“A Light Switch in the #Brain”: Optogenetics on Social Media
Neuroscience communication is increasingly taking place on multidirectional social media platforms, creating new opportunities but also calling for critical ethical considerations. Twitter, one of the most popular social media applications in the world, is a leading platform for the dissemination of all information types, including emerging areas of neuroscience such as optogenetics, a technique aimed at the control of specific neurons. Since its discovery in 2005, optogenetics has been featured in the public eye and discussed extensively on social media, but little is known about how this new technique is portrayed and who the users participating in the conversation are. To address this gap, we conducted content analysis of a sample of 1000 tweets mentioning “optogenetics” over a one-year period between 2014 and 2015. We found that academic researchers are the largest group contributing to the conversation, that the tweets often contain links to third-party websites from news organizations and peer-reviewed journals, and that common thematic motifs include the applications of optogenetics specifically for the control of brain activity and the treatment of disease. We also found that the majority of the tweets are neutral in their tone regarding optogenetics. As Twitter serves as a current and dynamic forum for exchange about advances in neuroscience, the conversation about optogenetics on this engaging platform can inform socially-responsive knowledge dissemination efforts in this area.
KeywordsOptogenetics Social media Internet Neuroscience communication
- 4.Twitter Inc. 2016. Twitter. https://about.twitter.com/company. Accessed 8 May 2016
- 6.Conover, Michael, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew R. Francisco, Bruno Gonçalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2011. Political polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 133: 89–96.Google Scholar
- 10.Grunig, James, and Todd Hunt. 1984. Managing public relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
- 11.Sha, Bey-Ling. 2007. Dimensions of public relations: moving beyond traditional public relations models. In New Media and Public Relations, ed. S.C. Duhe, 3–26. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- 20.Illes, Judy, Mary Moser, Jennifer McCormick, Eric Racine, Sandra Blakeslee, Arthur Caplan, Erika Hayden, Jay Ingram, Tiffany Lohwater, Peter McKnight, Christie Nicholson, Anthony Phillips, Kevin Sauvé, Elaine Snell, and Samuel Weiss. 2010. Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. doi:10.1038/nrn2773.Google Scholar
- 25.Krippendorff, Klaus, 2007. Computing Krippendorff’s alpha reliability. Departmental Papers (ASC). http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/43/. Accessed 21 July 2016.
- 31.Mislove, Alan, Sune Lehmann, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Jukka-Pekka Onnela, and J. Niels Rosenquist. 2011. Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
- 33.Smith, Joanna, and Smith, Aaron. 2012. Twitter use 2012. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/05/31/twitter-use-2012/. Accessed 3 August 2016.