Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Greenhouse Gas Balance of a Dairy Farm as Influenced by the Uptake of Biogas Production

BioEnergy Research volume 7, pages 95–109 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

The production of energy crops for farm-scale anaerobic digestion (AD) can affect emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) in a number of ways. Some examples are: fugitive CH4 emissions from the digester and the storage of the digestate, emissions of N2O from soil and emissions of CO2 from farm machinery. Moreover, uptake of AD may be accompanied by changes in the way the farm is operated, which may affect GHG emissions. The scale of these emissions was assessed from published data for the biogas feedstocks cattle slurry and grass silage. Emissions were compared to references representing current farm operation and energy generation by fossil fuels. Feeding the digester with cattle slurry for the entire year did not result in reduced emissions due to relatively high emissions from stored raw slurry in summer. If grass was used for digester feedstock, the level of N2O emissions from the crop was the most important factor for the GHG balance of farm-scale AD. If N2O emissions were low, biogas realised substantial savings of GHG in the order of 1 t CO2 equivalents per hectare per year. At a high level of N2O emissions, energy cropping might even result in increased GHG emissions compared to fossil fuels.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Rogner H, Zhou D, Bradley R, Crabbé P, Edenhofer O, Hare B, Kuijpers L, Yamguchi M (2007) Introduction. In: Metz B, Davidson O, Bosch P, Dave R, Meyer L (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 95–116

    Google Scholar 

  2. EPA (2010) Ireland’s greenhouse gas emissions projections 2010–2020. Wexford

  3. Braun R (2007) Anaerobic digestion: a multi-faceted process for energy, environmental management and rural development. In: Ranalli P (ed) Improvement of crop plants for industrial end uses. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 335–416

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiland P (2006) Biomass digestion in agriculture: a successful pathway for the energy production and waste treatment in Germany. Eng Life Sci 6:302–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gemmeke B, Rieger C, Weiland P, Schröder J, Plogsties V, Kissel R, Bachmaier H, Vogtherr J, Schumacher B (2009) Biogas-Messprogramm II. vTI Institut für Agrartechnologie und Biosystemtechnik, Braunschweig

  6. Liebetrau J, Clemens J, Cuhls C, Hafermann C, Friehe J, Weiland P, Daniel-Gromke J (2010) Methane emissions from biogas-producing facilities within the agricultural sector. Eng Life Sci 10:595–599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey D, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe D, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M, van Dorland R (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–234

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sims R (2003) Bioenergy to mitigate for climate change and meet the needs of society, the economy and the environment. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 8:349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dieterich B (2011) The energy potential and greenhouse gas balance of biogas production from grass in Ireland. University College Dublin, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elsayed M, Matthews R, Mortimer N (2003) Carbon and energy balances for a range of biofuels options. Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Amon T, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2006) Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:153–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sommer S, Petersen S, Sogaard H (2000) Greenhouse gas emission from stored livestock slurry. J Environ Qual 29:744–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wulf S, Maeting M, Clemens J (2002) Application technique and slurry co-fermentation effects on ammonia, nitrous oxide, and methane emissions after spreading: II Greenhouse gas emissions. J Environ Qual 31:1795–1801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crutzen P, Mosier A, Smith K, Winiwarter W (2008) N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos Chem Phys 8:389–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Mara F (2006) Climate change—development of emission factors for the Irish cattle herd EPA. Wexford, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  16. Granli T, BØckman O (1994) Nitrous oxide from agriculture. Nor J Agric Sci Suppl 12:128

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Klein C, Sherlock R, Cameron K, Van der Weerden T (2001) Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils in New Zealand—a review of current knowledge and directions for future research. J Roy Soc NZ 31:543–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Petersen S (1999) Nitrous oxide emissions from manure and inorganic fertilizers applied to spring barley. J Environ Qual 28:1610–1618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dalgaard T, Halberg N, Porter J (2001) A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ 87:51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dillon P, Hennessy T, Shalloo L, Thorne F, Horan B (2008) Future outlook for the Irish dairy industry: a study of international competitiveness, influence of international trade reform and requirement for change. Int J Dairy Technol 61:16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Creighton P, Kennedy E, Shalloo L, Boland T, O’Donovan M (2011) A survey analysis of grassland dairy farming in Ireland, investigating grassland management, technology adoption and sward renewal. Grass Forage Sci 66:251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Treacy M, Humphreys J, McNamara K, Browne R, Watson C (2008) Farm-gate nitrogen balances on intensive dairy farms in the south west of Ireland. Irish J Agric Food Res 47:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  23. Möller K, Stinner W (2009) Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on soil mineral nitrogen content and on gaseous nitrogen losses (ammonia, nitrous oxides). Eur J Agron 30:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wulf S, Maeting M, Clemens J (2002) Application technique and slurry co-fermentation effects on ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions after spreading: I Ammonia volatilization. J Environ Qual 31:1789–1794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baumann H, Tillman A (2004) The hitch hiker’s guide to LCA. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frost P, Gilkinson S (2010) First year performance summary for anaerobic digestion of dairy cow slurry at AFBI Hillsborough. Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, NI, Hillsborough

