Delusions, Harmful Dysfunctions, and Treatable Conditions

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that delusions be conceived of as symptoms on the harmful dysfunction account of disorder: delusions sometimes arise from dysfunction, but can also arise through normal cognition. Much attention has thus been payed to the question of how we can determine whether a delusion arises from dysfunction as opposed to normal cognition. In this paper, we consider another question, one that remains under-explored: which delusions warrant treatment? On the harmful dysfunction account, this question dissociates from the question about dysfunction—there are a broad range of “treatable conditions” beyond mere harmful dysfunctions. As such, many conditions that arise from normal cognition are also eligible for medical intervention. We argue that some delusions that arise from normal cognition may well fall under the banner of treatable conditions. We examine the practical and ethical questions surrounding such treatment, including the issue of coercive and deceptive treatment options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    At various points, Sakakibara seems to be talking only about the question of when coercive treatment is warranted, but at other points he includes any kind of “medical intervention,” and on one occasion (p. 155) appears to run together the question of pathology and treatment when discussing the potential dysfunctionality of delusional jealousy. In The Uncertainty Surrounding Dysfunction in Delusions we show why it is particularly problematic to link treatment to dysfunction in the case of delusions, and in Treatment Types: A Role for Dysfunction after all? we discuss how this relates to coercive treatment. Whatever Sakakibara’s original intent, the idea raises interesting questions that are worth exploring.

  2. 2.

    A previous attempt can be found in the work of Miyazono [2]. We think that Sakakibara’s work is an improvement on this attempt, mostly for the explanatory power cited in Explanatory Power. Miyazono tends to downplay the idea that delusions are symptoms, and that symptoms can often arise in the context of normal functioning, which we think is a key observation about delusions.

  3. 3.

    We should point out that we think this is an unnecessary dichotomy: “physical” symptoms can arise in the course of normal functioning, though it is true that this problem is more common and more difficult to resolve for mental symptoms.

  4. 4.

    For discussions of delusions and the relation to pathology, see [2, 8, 12].

  5. 5.

    For our purposes, we take it that delusions are beliefs, which is the general clinical and scientific conception. For an overview of some philosophical debates, and an argument in favour of the doxastic conception of delusions, see [20].

  6. 6.

    Similar sentiments have been expressed by others:

    Understanding psychopathology based on an analysis of harmful dysfunction will therefore not be relevant from a practical clinical perspective without an evolutionary psychology of normal functional psychological mechanisms as well as psychopathology—that is, a science of function is necessary to define dysfunction. Whether or not something has an evolved function is currently not a question that may be easily resolved—the mapping of our adaptations has only just begun. [34, p. 453]

    evidence does not yield a clear demarcation between normality and disorder for mood phenomena, and the evolutionary literature does not much aid in delineating the boundary either. We may have to accept that much of what we currently identify as clinical depression cannot be shown to be dysfunction, and moreover that the clear presence of dysfunction cannot be used as the criterion for applying or withholding medical attention. [35, p. 212]

    it might be true one day—though it isn’t true at present—that our theories about how normal cognitive processes operate have become so detailed that they make predictions about whether particular treatment techniques will or won’t be effective. If that day comes, then treatment studies will be relevant to theories about normal cognitive, and cognitive neuropsychology will be directly concerned with issues involving treatment. [14, p. 4]

  7. 7.

    Sakakibara [3, p. 154] does not refer to this delusion by name, but the description matches delusional cases of reverse-Othello.

  8. 8.

    This complex relation between dysfunction and treatment is the reason we earlier (The Uncertainty Surrounding Dysfunction in Delusions) raised issue with Sakakibara’s inference from successful “treatment” to the existence of underlying dysfunction: treating a symptom does not indicate an underlying dysfunction, since it is possible to treat normal as well as dysfunctional symptoms, sometimes through the exact same method. The inference from successful “treatment” to underlying dysfunction is considered a complete misstep on the harmful dysfunction account [66, pp. 839-840]. On this note, we should say that we think the “bizarreness” and “un-understandability” clues mentioned by Sakakibara are likely the most useful: symptoms being out of context or inexplicable when placed within an appropriate examination of the patient’s life and social environment are the kinds of clues that the HD account sees as generally most useful—though still fallible—in the attempt to discern dysfunctionality [68].

