Free Will, Self-Governance and Neuroscience: An Overview
Given dramatic increases in recent decades in the pace of scientific discovery and understanding of the functional organization of the brain, it is increasingly clear that engagement with the neuroscientific literature and research is central to making progress on philosophical questions regarding the nature and scope of human freedom and responsibility. While patterns of brain activity cannot provide the whole story, developing a deeper and more precise understanding of how brain activity is related to human choice and conduct is crucial to the development of realistic, just, and intellectually rigorous models of human agency and moral responsibility. In this special issue, we acknowledge that “free will” and “moral responsibility” are not concepts with which neuroscience can directly engage, and instead focus on self-governance, and the capacities that contribute to self-governance, which are more tractable for scientific investigation and are prerequisites for the presence of moral responsibility.
KeywordsFree will Self-governance Moral responsibility Neuroscience Decision-making
We wish to express our gratitude to the National Endowment for the Humanities and the Henry R. Luce Foundation (through a Professorship to HB) for their generous support for this work. Special thanks to editor Neil Levy for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.
- 1.Scanlon, T. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 6.Levy, N. 2017. Am I a racist? Implicit bias and the ascription of racism. The Philosophical Quarterly 67 (268): 534–551.Google Scholar
- 7.Levy, N. 2005. The good, the bad and the blameworthy. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 1 (2): 2–16.Google Scholar
- 8.Roskies, A. 2016. Decision-making and self-governing systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9280-9.
- 10.Watson, G., ed. 1982. Free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 11.Honderich, T. 1988. A theory of determinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 13.Kane, R., ed. 2011. The Oxford handbook on free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 14.Kane, R. 1998. The significance of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 15.O'Connor, T. 2000. Persons and causes: The metaphysics of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 17.Strawson, G. 1986. Freedom and belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 18.Smilansky, S. 2000. Free will and illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 19.Roskies, A. 2004. Everyday neuromorality. Cerebrum 6 (4): 58–65.Google Scholar
- 26.Brownstein, M., and J. Saul, eds. 2016b. Implicit bias and philosophy: Moral responsibility, structural injustice, and ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 28.Huebner, B. 2016. Implicit bias, reinforcement learning, and scaffolded moral cognition. In Implicit Bias and Philosophy: Metaphysics and epistemology, ed. M. Brownstein and J. Saul, 47–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 30.Brownstein, M., and J. Saul, eds. 2016a. Implicit bias and philosophy: Metaphysics and epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 31.Sali, A., Anderson, B., and Courtney, S. 2016. Information processing biases in the brain: Implications for decision-making and self-governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9251-1.
- 32.Niker, F., Reiner, P., and Felsen, G. 2016. Updating our selves: Synthesizing philosophical and neurobiological perspectives on incorporating new information into our worldview. (this volume). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-015-9246-3
- 33.Kentaro Fujita, Jessica Carnevale, and Yaacov Trope. 2016. Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9250-2.
- 34.Helion, C. and Ochsner, K. 2016. The Role of Emotion Regulation in Moral Judgment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9261-z.