Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Fertilizer potential of thin stillage from wheat-based ethanol production

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 15 March 2015

Abstract

Accumulation of thin stillage (TS), a byproduct resulting from ethanol production, has led to a need to explore all possible means of its utilization. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of TS derived from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-based ethanol production plant as a fertilizer. The experiment was conducted over a 2-year period in east-central Saskatchewan, Canada. Treatments included three rates of TS: 50, 100, and 200 kg N ha−1 using two methods of application: broadcast, and incorporation and injection. For comparison, conventional fertilizer urea (46-0-0) was applied at the same rates of N as the TS. Responses of crop yield (wheat and canola (Brassica napus L.), N and P uptake, and apparent N recovery were measured over two growing seasons on a Black Chernozemic soil. For both seasons, at equivalent N rate, the TS produced similar or greater crop yield and nutrient recovery compared to urea fertilizer, especially when injected. This is caused by the presence of other plant nutrients, such as P and S in TS, and its relatively high plant-available NH4 +-N content. The injection of TS appears to be a more effective application method compared to broadcasting, likely through reducing volatile N loss and placing nutrients closer to the growing crop roots when injected in bands in soil. The TS did not show any adverse effect on measured crop parameters even at the high rate of application. The results of this study suggest that land application of TS can be an effective solution for TS management that recycles nutrients in the feedstock grain for the ethanol production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Wilkie AC, Riedesel KJ, Owens JM (2000) Stillage characterization and anaerobic treatment of ethanol stillage from conventional and cellulosic feedstocks. Biomass Bioenergy 19:63–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonnardeaux J (2007) Potential uses for distillers grains [Avilabe at: http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/content/sust/biofuel/potentialusesgrains042007.pdf. Virified January 24, 2011. Department of Agriculture and Food, Government of Western Australia, 15

  3. van Haandel AC, Catunda PFC (1994) Profitability increase of alcohol distilleries by the rational use of byproducts. Water Sci Technol 29:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faust U, Prave P, Schlingmann M (1983) An integral approach to power alcohol. Process Biochem 18:31–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mustafa AF, McKinnon JJ, Christensen DA (2000) The nutritive value of thin stillage and wet distillers' grains for ruminants: A review. Asian‐Austral. J Anim Sci 13:1609–1618

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rausch KD, Belyea RL (2006) The future of coproducts from corn processing. Appl Biochem Biotech 128:47–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alotaibi KD, Schoenau JJ (2012a) Biofuel production byproducts as soil amendments. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Organic fertilization, soil quality and human health. Vol 9. Springer, pp 67–91

  8. Cardona CA, Sánchez ÓJ (2007) Fuel ethanol production: Process design trends and integration opportunities. Bioresour Technol 98:2415–2457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. España-Gamboa E, Mijangos-Cortes J, Barahona-Perez L, Dominguez-Maldonado J, Hernandez-Zarate G, Alzate-Gaviria L (2011) Vinasses: characterization and treatments. Waste Manag Res 29:1235–1250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gemtos TA, Chouliaras N, Marakis S (1999) Vinasse Rate, time of application and compaction effect on soil properties and durum wheat crop. J Agric Eng Res 73:283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh AB, Biswas AK, Pamana S (2003) Effect of distillery effluents on plant and soil enzymatic activities and groundnut quality. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 166:345–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Resende AS, Xavier RP, Oliveira OC, Urquiaga S, Alves BJR, Boddey RM (2006) Long-term effects of pre-harvest burning and nitrogen and vinasse applications on yield of sugar cane and soil carbon and nitrogen stocks on a plantation in pernambuco, N E Brazil. Plant Soil 281:339–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hati K, Biswas A, Bandyopadhyay K, Misra A (2007) Soil properties and crop yields on a vertisol in India with application of distillery effluent. Soil Tillage Res 92:60–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iotaibi KD, Schoenau JJ (2011) Enzymatic activity and microbial biomass in soil amended with biofuel production byproducts. Appl Soil Ecol 48:227–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Qian P, Schoenau J, Urton R (2011) Effect of soil amendment with thin stillage and glycerol on plant growth and soil properties. J Plant Nutr 34:2206–2221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Alotaibi KD, Schoenau JJ (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient supply rates in soil amended with biofuel production by-products. Biol Fertil Soils 49:129–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986) Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A (ed) Method of soil analysis. Part I-Physical and mineralogical methods, 2nd edn. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stumborg C, Schoenau JJ, Malhi SS (2007) Nitrogen balance and accumulation pattern in three contrasting prairie soils receiving repeated applications of liquid swine and solid cattle manure. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas RL, Sheard RW, Moyer JR (1967) Comparision of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron J 59:240–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Technicon Industrial Systems (1978) Ammonium in water and seawater. Industrial Method 154–71 W/B Technicon Industrial Systems, Tarrytown

