Skip to main content

On the Criminal Culpability of Successful and Unsuccessful Psychopaths

Neuroethics volume 6, pages 129–140 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

The psychological literature now differentiates between two types of psychopath: successful (with little or no criminal record) and unsuccessful (with a criminal record). Recent research indicates that earlier findings of reduced autonomic activity, reduced prefrontal grey matter, and compromised executive activity may only be true of unsuccessful psychopaths. In contrast, successful psychopaths actually show autonomic and executive function that exceeds that of normals, while having no difference in prefrontal volume from normals. We argue that many successful psychopaths are legally responsible for their actions, as they have the executive capacity to choose not to harm (and thus are legally rational). However, many unsuccessful psychopaths have a lack of executive function that should at least partially excuse them from criminal culpability. Although a successful psychopath's increased executive function may occur in conflict with, rather than in consonance with their increased autonomic activity—producing a cognitive style characterized by selfdeception and articulate-sounding, but unsound reasoning—they may be capable of recognizing and correcting their lack of autonomic data, and thus can be held responsible.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Murphy, J.G. 1972. Moral death: A kantian essay on psychopathy. Ethics 82: 284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fields, L. 1996. Psychopathy, other-regarding moral beliefs, and responsibility. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 3(4): 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morse, S.J. 2008. Psychopathy and criminal responsibility. Neuroethics 1(3): 205–212.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kiehl, K. and J. Buckholtz. 2010. Inside the mind of a Psychopath, In Scientific American. 22–28.

  5. Hughs, V. 2010. Head Case, In Nature.

  6. Murray, K. and J. Castle, K. Sifferd. 2012: Philadelphia. Interview with the author.

  7. Kennett, J. 2002. Autism, empathy and moral agency. The Philosophical Quarterly 52(208): 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Osumi, T., et al. 2007. Psychopathic traits and cardiovascular responses to emotional stimuli. Personality and Individual Differences 42(7): 1391–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hare, R.D., J. Frazelle, and D.N. Cox. 1978. Psychopathy and physiological responses to threat of an aversive stimulus. Psychophysiology 15(2): 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, Y., et al. 2005. Volume reduction in prefrontal gray matter in unsuccessful criminal psychopaths. Biological Psychiatry 57(10): 1103–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, Y., et al. 2010. Morphological alterations in the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in unsuccessful psychopaths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 119: 546–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishikawa, S.S., et al. 2001. Autonomic stress reactivity and executive functions in successful and unsuccessful criminal psychopaths from the community. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 110(3): 423–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Paulhus, D.L., and K.M. Williams. 2002. The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality 36(6): 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hare, R.D. 1991. Manual for the revised psychopathy checklist, 1st ed. Toronto: Multi-Health System.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Morse, S.J. 2000. Rationality and responsibility. Southern California Law Review 74: 251.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hart, H. 1968. Punishment and responsibility: Essays in the philosophy of law. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morse, S.J. 1984. Undiminished confusion in diminished capacity. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 75(1) 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Morse, S.J. 2003. Inevitable Mens Rea. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy. 27.

  19. Knobe, J. 2003. Intentional action and side effects in ordinary language. Analysis 63(3): 190–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Searle, J.R. 2003. Rationality in Action. A Bradford Book.

  21. Sifferd, K.L. 2006. In defense of the use of commonsense psychology in the criminal law. Law & Philosophy 25: 571–612.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hirstein, W., and K.L. Sifferd. 2011. The legal self: Executive processes and legal theory. Conciousness and Cognition 20: 156–171.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moscovitch, and Winocur. 2002. The frontal cortex and working with memory. In Principles of frontal lobe function, ed. D.T. Stuss and R.R. Knight, 188–209. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Burgess, P.W. 2000. Real-world multitasking from a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Control of cognitive processes, ed. S.M.a.J. Driver. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  25. Johnson, M.K., Hayes, S.M., D’Esposito, M.D., and Raye, C.L. ed. 2000. Confabulation. Handbook of Neuropsychology, ed. J.G.a.F. Boller., Elsevier: New York.

  26. Owen, A.M., A.C. Evans, and M. Petrides. 1996. Evidence for a two-stage model of spatial working memory processing within the lateral prefrontal cortex. A positron emission tomography study. Cerebral Cortex 6: 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duncan, J., and A. Owen. 2000. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends in Neurosciences 23(10): 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirstein, W. 2005. Brain fiction: self-deception and the riddle of confabulation. MIT Press.

  29. Baddeley, A., and B. Wilson. 1988. Frontal amnesia and the dysexecutive syndrome. Brain and Cognition 7(2): 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fischer, J.M. and M. Ravizza. 1999. Responsibility and control: A theory of moral responsibility. Cambridge University Press.

  31. Blair, R., D. Mitchell, and K. Blair. 2005. The Psychopath: Emotion and the Brain. Jon Wiley & Sons.

  32. Roskies, A.L. 2003. Are ethical judgements intrinsically motivational? Lessons from “acquired sociopathy”. Philosophical Psychology 16(1): 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kringelbach, M.L. 2005. The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(9): 691–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Motzkin, J.C., et al. 2011. Reduced prefrontal connectivity in psychopathy. The Journal of Neuroscience 31(48): 17348–17357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roskies, A. 2006. Patients with ventromedial frontal damage have moral beliefs. Philosophical Psychology 19(5): 617–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Marsh, A.A., and R.J.R. Blair. 2008. Deficits in facial affect recognition among antisocial populations: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32(3): 454–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Birbaumer, N., et al. 2005. Deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Archives of General Psychiatry 62(7): 799–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Morgan, A.B., and S. Lilienfeld. 2000. A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clinical Psychology Review 20(1): 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Newman, J.P., C.M. Patterson, and D.S. Kosson. 1987. Response perveration in psychopaths. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 96: 145–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang, Y., et al. 2011. Abnormal structural correlates of response perseveration in individuals with psychpathy. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 23(1): 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cleckley, H. 1976. The mask of sanity. St. Louis: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hiatt, K.D., W.A. Schmitt, and J.P. Newman. 2004. Stroop tasks reveal abnormal selective attention among psychopathic offenders. Neuropsychology 18: 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Newman, J.P. and A.R. Lorenz. 2003. Response modulation and emotion processing: Implications for psychopathy and other dysregulatory psychopathology, In Handbook of Affective Sciences, ed. R.J. Davidson, K. Scherer, and H.H. Goldsmith, 904–929. Oxford University Press.

  44. Zeier, J.D., et al. 2012. Cognitive control deficits associated with antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy. Personality Disorders 3(3): 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gao, Y., and A. Raine. 2010. Successful and unsuccessful psychopaths: A neurobiological model. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 28(2): 194–210.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mullins-Sweatt, S.N., et al. The search for the successful psychopath. Journal of Research in Personality 44(4):554–558.

  47. Dolan, M. and R. Fullam. 2010. Moral/conventional transgression distinction and psychopathy in conduct disordered adolescent offenders. Personality and Individual Differences 49:(995–1000).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Blair, R. 1995. A cognitive developmental approach to morality: Investingating the psychopath. Cognition 57: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Levy, N. 2007. The responsibility of the psychopath revisited. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14(2): 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Turiel, E. 1983. The development of social knowledge: morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.

  51. Nichols, S. 2002. Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition 84(2): 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nichols, S. 2004. Sentimental rules: on the natural foundations of moral judgment. Oxford University Press.

  53. James, R., and R. Blair. 1996. Brief report: Morality in the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 26(5): 571–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Blair, R. 1999. Psychophysiological responsiveness to the distress of others in children with autism. Personality and Individual Differences 26(3).

  55. Grant, C., et al. 2005. Moral understanding in children with autism. Autism 9(3).

  56. Kelly, D., et al. 2007. Harm, affect, and the moral/conventional distinction. Mind and Language 22(2).

  57. Hirstein, W. et al. 2001. Autonomic responses of austic children to people and objects. Proceedings of the Royal Society London 268: 1883–1888.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Baird, A.A., and J.A. Fugelsang. 2004. The emergence of consequential thought: Evidence from neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 359(1451): 1797–1804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Dressler, J. 1973–1984. Reaffirming the moral legitimacy of the doctrine of diminished capacity: a brief reply to Professor Morse. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 75(3):953–962.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Rogers, R., W. Seman, and J. Stampley. 1984. A study of socio-demographic characteristics of individuals evaluated for insanity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 28(1): 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Warren, J.I., et al. 1991. Criminal offense, psychiatric diagnosis, and psycholegal opinion: An analysis of 894 pretrial referrals. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 19(1): 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Skeem, J., J. Monahan, and E. Mulvey. 2002. Psychopathy, treatment involvement, and subsequent violence among civil psychiatric patients. Law and Human Behavior 26(6): 577–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Elmhurst College, 190 N. Prospect, Elmhurst, IL, 60126, USA

    Katrina L. Sifferd & William Hirstein

Authors
  1. Katrina L. Sifferd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Hirstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katrina L. Sifferd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sifferd, K.L., Hirstein, W. On the Criminal Culpability of Successful and Unsuccessful Psychopaths. Neuroethics 6, 129–140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9172-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-012-9172-6

Keywords

  • Psychopathy
  • Criminal responsibility
  • Executive function
  • Rationality