References

  1. 1.

    Wakefield, J.C. 1992. Disorder as harmful dysfunction: a conceptual critique of dsm-iii-r’s definition of mental disorder. Psychological Review 99 (2): 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Miyazono, K. 2015. Delusions as harmful malfunctioning beliefs. Consciousness and cognition 33: 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sakakibara, E. 2016. Irrationality and pathology of beliefs. Neuroethics 9 (2): 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cosmides, L., and J. Tooby. 1999. Toward an evolutionary taxonomy of treatable conditions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108 (3): 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Del Giudice, M. 2016. The evolutionary future of psychopathology. Current Opinion in Psychology 7: 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Varga, S. 2017. Mental disorder between naturalism and normativism. Philosophy Compass 12 (6): 1–9.

  7. 7.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2007. The concept of mental disorder: diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry 6 (3): 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bortolotti, L. 2010. Delusions and other irrational beliefs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Association, A.P, et al. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5 R): American Psychiatric Publishers.

  10. 10.

    Coltheart, M. 2017. Confabulation and conversation. Cortex 87: 62–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nisbett, R.E., and T.D. Wilson. 1977. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological review 84 (3): 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Petrolini, V. 2017. What makes delusions pathological? Philosophical Psychology 30 (4): 502–523.

  13. 13.

    Davies, M., M. Coltheart, R. Langdon, and N. Breen. 2001. Monothematic delusions: Towards a two-factor account. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 8 (2): 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Coltheart, M. 2001. Assumptions and methods in cognitive neuropsychology. In The handbook of cognitive neuropsychology: What deficits reveal about the human mind, ed. Brenda Raap, 3–21. New York: Psychology Press.

  15. 15.

    Chang, H. 2017. Epistemic iteration and natural kinds: Realism and pluralism in taxonomy. In Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry IV: Classification of Psychiatric Illness, eds. Kenneth S. Kendler and Joseph Parnas, 229-245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  16. 16.

    McKay, R., and L. Cipolotti. 2007. Attributional style in a case of cotard delusion. Consciousness and cognition 16 (2): 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Breen, N., D. Caine, M. Coltheart, et al. 2001. Mirrored-self misidentification: Two cases of focal onset dementia. Neurocase 7 (3): 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tabb, K., Schaffner, K.F. 2017. Causal pathways, random walks, and tortuous paths: Moving from the descriptive to the etiological in psychiatry. In Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry IV: Classification of Psychiatric Illness, eds. Kenneth S. Kendler and Joseph Parnas, 342-360. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  19. 19.

    Wakefield, J.C. 1999. Evolutionary Versus Prototype Analyses of the Concept of Disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 108 (3): 374–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Clutton, P. Forthcoming. A New Defence of Doxasticism about Delusions: The Cognitive Phenomenological Defence, Mind & Language.

  21. 21.

    Coltheart, M., R. Langdon, and R. McKay. 2011. Delusional belief. Annual review of psychology 62: 271–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sullivan-Bissett, E. 2017. Biological function and epistemic normativity. Philosophical Explorations 20 (1): 94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bayne, T. 2017. Delusions and the norms of rationality. In Rationality: Constraints and Contexts, eds. T-W Hung & T. Lane, 77-94. London: Elsevier.

  24. 24.

    Fodor, J.A. 2001. The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge: The MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Connors, M.H., Halligan, P.W. 2014. A cognitive account of belief: a tentative road map. Frontiers in psychology 5: 1-14.

  26. 26.

    Nairne, J.S., and J.N. Pandeirada. 2008. Adaptive memory remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science 17 (4): 239–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schacter, D.L. 2012. Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory. American Psychologist 67 (8): 603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Conway, M.A. 2005. Memory and the self. Journal of memory and language 53 (4): 594–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Klein, S.B., L. Cosmides, J. Tooby, and S. Chance. 2002. Decisions and the evolution of memory: multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological review 109 (2): 306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Suddendorf, T., and M.C. Corballis. 2007. The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (03): 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ally, B.A., E.P. Hussey, and M.J. Donahue. 2013. A case of hyperthymesia: rethinking the role of the amygdala in autobiographical memory. Neurocase 19 (2): 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Parker, E.S., L. Cahill, and J.L. McGaugh. 2006. A case of unusual autobiographical remembering. Neurocase 12 (1): 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Diamond, D.M., and P.R. Zoladz. 2016. Dysfunctional or hyperfunctional? the amygdala in posttraumatic stress disorder is the bull in the evolutionary china shop. Journal of Neuroscience Research 94 (6): 437–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kennair, L.E.O. 2010. The problem of defining psychopathology and challenges to evolutionary psychology theory. In The evolution of personality and individual differences, eds. David M. Buss and Patricia H. Hawley, 451-480. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  35. 35.

    Nettle, D. 2011. Normality, disorder and evolved function: The case of depression. In Maladapting Minds: Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Evolutionary Theory, eds. Pieter R. Adriaens and Andreas de Block, 198–215. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  36. 36.

    Wakefield, J.C., K.J. Pottick, and S.A. Kirk. 2002. Should the dsm-iv diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder consider social context? The American journal of psychiatry 159 (3): 380–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2005. On winking at the facts, and losing one’s hare: value pluralism and the harmful dysfunction analysis. World psychiatry 4 (2): 88–89.

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2005. Sexual dysfunction or pain disorder?: Dyspareunia from the perspective of the harmful dysfunction analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior 34 (1): 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nesse, R.M., Jackson, E.D. 2011. Evolutionary foundations for psychiatric diagnosis: making dsm-v valid. In (eds.) Pieter R. Adriaens and Andreas de Block, Maladapting Minds: Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Evolutionary Theory: 173–197.

  40. 40.

    Bolton, D. 2000. Alternatives to disorder. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 7 (2): 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nesse, R.M. 2001. The smoke detector principle. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 935 (1): 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Giudice, M.D., Ellis, B.J. 2016. Evolutionary foundations of developmental psychopathology. In Developmental psychopathology Volume Two: Developmental Neuroscience, ed. Dante Cicchetti, 1-58. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  43. 43.

    Wakefield, J. 2017. Taking people as they are: Evolutionary psychopathology, uncomplicated depression, and distinction between normal and disordered sadness. In The Evolution of Psychopathology, eds. Todd K. Shackelford and Virgil Zeigler-Hill, 37–72. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 

  44. 44.

    Bolton, D. 2008. What is mental disorder? An essay in philosophy, science, and values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cooper, R. 2005. Classifying madness: A philosophical examination of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Murphy, D. 2006. Psychiatry in the scientific image. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tsai, S.J., J.P. Hwang, C.H. Yang, and K.M. Liu. 1997. Delusional jealousy in dementia. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 58 (11): 492–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Langdon, R. 2013. Folie à deux and its lessons for two-factor theorists. Mind & Language 28 (1): 72–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Arnone, D., A. Patel, and G.M.Y. Tan. 2006. The nosological significance of folie à deux: a review of the literature. Annals of General Psychiatry 5 (1): 11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Silva, A., M. Ferrari, G. Leong, and G. Penny. 1998. The dangerousness of persons with delusional jealousy. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 26 (4): 607–623.

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Daulatabad, D., Sonthalia, S., Srivastava, A., Bhattacharya, S.N., Kaul, S., Moyal, D. 2016. Folie a deux and delusional disorder by proxy: an atypical presentation. Australasian Journal of Dermatology 58 (3): e113-e116.

  52. 52.

    Nielssen, O., R. Langdon, and M. Large. 2013. Folie à deux homicide and the two-factor model of delusions. Cognitive neuropsychiatry 18 (5): 390–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Reznek, L. 2010. Delusions and the Madness of the Masses. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

  54. 54.

    McKay, R.T., and D.C. Dennett. 2009. The evolution of misbelief. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (06): 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Bortolotti, L., Sullivan-Bissett, E. 2017. How can false or irrational beliefs be useful? Philosophical Explorations 20 (S1): S1-S3.

  56. 56.

    Bortolotti, L. 2016. Epistemic benefits of elaborated and systematized delusions in schizophrenia. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3): 879–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Bortolotti, L. 2015. The epistemic innocence of motivated delusions. Consciousness and cognition 33: 490–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Meltzer, H.Y. 2012. Clozapine: balancing safety with superior antipsychotic efficacy. Clinical schizophrenia & related psychoses 6 (3): 134–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lieberman, J.A., T.S. Stroup, J.P. McEvoy, M.S. Swartz, R.A. Rosenheck, D.O. Perkins, R.S. Keefe, S.M. Davis, C.E. Davis, B.D. Lebowitz, J. Severe, and J.K. Hsiao. 2005. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. New England Journal of Medicine 353 (12): 1209–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Moritz, S., R. Veckenstedt, S. Randjbar, F. Vitzthum, and T. Woodward. 2011. Antipsychotic treatment beyond antipsychotics: metacognitive intervention for schizophrenia patients improves delusional symptoms. Psychological medicine 41 (09): 1823–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Horwitz, A.V., and J.C. Wakefield. 2012. All we have to fear: Psychiatry's transformation of natural anxieties into mental disorders. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Horwitz, A.V., and J.C. Wakefield. 2007. The loss of sadness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zachar, P. 2014. Beyond natural kinds: Toward a relevant scientific taxonomy in psychiatry. Kincaid and Sullivan (eds.)(2014): 75–104.

  64. 64.

    Freeman, D., G. Dunn, H. Startup, K. Pugh, J. Cordwell, H. Mander, E. Cernis, G. Wing-ham, K. Shirvell, and D. Kingdon. 2015. Effects of cognitive behaviour therapy for worry on persecutory delusions in patients with psychosis (wit): a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial with a mediation analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry 2 (4): 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2017. Addiction and the Concept of Disorder, Part 2: Is every Mental Disorder a Brain Disorder?. Neuroethics 10 (1): 55-67.

  66. 66.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2013. The DSM-5 debate over the bereavement exclusion: Psychiatric diagnosis and the future of empirically supported treatment. Clinical Psychology Review 33 (7): 825–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2013. Addiction, the concept of disorder, and pathways to harm: comment on Levy. Frontiers in psychiatry 4: 1-2.

  68. 68.

    Wakefield, J.C., and M.B. First. 2012. Placing symptoms in context: the role of contextual criteria in reducing false positives in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders diagnoses. Comprehensive psychiatry 53 (2): 130–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2005. Disorders versus problems of living in DSM: Rethinking social work’s relationship to psychiatry. In (ed.) Stuart Kirk, Mental disorders in the social environment: Critical perspectives: 83-95.

  70. 70.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2010. False positives in psychiatric diagnosis: implications for human freedom. Theoretical medicine and bioethics 31 (1): 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2008. The perils of dimensionalization: Challenges in distinguishing negative traits from personality disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 31 (3): 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Benn, P. 2001. Medicine, lies and deceptions. Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2): 130–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Jackson, J. 2002. Truth, trust and medicine. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Hughes, J.C., Baldwin, C. 2006. Ethical issues in dementia care: making difficult decisions. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

  75. 75.

    Matthes, J., and H. Caples. 2013. Ethical issues in using deception to facilitate rehabilitation for a patient with severe traumatic brain injury. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation 28 (2): 126–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Lewis, M. 2017. Addiction and the brain: development, not disease. Neuroethics 10 (1): 7–18.

  77. 77.

    Wakefield, J.C. 2017. Can the harmful dysfunction analysis explain why addiction is a medical disorder?: Reply to marc lewis. Neuroethics 10 (2): 313–317.

  78. 78.

    Wild, T.C., A.B. Roberts, and E.L. Cooper. 2002. Compulsory substance abuse treatment: An overview of recent findings and issues. European Addiction Research 8 (2): 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Caplan, A. 2008. Denying autonomy in order to create it: the paradox of forcing treatment upon addicts. Addiction 103 (12): 1919–1921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Ryan, C.J., G. de Moore, and M. Patfield. 1995. Becoming none but tradesmen: lies, deception and psychotic patients. Journal of medical ethics 21 (2): 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Teo, D.C., A.M. Abraham, and A.L. Peh. 2017. Folie à deux and Fregoli syndrome with greater severity in the ‘secondary’–A case report. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 25: 254–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Series, L. 2015. Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: Mental capacity and support paradigms. International journal of law and psychiatry 40: 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Clutton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clutton, P., Gadsby, S. Delusions, Harmful Dysfunctions, and Treatable Conditions. Neuroethics 11, 167–181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-017-9347-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Delusion
  • Treatment
  • Symptom
  • Dysfunction
  • Disorder