Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emerging Ethical Issues Related to the Use of Brain-Computer Interfaces for Patients with Total Locked-in Syndrome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Neuroethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New brain-computer interface and neuroimaging techniques are making differentiation less ambiguous and more accurate between unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients and patients with higher cognitive function and awareness. As research into these areas continues to progress, new ethical issues will face physicians of patients suffering from total locked-in syndrome (total LIS), characterized by complete loss of voluntary muscle control, with retention of cognitive function and awareness detectable only with neuroimaging and brain-computer interfaces. Physicians, researchers, ethicists and hospital ethics committees should be aware of and prepared to handle ethical issues unique to these totally locked-in patients. Several thought experiments are discussed, to highlight potential ethical dilemmas surrounding surrogate decision-making, autonomy, end-of-life care, and pediatric care, which will be unique to total LIS patients. These, along with other ethical problems especially relevant to total LIS patients, merit further discussion among physicians, researchers, ethicists and hospital ethics committees, to facilitate consensus regarding these issues, and improve patient care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolpaw, Jonathan R., and Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw. 2012. Brain-computer interfaces: something new under the sun. In Brain-computer interfaces: principles and practice, ed. Jonathan R. Wolpaw and Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw, 3–11. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruno, Marie-Aurélie, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Aurore Thibaut, Gustave Moonen, and Steven Laureys. 2011. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness. Journal of Neurology. 258(7): 1373–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haynes, John-Dylan, and Geraint Rees. 2006. Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 7: 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. John, E. Roy, James P. Halper, R. Sandlin Lowe III, Henry Merkin, Philip Defina, and Leslie S. Prichep. 2011. Source imaging of QEEG as a method to detect awareness in a person in vegetative state. Brain Injury. 25(4): 426–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laureys, Steven, Fabien Perrin, Caroline Schnakers, Melanie Boly, and Steve Majerus. 2005. Residual cognitive function in comatose, vegetative and minimally conscious states. Current Opinion in Neurology. 18: 726–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Monti, Martin M., Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Martin Coleman, et al. 2010. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New England Journal of Medicine. 362(7): 579–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakase-Richardson, R., S. Yablon, M. Sherer, C. Evans, and T. Nick. 2008. Serial yes/no reliability after traumatic brain injury: implications regarding the operational criteria for emergence from the minimally conscious state. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 79: 216–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Staffen, W., M. Kronbichler, M. Aichhorn, A. Mair, and G. Ladurner. 2006. Selective brain activity in response to one’s own name in the persistent vegetative state. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 77(12): 1383–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer, G., F. Gerstenbrand, and E. Rumpl. 1979. Varieties of the locked-in syndrome. Journal of Neurology. 221(2): 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kübler, A., and N. Birbaumer. 2008. Brain-computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralyzed patients? Clinical Neurophysiology. 119(11): 2658–2666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Birbaumer, Niels, Ander Ramos Murguialday, and Leonardo Cohen. 2008. Brain-computer interface in paralysis. Current Opinion in Neurology. 21(6): 634–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fenton, Andrew, and Sheri Alpert. 2008. Extending our view on using BCIs for locked-in syndrome. Neuroethics 1: 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hayashi, Hideaki, and Edward Anthony Oppenheimer. 2003. ALS patients on TPPV: totally locked-in state, neurologic findings and ethical implications. Neurology 61(1): 135–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Naito, Masayoshi, Yohko Michioka, Kuniaki Ozawa, Yoshitoshi Ito, Masashi Kiguchi, and Tsuneo Kanazawa. 2007. A communication means for totally locked-in ALS patients based on changes in cerebral blood volume measured with near-infrared light. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems. E90-D(7): 1028–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Birbaumer, N., N. Ghanayim, T. Hinterberger, I. Iversen, B. Kotchoubey, A. Kübler, J. Perelmouter, E. Taub, and H. Flor. 1999. A spelling device for the paralysed. Nature 398(6725): 297–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hochberg, Leigh R., and Kim D. Anderson. 2012. BCI users and their needs. In Brain-computer interfaces: principles and practice, ed. Jonathan R. Wolpaw and Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw, 317–322. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Fins, Joseph J., and Nicholas D. Schiff. 2010. In the blink of the Mind’s eye. Hastings Center Report. 40(3): 21–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Allain, Philippe, Pierre Alain Joseph, Jean Luc Isambert, Didier Le Gall, and Jean Emile. 1998. Cognitive functions in chronic locked-in syndrome: a report of two cases. Cortex 34(4): 629–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruno, Marie-Auriéle, Jan L. Bernheim, Didier Ledoux, Frédéric Pellas, Athena Demertzi, and Steven Laureys. 2011. A survey on self-assessed well-being in a cohort of chronic locked-in syndrome patients: happy majority, miserable minority. BMJ Open 1: e000039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laureys, Steven, Frédéric Pellas, Philippe Van Eeckhout, et al. 2005. The locked-in syndrome: what is it like to be conscious but paralyzed and voiceless? Progress in Brain Research. 150: 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lulé, D., C. Zickler, S. Häcker, et al. 2009. Life can be worth living in locked-in syndrome. Progress in Brain Research. 177: 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sellers, Eric W., Theresa M. Vaughan, and Jonathan R. Wolpaw. 2010. A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 11(5): 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nijboer, Femke, Jens Clausen, Brendan Z. Allison, and Pim Haselager. 2013. The Asilomar survey: stakeholders’ opinions on ethical issues related to brain-computer interfacing. Neuroethics 6: 541–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kopsky, David Jos, Yvonne Winninghoff, Albert C.M. Winninghoff, and Janneke Marjan Stolwijk-Swüste. 2014. A novel spelling system for locked-in syndrome patients using only eye contact. Disability and Rehabilitation. 36(20): 1723–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. American Medical Association. 2012. Code of medical ethics of the American Medical Association current opinions with annotations. .http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics.page. Accessed 16 Mar 2016

  26. Supreme Court of the United States. 1944. Prince v. Massachusetts. 321 U.S. 158.

  27. Sheldon, Mark. 1996. Ethical issues in the forced transfusion of Jehovah’s witness children. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 14(2): 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schneider, Mary-Jane, Joseph J. Fins, and Jonathan R. Wolpaw. 2012. Ethical issues in BCI research. In Brain-computer interfaces: principles and practice, ed. Jonathan R. Wolpaw and Elizabeth Winter Wolpaw, 373–382. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hammer, Eva Marie, Sonja Häcker, Martin Hautzinger, Thomas D. Meyer, and Andrea Kübler. 2008. Validity of the ALS-depression-inventory (ADI-12) – a new screening instrument for depressive disorders in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Affective Disorders. 109(1–2): 213–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hart, Robert P., James L. Levenson, Curtis N. Sessler, Al M. Best, Steven M. Schwartz, and Laura E. Rutherford. 1996. Validation of a cognitive test for delirium in medical ICU patients. Psychosomatics 37(6): 533–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. American Academy of Neurology (AAN). 1993. Position of the American Academy of Neurology on certain aspects of the care and management of profoundly and irreversibly paralyzed patients with retained consciousness and cognition. Neurology 43: 222–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maytal, Guy, and Theodore A. Stern. 2006. The desire for death in the setting of terminal illness: a case discussion. The Primary Care Companion to the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 8(5): 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Binks, Jessie A., Wendy S. Barden, Tricia A. Burke, and Nancy L. Young. 2007. What do We really know about the transition to adult-centered health care? A focus on cerebral palsy and Spina bifida. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 88(8): 1064–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kawachi, Ichiro, and Lisa F. Berkman. 2001. Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health. 78(3): 458–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biology Department, Brigham Young University, 4145 LSB, Provo, UT, 84602, USA

    Michael N. Abbott & Steven L. Peck

Authors
  1. Michael N. Abbott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven L. Peck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven L. Peck.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by corresponding author’s internal departmental funds.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abbott, M.N., Peck, S.L. Emerging Ethical Issues Related to the Use of Brain-Computer Interfaces for Patients with Total Locked-in Syndrome. Neuroethics 10, 235–242 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9296-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9296-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation