, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 369–409

Is There Neurosexism in Functional Neuroimaging Investigations of Sex Differences?

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s12152-012-9169-1

Cite this article as:
Fine, C. Neuroethics (2013) 6: 369. doi:10.1007/s12152-012-9169-1


The neuroscientific investigation of sex differences has an unsavoury past, in which scientific claims reinforced and legitimated gender roles in ways that were not scientifically justified. Feminist critics have recently argued that the current use of functional neuroimaging technology in sex differences research largely follows that tradition. These charges of ‘neurosexism’ have been countered with arguments that the research being done is informative and valuable and that an over-emphasis on the perils, rather than the promise, of such research threatens to hinder scientific progress. To investigate the validity of these contrasting concerns, recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations of sex differences and citation practices were systematically examined. In line with the notion of neurosexism, the research was found to support the influence of false-positive claims of sex differences in the brain, to enable the proliferation of untested, stereotype-consistent functional interpretations, and to pay insufficient attention to the potential plasticity of sex differences in both brain and mind. This, it is argued, creates a literature biased toward the presentation of sex differences in the brain as extensive, functionally significant, and fixed—and therefore implicitly supportive of a gender essentialist perspective. It is suggested that taking feminist criticisms into account would bring about substantial improvement in the quality of the science, as well as a reduction in socially harmful consequences.


Sex/gender fMRI Gender stereotypes Publication bias Gender essentialism Citation bias 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychological SciencesUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Ethical LeadershipMelbourne Business SchoolCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations