Personal Autonomy and Authenticity: Adolescents’ Discretionary Use of Methylphenidate
Minors with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) are liable to use pharmacological treatment against their will and may find their authentic “I” modified. Thus, their use is widely criticized. In this study, the effect of ADHD drugs on adolescents’ personal experience is examined. The goal is to understand how psychological changes that young people experience when they take these medications interrelate with their attitude toward being medicated. Methylphenidate is the most common pharmacological treatment for ADHD. We look into the change that Israeli adolescents undergo when they use it; their experience in controlling the change, and their assessment of the meaning of the change for their lives. Thirty-eight adolescents participated in semi-structured interviews. The findings, analyzed using grounded theory, show that methylphenidate affects the participants’ demeanor, mood, and even preferences. The participants, aware of these effects, apply discretion in taking methylphenidate and thus influence their traits and their willingness to engage in various activities. When needing to prepare for a matriculation exam, for example, they take methylphenidate; when they need to be creative or sociable, they avoid it and enjoy what they consider the advantages of ADHD, such as creativity and spontaneity. As discretionary users, they shape their life stories in a way that makes them more meaningful and diverse, better tailored to their social surroundings, and more useful in maintaining personal autonomy in the course of pharmacological treatment of ADHD.
Keywordsmethylphenidate (Ritalin) ADHD discretion personal autonomy authenticity psychopharmacology
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest in relation to the submitted manuscript.
- 2.Wolraich, M.L., and G.J. DuPaul. 2010. ADHD diagnosis and management: A practical guide for the clinic and the classroom. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
- 10.Bussing, R., M. Koro-Ljungberg, K. Noguchi, D. Mason, G. Mayerson, and C.W. Garvan. 2012. Willingness to use ADHD treatments: A mixed-methods study of perceptions by adolescents, parents, health professionals and teachers. Social Science & Medicine 74: 92–100. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.10.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Prasad, V., E. Brogan, C. Mulvaney, M. Grainge, W. Stanton, and K. Sayal. 2013. How effective are drug treatments for children with ADHD at improving on-task behaviour and academic achievement in the school classroom? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 22 (4): 203–216. doi: 10.1007/s00787-012-0346-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Cortese, S., M. Holtmann, T. Banaschewski, J. Buitelaar, D. Coghill, M. Danckaerts, R.W. Dittmann, J. Graham, E. Yayler, and J. Sergeant. 2013. Practitioner review: Current best practice in the management of adverse events during treatment with ADHD medications in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry 54: 227–246. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Varga, S., and C. Guignon. 2016. “Authenticity,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/authenticity/.
- 22.Fukuyama, F. 2003. Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
- 24.Guignon, C. 2004. On being authentic. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 25.Varga, S. 2011. Authenticity as an Ethical Ideal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 30.Thaler, D.S. 2009. Improving introspection to inform free will regarding the choice by healthy individuals to use or not use cognitive enhancing drugs. Harm Reduction Journal 6 (10). doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-6-10.
- 32.Foucault, M. 2006. Psychiatric power: lectures at the College de France 1973–1974, ed. J. Lagrange, tr. G. Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- 33.Patton, M.Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 35.Patton, M.Q. 1999. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research 34 (5 Pt 2): 1189–1208 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1089059/.Google Scholar