Irrationality and Pathology of Beliefs

Abstract

Just as sadness is not always a symptom of mood disorder, irrational beliefs are not always symptoms of illness. Pathological irrational beliefs are distinguished from non-pathological ones by considering whether their existence is best explained by assuming some underlying dysfunctions. The features from which to infer the pathological nature of irrational beliefs are: un-understandability of their progression; uniqueness; coexistence with other psycho-physiological disturbances and/or concurrent decreased levels of functioning; bizarreness of content; preceding organic diseases known to be associated with irrational beliefs; treatment response to medical intervention, etc. Severe irrationality is sometimes caused by normal human motivation rather than by mental or physical dysfunction. Pure forms of self-deception may satisfy the diagnostic criteria of delusional disorder, but there may be no evidence that suggests that they are caused by illness. Although those with pathological delusions do not recognize their delusions as symptomatic of illness, differentiating pathological beliefs from normal irrational beliefs is vitally important: If a belief is pathological, psychiatrists must seriously consider treating the patient against her will. If it is not pathological, conversely, involuntary treatments are prohibited because they offend her basic autonomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Several authors propose that delusions are not really a type of belief, but rather another type of mental state, such as imagination, illusion, or an intermediate mental state located between belief and non-belief ([24], to mention a few). The chief propositions of the present paper hold true even if delusions are best conceptualized as a mental state other than belief, because not all imaginations, illusions, and intermediate mental states are symptoms of illness. In this paper, without delving deeper into the recent debate between doxasticism and anti-doxasticism about delusions, I will assume that delusions are a kind of belief.

  2. 2.

    Many counterexamples have been raised against the idea that delusions are necessarily false in content. Those counterexamples include such cases as that of a wife who has a delusion of jealousy and whose husband actually is having an affair ([7], p. 106), and cases of the hypochondrical delusion that is expressed in a persistent claim of having gone “mad” ([8], p. 204). However, in these cases, the patients hold them based on wrong reasons. This observation suggests that the essential feature of delusion is epistemic irrationality rather than falsehood.

  3. 3.

    The standard terminology of psychiatry classifies false but persistent suspicions that do not reach conviction as “ideas” or “ideations,” and distinguishes them from delusions. For instance, whereas false and incorrigible convictions that “events, objects, or other persons in one’s immediate environment are seen as having a particular and unusual significance” are called “delusions of reference,” feelings or suspicions with the same content are termed “ideas of reference” ([6], p. 819, 823).

  4. 4.

    This is one of the differentiating features between delusional disorder and schizophrenia. In the former, “[a]part from the impact of the delusion(s) or its ramifications, functioning is not markedly impaired” ([6], p. 90), whereas in the latter, the “level of functioning in one or more major areas, such as work, interpersonal relations, or self-care, is markedly below the level achieved prior to the onset” (Ibid., p. 99), which is associated with volitional or cognitive impairment (Ibid., p. 100).

  5. 5.

    Miyazono rejected four positions, according to which delusions are pathological: (1) they are strange, (2) they are extremely irrational, (3) they are not explained by the folk psychological framework, and (4) responsibility-grounding capacities are impaired in those with delusions [20]. Among them, strangeness corresponds to bizarreness, and inexplicability by folk psychology roughly corresponds to the un-understandability I have already discussed. I agree with Miyazono in that those alternative proposals fail to explain what being pathological consists in. My contention is that the above-mentioned features are good indicators of an underlying dysfunction: Those features are not the criteria of being pathological, but the signs from which to infer the best explanation of the observed phenomena.

  6. 6.

    Murphy writes, “The mother appears to fit the DSM definition of delusion, yet many people I have asked about this case feel the pull of a different position (mothers, especially, feel this)” ([21], p.120). He holds back from definitely calling a case of self-deception a delusion because he restricts the term delusion for pathological cases.

  7. 7.

    Mele also pointed this out; see [43], p. 63.

References

  1. 1.

    Horwitz, Allan V., and Jerome C. Wakefield. 2007. The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hohwy, Jakob, and Vivek Rajan. 2012. Delusions as forensically disturbing perceptual inferences. Neuroethics 5: 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Currie, Gregory. 2000. Imagination, delusion and hallucinations. Mind and Language 15: 168–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tumulty, Maura. 2012. Delusions and not-quite-beliefs. Neuroethics 5: 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rosner, Richard, ed. 2000. Principles and practice of forensic psychiatry, 2nd ed. London: CRC Press.

  6. 6.

    American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

  7. 7.

    Jaspers, Karl. 1963. General psychopathology, trans. J. Hoenig and Marian W. Hamilton. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

  8. 8.

    Fulford, K.W.M. 1989. Moral theory and medical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bortolotti, Lisa. 2010. Delusions and other irrational beliefs. Clarendon: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Cox, Daniel J., Linda Gonder-Frederick, Basim Antoun, Philip E. Cryer, and William L. Clarke. 1993. Perceived symptoms in the recognition of hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 16: 519–527.

  11. 11.

    Lewis, Aubrey. 1934. The psychopathology of insight. British Journal of Medical Psychology 14: 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bortolotti, Lisa. 2012. In defence of modest doxasticism about delusions. Neuroethics 5: 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schneider, Kurt. 1959. Clinical psychopathology, trans. M. W. Hamilton. New York: Grune & Stratton.

  14. 14.

    McKay, Ryan, and Lisa Cipolotti. 2007. Attributional style in a case of Cotard delusion. Consciousness and Cognition 16: 349–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Young, Andrew W. 2000. Wondrous strange: the neuropsychology of abnormal beliefs. Mind and Language 15: 47–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bleuler, Eugen. 1911. Dementia praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenien. Leipzig; Wien: Franz Deuticke.

  17. 17.

    Reznek, Lawrie. 1991. The philosophical defence of psychiatry. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stitch, Stephen P. 1990. The fragmentation of reason: Preface to a pragmatic theory of cognitive evaluation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Wakefield, Jerome C. 1992. The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values. American Psychologist 47: 373–388.

  20. 20.

    Miyazono, Kengo. 2015. Delusions as harmful malfunctioning beliefs. Consciousness and Cognition 33: 561–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Murphy, Dominic. 2013. Delusions, modernist epistemology and irrational belief. Mind and Language 28: 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kapur, Shitij. 2003. Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: A framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 160: 13–23.

  23. 23.

    Maher, Brendan A. 1974. Delusional thinking and perceptual disorder. Journal of Individual Psychology 30: 98–113.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Cooper, Rachel. 2007. Psychiatry and philosophy of science. Stocksfield: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mukherjee, Sukdeb, Sashi Shukla, Joanne Woodle, Arnold M. Rosen, and Silvia Olarte. 1983. Misdiagnosis of schizophrenia in bipolar patients: a multiethnic comparison. American Journal of Psychiatry 140: 1571–1574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sims, Andrew C.P. 2008. Sims' symptoms in the mind: An introduction to descriptive psychopathology, 4th ed. Edinburgh: Saunders.

  27. 27.

    Sims, Andrew C. 1992. Symptoms and beliefs. Journal of the Royal Society of Health 112: 42–46.

  28. 28.

    Cohen, Henry. 1955. The evolution of the concept of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 48: 155–160.

  29. 29.

    Kumral, Emre, and Ozgür Oztürk. 2004. Delusional state following acute stroke. Neurology 62: 110–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed., text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC.: American Psychiatric Association.

  31. 31.

    Frith, C.D. 1987. The positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia reflect impairments in the perception and initiation of action. Psychological Medicine 17: 631–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ramachandran, V.S. 1995. Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition 4: 22–51.

  33. 33.

    Coltheart, Max. 2007. The 33rd Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture Cognitive neuropsychiatry and delusional belief. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60: 1041–1062.

  34. 34.

    Gipps, Richard G.T. 2010. The intelligibility of delusion. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 23: 556–560.

  35. 35.

    McKay, Ryan, Robyn Langdon, and Max Coltheart. 2007. Models of misbelief: Integrating motivational and deficit theories of delusions. Consciousness and Cognition 16: 932–941.

  36. 36.

    McKay, Ryan, Robyn Langdon, and Max Coltheart. 2005. “Sleights of mind”: Delusions, defences, and self-deception. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 10: 305–326.

  37. 37.

    Jaspers, Karl. 1963. Eifersuchtswahn. Ein Beitrag zur Frage: “Entwicklung einer Persönlichkeit” oder “Prozeß”? In Gesammelte Schriften zur Psychopathologie, 85–190. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

  38. 38.

    Mele, Alfred R. 2001. Self-deception unmasked. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Buss, David M., and Martie Haselton. 2005. The evolution of jealousy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 506–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Davies, Anne M. Aimola, Martin Davies, Jenni A. Ogden, Michael Smithson, and Rebekah C. White. 2009. Cognitive and motivational factors in anosognosia. In Delusions and self-deception: Affective and motivational influences on belief formation, eds. Tim Bayne and Jordi Fernández, 187–225. New York: Psychological Press.

  41. 41.

    Bortolotti, Lisa, and Matteo Memeli. 2012. Self-deception, delusion and the boundaries of folk psychology. Humanamente 20: 203–221.

  42. 42.

    Ramachandran, V.S. 1996. The evolutionary biology of self-deception, laughter, dreaming and depression: Some clues from anosognosia. Medical Hypotheses 47: 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mele, Alfred. 2009. Self-deception and delusions. In Delusion and self-deception: Affective and motivational influences on belief, eds. Tim Bayne and Jordi Fernández, 55–69. New York: Psychological Press.

  44. 44.

    Davies, Martin, and Max Coltheart. 2000. Introduction: pathologies of belief. Mind and Language 15: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I have no funding to declare. I thank Kengo Miyazono, who read an early manuscript and provided detailed and enlightening comments. I wish to thank Hajime Honda, Hiroshi Ihara, Kazuya Kawase, Kohji Ishihara, Shigenori Tadokoro, Takeshi Kanasugi, Tetsuya Suzuki, Yudai Suzuki, Yukihiro Nobuhara, and Yutaka Morinaga for giving good feedback in workshops where I presented an early manuscript at the University of Tokyo and Kokugakuin University. I am also indebt to anonymous reviewers whose detailed comments were a great help to me.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eisuke Sakakibara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakakibara, E. Irrationality and Pathology of Beliefs. Neuroethics 9, 147–157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9256-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Delusion
  • Distinction between normality and pathology
  • Irrationality
  • Self-deception