    Google Scholar 

  27. Connolly L, Kinsella A, Quinlan G, Moran B (2010) National Farm Survey 2009. Teagasc Farm Surveys Department, Athenry

  28. Hyde B, Carton O, Murphy W (2006) Farm facilities survey—Ireland 2003. Teagasc, Wexford

    Google Scholar 

  29. Carton O, Magett W (1999) Land spreading of animal manures, farm wastes & non-agricultural organic wastes Part 1. Manure (and other organic wastes) management guidelines for intensive agricultural enterprises. Rural Environmental Series. Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford, Ireland

  30. Coulter B, Lalor S, Alexander S, Black A, Boland A, Burke J, Carton O, Culleton N, Dillon P, Hackett R, Humphreys J, Keady T, McHoul J, Merfield C, Murphy B, O’Kiely P, O’Riordan E, Orlovius K, Plunkett M, Schulte R, Tunney H (2008) Major and micro nutrient advice for productive agricultural crops, 3rd edn. Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford

    Google Scholar 

  31. McEniry J, O’Kiely P, Clipson N, Forristal P, Doyle E (2006) The microbiological and chemical composition of baled and precision-chop silages on a sample of farms in county Meath. Irish J Agric Food Res 45:73–83

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bachmaier J, Effenberger M, Gronauer A (2010) Greenhouse gas balance and resource demand of biogas plants in agriculture. Eng Life Sci 10:560–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Scholwin F, Michel J, Schröder G, Kalies M (2006) Ökologische Analyse einer Biogasnutzung aus nachwachsenden Rohstoffen. Institut für Energetik und Umwelt, Leipzig

  34. Eder B, Schulz H (2007) Biogas Praxis. 4 edn. Ökobuch, Staufen bei Freiburg

  35. Dachs G, Rehm W, Eberl S, Horschak G, Schilling J (2006) Der Eigenstromverbrauch von Biogasanlagen und Potenziale zu dessen Reduzierung. BASE Technologies Munich University of Applied Sciences, Munich

  36. Martínez-Suller L, Provolo G, Carton O, Brennan D, Kirwan L, Richards K (2010) The composition of dirty water on dairy farms in Ireland. Irish J Agric Food Res 49:67–80

    Google Scholar 

  37. Finch H, Samuel A, Lane G (2002) Lockhart & Wiseman’s crop husbandry, 8th edn. Woodhead, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Prochnow A, Heiermann M, Plöchl M, Linke B, Idler C, Amon T, Hobbs P (2009) Bioenergy from permanent grassland—a review: 1. Biogas. Bioresour Technol 100:4931–4944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Møller H, Sommer S, Ahring B (2004) Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 26:485–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Karpenstein-Machan M (2005) Energiepflanzenbau für Biogasanlagenbetreiber. DLG, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tambone F, Scaglia B, D’Imporzano G, Schievano A, Orzi V, Salati S, Adani F (2010) Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. Chemosphere 81:577–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sørensen P, Møller H (2009) Fate of nitrogen in pig and cattle slurries applied to the soil-crop system. In: Adani F, Schievano A, Boccasile G (eds) Anaerobic digestion: opportunities for agriculture and environment. University of Milan, Milan, pp 27–37

    Google Scholar 

  43. BHKW-Forum Die BHKW-Infothek (2013) Accessed 19 May

  44. Amon B, Moitzi G, Schimpl M, Kryvoruchko V, Wagner-Alt C (2002) Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions from management of liquid manures (trans: Institut für Land-UuE). Universität für Bodenkultur Wien, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sommer S, Petersen S, Moller H (2004) Algorithms for calculating methane and nitrous oxide emissions from manure management. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 69:143–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dinuccio E, Berg W, Balsari P (2008) Gaseous emissions from the storage of untreated slurries and the fractions obtained after mechanical separation. Atmos Environ 42:2448–2459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Chadwick D, Pain B, Brookman S (2000) Nitrous oxide and methane emissions following application of animal manures to grassland. J Environ Qual 29:277–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sherlock R, Sommer S, Khan R, Wood C, Guertal E, Freney J, Dawson C, Cameron K (2002) Ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide emission from pig slurry applied to a pasture in New Zealand. J Environ Qual 31:1491–1501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Dieterich B, Finnan J, Frost P, Gilkinson S, Müller C (2012) The extent of methane (CH4) emissions after fertilisation of grassland with digestate. Biol Fertil Soil 48:981–985

