Hyperagency and the Good Life – Does Extreme Enhancement Threaten Meaning?
- 477 Downloads
According to several authors, the enhancement project incorporates a quest for hyperagency - i.e. a state of affairs in which virtually every constitutive aspect of agency (beliefs, desires, moods, dispositions and so forth) is subject to our control and manipulation. This quest, it is claimed, undermines the conditions for a meaningful and worthwhile life. Thus, the enhancement project ought to be forestalled or rejected. How credible is this objection? In this article, I argue: “not very”. I do so by evaluating four different versions of the “hyperagency” objection from four different authors. In each case I argue that the objection either fails outright or, at best, provides weak and defeasible grounds for avoiding enhancement. In addition to this, I argue that there are plausible grounds for thinking that enhancement helps, rather than hinders, us in living the good life.
KeywordsEnhancement Hyperagency Meaning of Life Human Flourishing Well-being
The author would like to thank Brian Earp and two anonymous referees for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
- 2.Pacholczyk, Anna, and John Harris. 2013. Dignity and enhancement. In Human dignity in bioethics, ed. Nathan J. Palpant and Stephen C. Dilley. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- 3.Hauskeller, Michael. 2013. Better humans? understanding the enhancement project. London: Acumen.Google Scholar
- 4.Danaher, John. 2013. On the need for epistemic enhancement: Democratic legitimacy and the enhancement project. Law, Innovation and Technology 5(1): 85–112.Google Scholar
- 5.Owens, David. 2007. Disenchantment. In Philosophers without Gods, ed. Louise Antony. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- 6.Smuts, Aaron. Forthcoming. The Good Cause Account of the Meaning of Life. Southern Journal of Philosophy. Author’s version available at https://sites.google.com/site/asmuts/research/download-papers/Smuts_12_TheGoodCauseAccount_version4_20121211.pdf?attredirects=0&d=1 accessed 23/09/2013
- 8.Wolf, Susan. 2010. Meaning in life and Why it matters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- 9.Taylor, Richard. 2008. The meaning of life. In The meaning of life, ed. E.D. Klemke and Steven M. Cahn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 10.Bruckner, Donald. Unpublished. The Subjective Conception of Meaning in Life. Available for download at: http://www.personal.psu.edu/dwb12/blogs/donald_bruckners_webpage/working-papers.html, accessed 23/09/2013
- 12.Lewis, C.S. 2001. The Abolition of Man. New York, NY: HarperCollins. (Originally published 1944)Google Scholar
- 14.Schwartz, Barry. 2004. The paradox of choice: Why less is more. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- 20.Bostrom, Nick. 2008. Why I want to be a posthuman when I grow up. In Medical enhancement and posthumanity, ed. Bert Gordijn and Ruth Chadwick, 107–136. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- 21.Kamm, Frances. 2009. What is and what is not wrong with enhancement? In Human enhancement, ed. J. Savulescu and N. Bostrom. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- 26.Metz, Thaddeus. 2009. Imperfection as sufficient for a meaningful life: How much is enough? In New waves in the philosophy of religion, ed. Y. Nagasawa and E. Wielenberg. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
- 27.Douglas, Thomas. 2013. Enhancing moral conformity and enhancing moral worth. Neuroethics, forthcoming. doi: 10.1007/s12152-013-9183-y.