Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Meeting Sustainability Requirements for SRC Bioenergy: Usefulness of Existing Tools, Responsibilities of Involved Stakeholders, and Recommendations for Further Developments

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Short rotation coppice (SRC) is considered an important biomass supply option for meeting the European renewable energy targets. This paper presents an overview of existing and prospective sustainability requirements, Member State reporting obligations and parts of the methodology for calculating GHG emissions savings within the EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED), and shows how these RED-associated sustainability criteria may affect different stakeholders along SRC bioenergy supply chains. Existing and prospective tools are assessed on their usefulness in ensuring that SRC bioenergy is produced with sufficient consideration given to the RED-associated criteria. A sustainability framework is outlined that aims at (1) facilitating the development of SRC production systems that are attractive from the perspectives of all stakeholders, and (2) ensuring that the SRC production is RED eligible. Producer manuals, EIAs, and voluntary certification schemes can all be useful for ensuring RED eligibility. However, they are currently not sufficiently comprehensive, neither individually nor combined, and suggestions for how they can be more complementary are given. Geographical information systems offer opportunities for administrative authorities to provide stakeholders with maps or databases over areas/fields suitable for RED-eligible SRC cultivation. However, proper consideration of all relevant aspects requires that all stakeholders in the SRC supply chain become engaged in the development of SRC production systems and that a landscape perspective is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Forest management is regulated on a national level, with policy guidance through the EU Forestry Strategy and international processes such as the Ministerial Conference for the Protection of Forests in Europe.

  2. See also Englund et al. [17] for more information.

  3. Refers to RED criteria 2.2–6

  4. Refers to RED criteria 1.1–3, 2.1, 3.1–2

  5. Refers to RED criteria 4.1–2, 4.4

  6. Refers to RED criterion 3.3

  7. Refers to RED criterion 4.3

  8. Other EU countries use similar systems.

  9. The status of a particular area in 2008 (e.g., natural forest, wetland etc.) is assessed when the RED-eligibility of a bioenergy project is determined.

  10. In the Environmental, Social, and Health Impact Assessment for the Addax Bioenergy sugarcane to ethanol project in Bombali, Sierra Leone [29], GIS was used for assessing several impacts. To make the GIS analyses possible, they had to produce high-resolution datasets themselves, as such datasets did not exist for the study area.

References

  1. IEA (2008) Energy technology perspectives. International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/techno/etp/index.asp. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  2. IEA (2010) World energy outlook 2010 edition. International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/weo/2010.asp. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  3. IPCC (2011) Special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation (IPCC SRREN). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. http://srren.ipcc-wg3.de/report. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  4. Junginger M, van Dam J, Zarrilli S, Mohammed FA, Marchal D, Faaij A (2010) Opportunities and barriers for international bioenergy trade. Energy Policy 39(4):2028–2042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. O'Connell D, Braid A, Raison J, Handberg K, Cowie A, Rodriguez L, George B (2009) Sustainable production of bioenergy: a review of global bioenergy sustainability frameworks and assessment systems. Rural Industries Research and Development. https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/09-167. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  6. Stupak I, Lattimore B, Titus BD, Tattersall Smith C (2011) Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest fuel production and harvesting: a review of current standards for sustainable forest management. Biomass Bioenergy 35(8):3287–3308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Dam J, Junginger M, Faaij APC (2010) From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(9):2445–2472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. European Council (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:en:PDF . Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  9. European Commission (2010) Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on sustainability requirements for the use of solid and gaseous biomass sources in electricity, heating and cooling (SEC(2010) 65 final SEC(2010) 66 final). http://ec.europa.eu/energy/renewables/transparency_platform/doc/2010_report/com_2010_0011_3_report.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  10. Styles D, Jones M (2007) Energy crops in Ireland: quantifying the potential life-cycle greenhouse gas reductions of energy-crop electricity. Biomass Bioenergy 31(11–12):759–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dimitriou I, Baum C, Baum S, Busch G, Schulz U, Köhn J et al (2009) The impact of short rotation coppice (SRC) cultivation on the environment. Landbauforschung—vTI Agric For Res 3(59):159–162

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dimitriou et al. This Issue

  13. Baum C, Leinweber P, Weih M, Lamersdorf N, Dimitriou I (2009) Effects of short rotation coppice with willows and poplar on soil ecology. Landbauforschung 59(3):183–196

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baum et al. This Issue

  15. Schultz et al. This Issue

  16. Council of Europe (200-) The European Landscape Convention. Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/Landscape/default_en.asp. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  17. Englund O, Berndes G, Johnson H, Ostwald M (2011) Environmental Impact Assessments: Suitable for supporting assessments of biofuel sustainability? Technical report for the EU Biofuel 2008 Baseline study. Chalmers University of Technology. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/cpl/record/index.xsql?pubid=146738 . Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  18. Weih M (2006) Energiskogsodling på åkermark—möjligheter för biologisk mångfald och kulturmiljö i ett landskapsperspektiv. Report to the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation. Swedish University of Agriculture (SLU). http://pub.epsilon.slu.se/3075/1/SNV_Dnr802-114-04.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  19. IAIA (1999) Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. International Association for Impact Assessment. http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/Principles%20of%20IA_web.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  20. IAIA (2010) What is impact assessment? International Association for Impact Assessment. http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/What%20is%20IA_web.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  21. UNEP (2004) Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach. The United Nations Environment Programme. http://www.unep.ch/etu/publications/textONUBr.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  22. European Commission (2011) Memo: certification schemes for biofuels. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/11/522&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en . Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  23. EUR-Lex (2011) Case T-278/11: Action brought on 25 May 2011—ClientEarth and others/Commission. The Publications Office of the European Union. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:219:0020:02:EN:HTML. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  24. ClientEarth, Friends of the Earth Europe, Stitching FERN, Corporate Europe Observatory (2011) Application for annulment under article 263 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. ClientEarth. http://www.clientearth.org/reports/application-to-court-clientearth-et-al-v-commission-250511.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  25. FSC Finland (2010) FSC standard for Finland. Finnish FSC Association. http://finland.fsc.org/Dokumentit/FSC%20Standard%20for%20Finland%20V1-1%20APPROVED%20210111.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2011

  26. Börjesson P, Berndes G (2006) The prospects for willow plantations for wastewater treatment in Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy 30(5):428–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dimitriou I, Rosenqvist H (2011) Sewage sludge and wastewater fertilisation of Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for increased bioenergy production—biological and economic potential. Biomass Bioenergy 35(2):835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berndes G, Fredriksson F, Börjesson P (2004) Cadmium accumulation and Salix based phytoextraction on arable land in Sweden. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103(1):207–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Coastal and Environmental Services (2009) Sugar cane to ethanol project. Draft ESHIA, Sierra Leone

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was financed by the Swedish Energy Agency's project 31455–1 within the frame of ERA-Net Bioenergy, which is gratefully acknowledged. We would also like to thank Mr. Dino for the support and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oskar Englund.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 129 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Englund, O., Berndes, G., Fredrikson, F. et al. Meeting Sustainability Requirements for SRC Bioenergy: Usefulness of Existing Tools, Responsibilities of Involved Stakeholders, and Recommendations for Further Developments. Bioenerg. Res. 5, 606–620 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9217-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9217-z

Keywords