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Møller H, Sommer S, Ahring B (2004) Biological degradation and greenhouse gas emissions during pre-storage of liquid animal manure. J Environ Qual 33:27–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Flessa H, Ruser R, Dörsch P, Kamp T, Jimenez M, Munch J, Beese F (2002) Integrated evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agric Ecosyst Environ 91:175–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Sommer S, Genermont S, Cellier P, Hutchings N, Olesen J, Morvan T (2003) Processes controlling ammonia emission from livestock slurry in the field. Eur J Agron 19:465–486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. De Klein C, Novoa R, Ogle S, Smith K, Rochette P, Wirth T, McConkey B, Mosier A, Rypdal K, Walsh M, Williams S (2006) N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application. In: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, pp .11.11–11.54

  54. Anon (2006) S.I. 378 of 2006, European Communities (Good Agricultural Practice for Protection of Waters) Regulations 2006

  55. McSwiney C, Robertson G (2005) Nonlinear response of N2O flux to incremental fertilizer addition in a continuous maize (Zea mays L.) cropping system. Glob Chang Biol 11:1712–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zebarth B, Rochette P, Burton D (2008) N2O emissions from spring barley production as influenced by fertilizer nitrogen rate. Can J Soil Sci 88:197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Cardenas LM, Thorman R, Ashlee N, Butler M, Chadwick D, Chambers B, Cuttle S, Donovan N, Kingston H, Lane S, Dhanoa MS, Scholefield D (2010) Quantifying annual N2O emission fluxes from grazed grassland under a range of inorganic fertiliser nitrogen inputs. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:218–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Rafique R, Hennessy D, Kiely G (2011) Nitrous oxide emission from grazed grassland under different management systems. Ecosystems 14:563–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Fruergaard T, Astrup T, Ekvall T (2009) Energy use and recovery in waste management and implications for accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Manage Res 27:724–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Styles D, Jones M (2007) Energy crops in Ireland: an assessment of their potential contribution to sustainable agriculture, electricity and heat production. EPA, Wexford, Johnstown Castle

    Google Scholar 

  61. Galloway J, Aber J, Erisman J, Seitzinger S, Howarth R, Cowling E, Cosby B (2003) The nitrogen cascade. BioScience 53:341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dobbie K, Smith K (2003) Impact of different forms of N fertilizer on N2O emissions from intensive grassland. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 67:37–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Clayton H, Mc Taggart I, Parker J, Swan L, Smith K (1997) Nitrous oxide emission from fertilised grassland: a 2-year study of the effects of fertiliser form and environmental conditions. Biol Fertil Soil 25:252–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Grant R, Pattey E, Goddard T, Kryzanowski L, Puurveen H (2006) Modeling the effects of fertilizer application rate on nitrous oxide emissions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:235–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Van Groenigen J, Velthof G, Oenema O, Van Groenigen K, Van Kessel C (2010) Towards an agronomic assessment of N2O emissions: a case study for arable crops. Eur J Soil Sci 61:903–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Fowler D, Skiba U, Hargreaves KJ (1997) Emissions of nitrous oxide from grasslands. In: Jarvis S, Pain B (eds) Gaseous nitrogen emissions from grasslands. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 147–162

    Google Scholar 

  67. Weiland P (2010) Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:849–860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Anon (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources

  69. Banks C, Salter A, Chesshire M (2007) Potential of anaerobic digestion for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and production of renewable energy from agriculture: barriers and incentives to widespread adoption in Europe. Water Sci Technol 55(10):165–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This investigation was part of a larger research project financed by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food of the Republic of Ireland (Research Stimulus Programme, RSF 07-506). The authors would furthermore like to express their gratitude to the following experts for sharing their knowledge with us in the course of the writing of this paper: Dr. Barbara Amon (University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria), Dr. Owen Carton (Teagasc, Oak Park, Ireland), Mr. Dermot Forristal (Teagasc, Oak Park), Dr. Peter Frost (AFBINI, Hillsborough, Northern Ireland), Mr. Stephen Gilkinson (AFBINI, Hillsborough), Dr. Trevor Gilliland (AFBINI, Crossnacreevy, Northern Ireland), Dr. Andreas Lemmer (State Agency for Agricultural Engineering and Bioenergy, University of Hohenheim, Germany), Dr. Joseph McEniry (Teagasc, Grange, Ireland), Mr. Jörg Messner (LAZBW, Aulendorf, Germany) and Dr. Padraig O’Kiely (Teagasc, Grange).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biology and Environmental Science, Belfield, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Burkart Dieterich, Tamara Hochstrasser & Christoph Müller

  2. Teagasc, Oak Park, Carlow, Ireland

    John Finnan

  3. Department of Plant Ecology, IFZ, University of Gießen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26, 35392, Gießen, Germany

    Christoph Müller

Authors
  1. Burkart Dieterich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Finnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tamara Hochstrasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christoph Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burkart Dieterich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dieterich, B., Finnan, J., Hochstrasser, T. et al. The Greenhouse Gas Balance of a Dairy Farm as Influenced by the Uptake of Biogas Production. Bioenerg. Res. 7, 95–109 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9350-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9350-3

Keywords

search

Navigation