Neuroethics

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 275–277 | Cite as

Enharrisment: a Reply to John Harris about Moral Enhancement

Brief Communication

Abstract

In his reply to our response (both in this issue) to his book How to be Good, John Harris accuses us of saying ‘two mutually contradictory things’ (2016: 1) when in fact we talk about two different things. In this short response, we distinguish between moral enhancement and interventions which promote moral behaviour but undermine freedom. We argue that moral enhancement does not necessarily undermine freedom. Interventions, such as the God Machine, which do undermine freedom are not moral enhancements as we conceive of them. But they might nonetheless be justified because freedom must be balanced against other values, such as well-being.

Keywords

Moral enhancement Bioenhancement Freedom Well-being God Machine Reason 

References

  1. 1.
    Clarke, Randolph. 2014. Omissions. New York: Oxford U. P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harris, John 2016 ‘Moral Blindness – A Gift of the God Machine’, this issue, doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9272-9.
  3. 3.
    Harris, John. 2011. Moral Enhancement and Freedom. Bioethics 25: 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Persson, Ingmar & Savulescu, Julian, 2016 ‘Moral Bioenhancement, Freedom and Reason’, this issue, doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9268-5.
  5. 5.
    Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. 2008. The Perils of Cognitive Enhancement and the Urgent Imperative to Enhance the Moral Character of Humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25: 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. 2012. Unfit for the Future. Oxford: Oxford U. P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu J. 2013. Getting Moral Enhancement Right: The Desirability of Moral Bioenhancement. Bioethics 27: 124--131.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savulescu, Julian, and Ingmar Persson. 2012. Moral Enhancement, Freedom and the God Machine. The Monist 95: 399–421.  CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical EthicsUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations