of pentagalloyl glucose or gallated flavan-3-ols such as epicatechin gallate or epigallocatechin gallate for incorporation into lignin could be promising plant genetic engineering targets for improving sugar yields from grass biomass crops that are subjected to low-temperature alkaline pretreatments.
KeywordsMonolignols Genetic engineering Pretreatment Enzymatic hydrolysis Cellulosic biofuel
This work was funded by Stanford University’s Global Climate and Energy Project (GCEP) and by USDA-ARS in-house funds. CF, NS, and JR were funded by the DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science DE-FC02-07ER64494). The authors thank Novozymes (Franklinton, NC) for generously providing enzymes for this research. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
- 9.Pilate G, Dejardin A, Leple JC (2012) Field trials with lignin-modified transgenic trees. In: Jouanin L, Lapierre C (eds) Adv Bot Res, Vol 61 Elsevier Ltd, pp 2–36Google Scholar
- 14.Ralph J (2006) What makes a good monolignol substitute? In: Hayashi T (ed) The science and lore of the plant cell wall. Biosynthesis, structure and function. BrownWalker Press, Boca Raton, pp 285–293Google Scholar
- 27.Foster CE, Martin TM, Pauly M (2010) Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (lignocellulosic biomass) Part I: Lignin. http://www.jove.com/details.php?id=1745
- 28.Foster CE, Martin TM, Pauly M (2010) Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (lignocellulosic biomass) Part II: Carbohydrates. http://www.jove.com/details.php?id=1837
- 32.SAS (2010) PC windows version 9.2. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
- 33.Saxton AM (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in proc mixed. Proc 23rd SAS Users Group Intl, SAS Institute, Cary NC, pp 1243–1246Google Scholar
- 34.Piepho HP, Williams ER, Fleck M (2006) A note on the analysis of designed experiments with complex treatment structure. Hortscience 41:446–452Google Scholar