Neuroscience and Punishment: From Theory to Practice
In a 2004 paper, Greene and Cohen predicted that neuroscience would revolutionise criminal justice by presenting a mechanistic view of human agency that would change people’s intuitions about retributive punishment. According to their theory, this change in intuitions would in turn lead to the demise of retributivism within criminal justice systems. Their influential paper has been challenged, most notably by Morse, who has argued that it is unlikely that there will be major changes to criminal justice systems in response to neuroscience. In this paper we commence a tentative empirical enquiry into the claims of these theorists, focusing on Australian criminal justice. Our analysis of Australian cases is not supportive of claims about the demise of retributive justice, and instead suggests the possibility that neuroscience may be used by the courts to calibrate retributive desert. It is thus more consistent with the predictive claims of Morse than of Greene and Cohen. We also consider evidence derived from interviews with judges, and this leads us to consider the possibility of a backlash against evidence of brain impairment. Finally we note that change in penal aims may be occurring that is unrelated to developments in neuroscience.
KeywordsNeuroscience Neurolaw Retribution Punishment Sentencing
- 2.Morse, S. 2010. Lost in the translation? An essay on law and neuroscience. In Law and Neuroscience, Current Legal Issues, ed. Michael Freeman, 530–562. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 3.McCay, A., and J. Kennett. 2016. My Brain made me do it: will neuroscience change the way we punish criminals? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/my-brain-made-me-do-it-will-neuroscience-change-the-way-we-punish-criminals-57571 Accessed 2 Jan 2018.
- 5.Hampton, J. 1984. The moral education theory of punishment. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (3): 208–238.Google Scholar
- 6.Honderich, T. 2006. Punishment: The supposed justifications revisited. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- 7.Duff, A. 2001. Punishment, communication and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 8.Von Hirsch, A. 1993. Censure and sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Feinberg, J. 1994. The expressive function of punishment. In A reader on punishment, ed. A. Duff and D. Garland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 10.R v Hoerler. 2004. Sentencing remarks, New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, NSWCCA 184.Google Scholar
- 11.R v Israil. 2002. Sentencing remarks, New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, NSWCCA 255.Google Scholar
- 13.Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory. 2017. Report of the Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory (1). https://childdetentionnt.royalcommission.gov.au/Documents/Royal-Commission-NT-Final-Report-Volume-1.pdf. Accessed 19 Dec 2018.
- 14.Noyes, Jenny. 2018. Sister fights to stop brother inheriting parents’ money after he killed them. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/sister-fights-to-stop-brother-inheriting-parents-money-after-he-killed-them-20181023-p50bhn.html Accessed 30 Oct 2018.
- 15.The Queen v Furlan. 2014. Sentencing remarks, Supreme Court of Victoria, VSC 36.Google Scholar
- 16.R v Terence Martin. 2011. Sentencing Remarks, Supreme Court of Tasmania. (29 September, Unreported).Google Scholar
- 17.Kennedy v R. 2018. Sentencing remarks, New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, NSWCCA 43. Google Scholar
- 20.Rossmanith, K. 2018. Small Wrongs: How we really say sorry in love, life and law, Melbourne: Hardie Grant Books.Google Scholar
- 22.Victorian Sentencing Council. 2015. Major drug offences: current sentencing practices. https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication-documents/Major%20Drug%20Offences%20Current%20Sentencing%20Practices.pdf Accessed 4 June 2018.
- 23.Judicial College of Victoria. 2017. Victorian sentencing manual http://www.judicialcollege.vic.edu.au/eManuals/VSM/index.htm#6189.htm Accessed 30 Oct 2018.
- 24.Kennett, J., N.A. Vincent, and A. Snoek. 2014. Drug addiction and criminal responsibility. In Handbook of Neuroethics, ed. Jens Clausen and Neil Levy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- 25.McCay, A. 2013. Behavioural genetics, moral agency and retributive sentencing: the case for mitigation. University of Sydney Library: PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
- 27.Ryan, Meghan. 2015. Science and the new rehabilitation. Virginia Journal of Criminal Law 3: 261–341.Google Scholar
- 28.Sentencing Advisory Council (Victoria). 2007. High-risk offenders: Post-sentence supervision and detention. https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication-documents/High%20Risk%20Offenders%20Post%20Sentence%20Supervision%20and%20Detention%20Final%20Report.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2018.