Skip to main content
Log in

Aerobic and Anaerobic Storage of Single-pass, Chopped Corn Stover

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corn stover has great potential as a biomass feedstock due its widespread availability. However, storage characteristics of moist corn stover harvested from single-pass harvesters have not been well quantified. In 2007, whole-plant corn stover at 19.1–40.3% (w.b.) moisture content was stored for 237 days in aerobic piles, one covered and one uncovered, as well an anaerobic silo bag. In 2008, two stover materials—whole plant and cob/husk from 31.7% to 58.1% (w.b.) moisture—were stored for 183 or 204 days in covered and uncovered anaerobic piles, ventilated bags, or anaerobic silo bags. Stover stored in uncovered piles was rehydrated by precipitation, which increased biological activity resulting in dry matter (DM) losses from 8.2% to 39.1% with an average of 21.5%. Stover in covered piles was successfully conserved when the average moisture was less than 25% (w.b.) with DM losses of 3.3%. Stover above 36% (w.b.) moisture and piled under a plastic cover had DM losses from 6.4% to 20.2% with an average of 11.9%. Localized heating occurred in the aerobic piles when moisture was above 45% (w.b.) which lead to temperatures where spontaneous combustion might be a concern (i.e., >70°C). Ambient air blown through a center tube in the ventilated storage bag dried stover near the tube to an average of 24.2% (w.b.), but the remainder of the bag averaged 46.8% (w.b.) at removal. Loss of DM ranged from 7.4% to 22.0% with an average of 11.8% with this storage method. Stover was most successfully conserved in the bags where anaerobic conditions were maintained. Under anaerobic conditions, DM losses ranged from 0.2% to 0.9%. When anaerobic conditions were not maintained in the silo bag, DM losses averaged 6.1% of DM. Anaerobic storage is the best solution for conserving the value of moist corn stover.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASABE (2008) Standard S358.2: moisture measurement—forages. ASABE, St. Joseph

    Google Scholar 

  2. ASABE (2008) Standard S424.1: method of determining and expressing particle size of chopped forage materials by screening. ASABE, St. Joseph

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ayers GE, Buchele WF (1971) Harvesting and storing corn plant forage. ASAE Paper No. 71-665. ASABE, St. Joseph, MI

  4. Dewar WA, McDonald P, Whittenbury R (1963) The hydrolysis of grass hemicelluloses during ensilage. J Sci Food Agric 14:411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garvin RV, Inman LR, Schuette AP (1995) Method for treatment of bagged organic materials. United States Patent No. 5,461,843

  6. Hoglund CR (1964) Comparative storage losses and feeding values of alfalfa and corn silage crops when harvested at different moisture levels and stored in gas-tight and conventional tower silos. An appraisal of research results. Mich. State Univ., Dept. Agr. Econ. Mimeograph 946

  7. Kadam KL, McMillan JD (2003) Availability of corn stover as a sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 88:17–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorenz AJ, Coors JG, de Leon N, Wolfrum EJ, Hames BR, Sluiter AD, Weimer PJ (2009) Characterization, genetic variation, and combining ability of maize traits relevant to the production of cellulosic ethanol. Crop Sci 49(1):85–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE (1991) The biochemistry of silage. Cambrian Printers Ltd, Aberystwyth

    Google Scholar 

  10. Melvin JF (1965) Variations in the carbohydrate content of lucerne and the effect on ensilage. Aust J Agric Res 16:951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller DA, Rotz CA (1995) Forages volume 1: an introduction to grassland agriculture. Chapter 13, harvesting and storage. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  12. Muck RE (1988) Factors influencing silage quality and their implications for management. J Dairy Sci 71:2992–3002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pitt RE (1990) Silage and hay production. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service Publication Service Number 5. Cornell University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pitt RE, Muck RE (1993) A diffusion model of aerobic deterioration at the exposed face of bunker silos. J Agric Eng Res 55(1):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rotz CA, Muck RE (1994) Changes in forage quality during harvest and storage. In: Forage quality, evaluation and utilization. Madison, Wis.: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, 828–68

  16. SAS Institute (2008) SAS proprietary software, version 9.2. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shinners KJ, Binversie BN (2007) Fractional yield and moisture of corn stover biomass produced in the northern US Corn Belt. Biomass Bioenergy 31(8):576–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shinners KJ, Binversie BN, Muck RE, Weimer PJ (2007) Comparison of wet and dry corn stover harvest and storage. Biomass Bioenergy 31(4):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shinners KJ, Adsit GS, Binversie BN, Digman MF, Muck RE, Weimer PJ (2007) Single-pass, split-stream of corn grain and stover. Trans ASABE 50(2):355–363

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shinners KJ, Hoffman DS, Boettcher GC, Munk JT, Muck RE, Weimer PJ (2009) Single-pass harvest of corn grain and stover: performance of three harvester configurations. Trans ASABE 52(1):51–60

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shinners KJ, Bennett RG, Hoffman DS (2009b) Single- and two-pass corn stover harvesting systems. ASABE Paper No. 095652. ASABE, St. Joseph, MI

  22. USDA (2009) USDA feed grain baseline, 2009–18. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Corn/2009baseline.htm. Accessed August, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  23. USDOE (2008) Theoretical ethanol yield calculator. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, Available at: http://www.eere.energy.gov/biomass/ethanol_yield_calculator.html. Accessed August, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whitlock LA, Wistuba T, Siefers MK, Pope RV, Brent BE, Bolsen KK (2000) Effect of level of surface-spoiled silage on the nutritive value of corn silage-based rations. Kansas Agric Exp Sta Rpt Prog 850:22–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was partially sponsored by the University of Wisconsin College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, John Deere Harvester Works, John Deere Moline Technology and Innovation Center, and the DOE (Grant No. NRCS 68-3A75-4-137). This research could not have been completed without the assistance of the staff of the Arlington Agricultural Research Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin J. Shinners.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shinners, K.J., Wepner, A.D., Muck, R.E. et al. Aerobic and Anaerobic Storage of Single-pass, Chopped Corn Stover. Bioenerg. Res. 4, 61–75 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-010-9101-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-010-9101-7

Keywords

Navigation