  21. Bechini L, Marino P (2009) Short-term nitrogen fertilizing value of liquid dairy manures is mainly due to ammonium. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73:2159–2169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pratt PF, Broadbent FE, Martin JP (1973) Using organic wastes as fertilizers. Calif Agric 27:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paul JW, Beauchamp EG (1993) Nitrogen availability for corn in soils amended with urea, cattle slurry, and solid and composted manures. Can J Soil Sci 73:253–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eghball B, Power JF (1999) Phosphorus- and nitrogen-based manure and compost applications: Corn production and soil phosphorus. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:895–901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mooleki SP, Schoenau JJ, Charles JL, Wen G (2004) Effect of rate, frequency and incorporation of feedlot cattle manure on soil nitrogen availability, crop performance and nitrogen use efficiency in east central Saskatchewan. Can J Soil Sci 84:199–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. N'Dayegamiye A, Huard S, Thibault Y (2003) Influence of paper mill sludges on corn yields and N recovery. Can J Soil Sci 83:497–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N'Dayegamiye A (2006) Mixed Paper Mill Sludge Effects on Corn Yield, Nitrogen Efficiency, and Soil Properties. Agron J 98:1471–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jenkins JW, Sweeten JM, Reddell DL (1987) Land application of thin stillage from a grain sorghum feedstock. Biomass 14:245–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Malhi SS, Grant CA, Angers DA, Johnston AM, Schoenau JJ, Drury CF (2008) Integrated nutrient management: Experience and concepts from Canada. In: Aulakh CGM (ed) Integrated nutrient management for sustainable crop production. Haworth Press, New York, pp 123–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Qian P, Schoenau JJ, Karamanos RE (1994) Simultaneous extraction of available phosphorus and potassium with a new test: A modification of Kelowna extraction. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25:627–636

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Qian P, Schoenau JJ (2000) Use of ion exchange membrane to assess soil N supply to canola as affected by addition of liquid swine manure and urea. Can J Soil Sci 80:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Paul JW, Zebarth BJ (1997) Denitrification during the growing season following dairy cattle slurry and fertilizer application for silage corn. Can J Soil Sci 77:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gagnon B, Ziadi N, Grant C (2012) Urea fertilizer forms affect grain corn yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Can J Soil Sci 92:341–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eghball B, Sander DH (1989) Band spacing effects of dual-placed nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on corn. Agron J 81:178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller JJ, Beasley BW, Drury CF, Zebarth BJ (2009) Barley yield and nutrient uptake for soil amended with fresh and composted cattle manure. Agron J 101:1047–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Huijsmans J, Hol JMG, Vermeulen GD (2003) Effect of application method, manure characteristics, weather and field conditions on ammonia volatilization from manure applied to arable land. Atmos Environ 37:3669–3680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support of the Feed Opportunities from Biofuels program and the Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund is greatly appreciated. Field and lab assistance provided by Tom King and Cory Fatteicher during the course of this study is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada

    Khaled D. Alotaibi & Jeff. J. Schoenau

  2. Department of Soil Science, King Saud University, Box 2460, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia

    Khaled D. Alotaibi

  3. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, Environmental Health, 5403-1st Ave, South, Lethbridge, AB, T1J4B1, Canada

    Xiying Hao

Authors
  1. Khaled D. Alotaibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeff. J. Schoenau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiying Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaled D. Alotaibi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alotaibi, K.D., Schoenau, J.J. & Hao, X. Fertilizer potential of thin stillage from wheat-based ethanol production. Bioenerg. Res. 7, 1421–1429 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9473-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-014-9473-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation