Information Processing Biases in the Brain: Implications for Decision-Making and Self-Governance
- 628 Downloads
To make behavioral choices that are in line with our goals and our moral beliefs, we need to gather and consider information about our current situation. Most information present in our environment is not relevant to the choices we need or would want to make and thus could interfere with our ability to behave in ways that reflect our underlying values. Certain sources of information could even lead us to make choices we later regret, and thus it would be beneficial to be able to ignore that information. Our ability to exert successful self-governance depends on our ability to attend to sources of information that we deem important to our decision-making processes. We generally assume that, at any moment, we have the ability to choose what we pay attention to. However, recent research indicates that what we pay attention to is influenced by our prior experiences, including reward history and past successes and failures, even when we are not aware of this history. Even momentary distractions can cause us to miss or discount information that should have a greater influence on our decisions given our values. Such biases in attention thus raise questions about the degree to which the choices that we make may be poorly informed and not truly reflect our ability to otherwise exert self-governance.
KeywordsAttention Cognitive control Working memory Learning Self-governance
Compliance with Ethical Standards
This work was supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health grant R01-DA013165 and National Endowment for the Humanities grant RZ-50892-08 to S.M.C.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Mack, A., and Irvin Rock. 1998. Inattentional blindness. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 6.Krajbich, I., Dingchao Lu, Colin Camerer, and Antonio Rangel. 2012. The attentional drift diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions. Frontiers in Cognitive Science 3: 193.Google Scholar
- 7.Yantis, Steven, and John Jonides. 1984. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Humann Perception and Performance 10: 601–621.Google Scholar
- 8.Yantis, Steven, and John Jonides. 1990. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16: 121–134.Google Scholar
- 13.Theeuwes, Jan. 1994. Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set - selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 799–806.Google Scholar
- 14.Folk, Charles L., Rodger W. Remington, and James C. Johnston. 1992. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18: 1030–1044.Google Scholar
- 17.Wolfe, Jeremy M., Kyle R. Cave, and Susan L. Franzel. 1989. Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15: 419–433.Google Scholar
- 21.Reynolds, John H., Leonardo Chelazzi, and Robert Desimone. 1999. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. Journal of Neuroscience 19: 1736–1753.Google Scholar
- 23.Courtney, Susan M., Laurent Petit, José M. Maisog, Leslie G. Ungerleider, and James V. Haxby. 1998. An area specialized for spatial working memory in human frontal cortex. Science 279: 1347–1351.Google Scholar
- 24.Courtney, Susan M., Leslie G. Ungerleider, Katrina Keil, and James V. Haxby. 1997. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 386: 608–611.Google Scholar
- 38.Braver, Todd S., Jeremy R. Gray, and C. Burgess Gregory. 2007. Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In Variation in working memory, eds. A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, and J. Towse, 76–106. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 39.Anderson, Brian A. 2014. On the precision of goal-directed attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40: 1755–1762.Google Scholar
- 40.Anderson, Brian A., and Charles L. Folk. 2010. Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: testing a two-process model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72: 342–352.Google Scholar
- 54.Anderson, Brian A. 2013. A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision 13: 1–16.Google Scholar
- 59.Anderson, Brian A., and Steven Yantis. 2013. Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39: 6–9.Google Scholar
- 62.Kyllingsbaek, Søren, Werner X. Schneider, and Claus Bundesen. 2001. Automatic attraction of attention to former targets in visual displays of letters. Perception & Psychophysics 12: 763–764.Google Scholar
- 68.Sali, Anthony W., Brian A. Anderson, and Steven Yantis. 2014. The role of reward prediction in the control of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40: 1654–1664.Google Scholar
- 69.Kamin, Leon J. (1969). Punishment and aversive behavior. B. A. Campbell, R. M. Church Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. 279–296.Google Scholar
- 77.Anderson, Brian A., Sharif I. Kronemer, Jessica J. Rilee, Ned Sacktor, and Cherie L. Marvel. In press. Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV+ individuals. Neurobiology of Disease doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.10.018.
- 79.Gong, M., and Sheng Li. 2014. Learned reward association improves visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40: 841–856.Google Scholar
- 82.Thomas, P. M. J., Lily FitzGibbon, and Jane E. Raymond. 2016. Value conditioning modulates visual working memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42:6–10Google Scholar
- 88.Sali, Anthony W., Brian A. Anderson, and Steven Yantis. 2015. Learned states of preparatory attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 41: 1790–1805.Google Scholar
- 89.McNab Fiona, Peter Zeidman, Robb B. Rutledge, Peter Smittenaar, Harriet R. Brown, Rick A. Adams, and Raymond J. Dolan. 2015. Age-related changes in working memory and the ability to ignore distraction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112: 6515–6518.Google Scholar
- 95.Kohno, Milky, Erika L. Nurmi, Christopher P. Laughlin, Angelica M. Morales, Emma H. Gail, Gerhard S. Hellemann, and Edythe D. London. 2016. Functional genetic variation in dopamine signaling moderates prefrontal cortical activity during risky decision making. Neuropsychopharmacology 41: 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar