, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 253–261 | Cite as

Ethical Theories Used by Neurosurgery Residents to Make Decisions in Challenging Cases of Medical Ethics

  • Sahar Sobhani
  • Anoosheh Ghasemian
  • Farshad Farzadfar
  • Hosein Mashhadinejad
  • Bahram Hejrani
Original Paper


Neurosurgeons have an especially high rate of exposure to serious ethical challenges in their line of work. The aim of this study was to assess the type and frequency of ethical theories used by neurosurgery residents to make extra- ethical decisions in challenging situations and their relation with the level of residency, and curricular training about medical ethics. A total of 12 neurosurgery residents in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (MUMS) were interviewed; all the participants were male and aged 29–40 years old. Of all, six were senior and six were junior. Using a systematic review of neurosurgery and medical ethics textbooks, five common cases were selected and a semi-structured, open-ended interview was developed. The interviews were digitally recorded and analyzed in two separate stages. Comparison of the results of the two stages led us to the final judgment about the dominant ethical theory used in each case. In all 60 cases, the decision-making process was compatible with either Deontology (30 cases) or Consequentialism (30 cases). Only in two cases, beside Deontology, the Virtue ethics was used as an alternative in special situations. The ethical theories were not consistent for all the 12 subjects and all the five questions. No statistically significant difference was found between senior and junior residents, neither for each question nor for the aggregate (Odds Ratio = 1.31, 95 % CI = 0.42-4.09, Relative Risk = 1.41, 95 % CI = 0.69-1.9, P-value > 0.20). Only one of the subjects had extracurricular training in medical ethics, consequently precluding further analysis. Although not intended to be evaluated by this study, similar heterogeneity was observed in final decisions. When faced with medical ethics challenges, neurosurgery residents did not follow a consistent ethical theory for making decisions. The type and frequency of theories did not seem to be changed during the residency period.


Medical ethics Neurosurgery Interview survey Decision making 


  1. 1.
    Nandu, H. 2006. Training for ethical decision-making in neurosurgery. TuftScope 5: 21–24.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ammar, A., and M. Bernstein. 2014. Neurosurgical ethics in practice: Value-based medicine. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Winn, H.R. 2004. Youmans neurological surgery, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferrell, O.C., and L.G. Gresham. 1985. Contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing 49: 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunt, S.D., and S. Vitell. 1986. A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6: 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferrell, O.C., L.G. Gresham, and J. Fraedrich. 1989. A synthesis of ethical decision making models for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing 9: 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gensler, H.J. 1998. Ethics: A contemporary introduction, 1hth ed. Cleveland: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowie, R.A. 2001. Ethical studies, 1hth ed. Cheltenham: Nelson thornes.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwartz, L., E.P. Precee, and R.A. Hendry. 2002. Medical ethics: A case based approach, 1st ed. London: Saunders.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Loewy, E.H. 1989. Textbook of medical ethics, 1st ed. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Depender, W., and W.I. Chandler. 1990. Clinical ethics: An invitation to healing professionals, 1st ed. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lo, B. 2000. Resolving ethical dilemmas: A guide for clinicians, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mappes, T.A., and D. DeGrazia. 2001. Biomedical ethics, 5th ed. Boston: Mc Graw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loewy, E.H., and R.S. Loewy. 2005. Textbook of healthcare ethics, 2nd ed. USA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaplan, H.I., and B.J. Sadock. 2005. Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rimon-Zarfaty, N., and A. Jotkowitz. 2012. The Israeli abortion committees’ process of decision making: An ethical analysis. Journal of Medical Ethics 38: 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grundstein-Amado, R. 1993. Ethical decision-making processes used by health care providers. Journal of Advanced Nursing 18: 1701–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sommer, C., M. Boos, E. Conradi, N. Biller-Andorno, and C. Wiesemann. 2011. Care and justice arguments in the ethical reasoning of medical students. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 2: 9–32.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kant, I. 1998. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bentham, J. 1996. An introduction to the principles and morals of legislation. Clarendon: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weinstein, D. 2007. Utilitarianism and the new liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aristotle, G.J. 1999. Nichomachean ethics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fletcher, J.F. 1997. Situation ethics: The new morality. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bartels, D.M., C.W. Bauman, F.A. Cushman, D.A. Pizarro, and A.P. McGraw. 2014. Moral judgment and decision making. In Blackwell reader of judgment and decision making, ed. G. Keren and G. Wu. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    World Health Organization. 2002. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sahar Sobhani
    • 1
  • Anoosheh Ghasemian
    • 1
  • Farshad Farzadfar
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hosein Mashhadinejad
    • 3
  • Bahram Hejrani
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  2. 2.Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research InstituteTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgeryMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations