, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 187–198

LIS and BCIs: a Local, Pluralist, and Pragmatist Approach to 4E Cognition

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s12152-016-9267-6

Cite this article as:
Hibbert, R. Neuroethics (2016) 9: 187. doi:10.1007/s12152-016-9267-6


Four previous papers in this journal have discussed the role of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) in the lives of Locked-In Syndrome (LIS) patients in terms of the four “E” frameworks for cognition – extended, embedded, embodied, and enactive (also called enacted) cognition. This paper argues that in the light of more recent literature on these 4E frameworks, none of the four papers has taken quite the right approach to deciding which, if any, of the E frameworks is the best one for the job. More specifically, I argue for an approach that is pragmatist rather than purely metaphysical, pluralist rather than monist, and perhaps most importantly, local to particular research programmes, rather than about BCIs in general. The paper will outline this approach, then illustrate it with reference to a particular research programme which tackles the issue of BCI communication for patients in Complete Locked-In Syndrome (CLIS).


Locked-in syndrome Brain-computer interfaces Extended cognition Enactivism 4E cognition Pluralism 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of KentCanterburyUK

Personalised recommendations