Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving Woody Biomass Feedstock Logistics by Reducing Ash and Moisture Content

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined two practical methods for reducing moisture content and/or ash content in biomass from southern pine harvests. Logging residues are a potential bioenergy feedstock, but contaminants can increase ash content during collection. We found that trommel screens can reduce ash levels in grindings from southern pine roundwood and clean chipped logging residues from 4.0 to 1.4 % and 11.9 to 6 %, respectively. Green whole-tree chips are a widely used form of forest biomass, but are 50 % moisture. Felling and transpirationally drying in-field before chipping reduced moisture from 53 to 43 % and 39 % in 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, without changing ash content (<0.7 %). Finally, we used data from the screening and drying studies in a simulation study to estimate delivered costs for whole-tree chipping and screened and unscreened grinders processing logging and clean chip residue. Whole-tree chipping provided the lowest cost option at ash content levels less than 1 %, and unscreened grinding of clean chip residue produced the least expensive option at 5 % ash.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RISI (2013) Wood biomass market report, vol 6(3). Bedford, MA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aguilar F, Garrett HE (2009) Perspectives of woody biomass for energy: survey of state foresters, state energy biomass contacts, and National Council of Forestry Association Executives. J Forest 107(6):297–306

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sarenbo S (2009) Wood ash dilemma—reduced quality due to poor combustion performance. Biomass Bioenergy 33(9):1212–1220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pettersson M, Nordfjell T (2007) Fuel quality changes during seasonal storage of compacted logging residues and young trees. Biomass Bioenergy 31(11–12):782–792. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stokes BJ, McDonald TP, Kelley T (1993) Transpirational drying and costs for transporting woody biomass—a preliminary review. Proceedings of IEA/BA Task IX. Aberdeen, UK

  6. Dukes C (2012) In-wood screening of wood grindings for biomass feedstock applications. University of Georgia, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cutshall JB (2012) Options for reducing moisture and ash content in forest biomass harvesting systems. University of Georgia, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cutshall JB, Greene D, Baker SA (In Press) Transpirational drying effects on energy and ash content from whole-tree southern pine plantation chipping operations. South J Appl For.

  9. Dukes CC, Baker SA, Greene WD (2013) In-wood grinding and screening of forest residues for biomass feedstock applications. Biomass Bioenergy 54(0):18–26. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. TAPPI (1985) Sampling and preparing wood for analysis. vol T257 cm-85

  11. Baker SA, Westbrook MD, Greene WD (2010) Evaluation of integrated harvesting systems in pine stands of the southern United States. Biomass Bioenergy 34(5):720–727. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ott LR, Longnecker MT (2001) An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis. Duxbury/Thomson Learning

  13. Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley series in probability and statistics, 2nd edn. J. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miyata ES (1980) Determining fixed and operating costs of logging equipment. North Central Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, [Saint Paul, Minn.]

  15. Fender KJ, Pierce DA (2011) An analysis of the operational costs of trucking: a 2011 update. American Transportation Research Institute, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  16. Young TM, Domenech DW, Ostermeier DM (1988) Average wood chip trucking costs for the southeastern United States. South J Appl For 12(4):267–269

    Google Scholar 

  17. White MS, Curtis ML, Sarles RL, Green DW (1983) Effects of outside storage on the energy potential of hardwood particulate fuels: part 1. Moisture content and temperature. For Prod J 33(6):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thörnqvist T (1985) Drying and storage of forest residues for energy production. Biomass 7(2):125–134. doi:10.1016/0144-4565(85)90038-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Phanphanich M, Mani S (2009) Drying characteristics of pine forest resources. BioResour 5(1):13

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aman AL, Baker SA, Greene WD (2011) Productivity and product quality measures for chippers and grinders on operational southern US timber harvests. Int J For Eng 22(2):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Patterson DW, Hartley JI, Pelkki MH (2011) Size, moisture content, and British thermal unit value of processed in-woods residues: five case studies. For Prod J 61(4):316–320

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baker SA, Greene WD, Wilson A (2012) Fuels characteristics of woods-run whole tree southern pine chips. Biomass Bioenergy 37(0):67–72. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.12.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aman AL (2010) An evaluation of alternate forest biomass harvesting methods. University of Georgia, Athens

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by financial support from the Southeastern Sun Grant Center associated with the US Department of Energy and US Department of Agriculture.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn A. Baker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greene, W.D., Cutshall, J.B., Dukes, C.C. et al. Improving Woody Biomass Feedstock Logistics by Reducing Ash and Moisture Content. Bioenerg. Res. 7, 816–823 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9404-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9404-6

Keywords

Navigation