Neuroethics

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 115–128 | Cite as

Involuntary & Voluntary Invasive Brain Surgery: Ethical Issues Related to Acquired Aggressiveness

Original Paper

Abstract

Clinical cases of frontal lobe lesions have been significantly associated with acquired aggressive behaviour. Restoring neuronal and cognitive faculties of aggressive individuals through invasive brain intervention raises ethical questions in general. However, more questions have to be addressed in cases where individuals refuse surgical treatment. The ethical desirability and permissibility of using intrusive surgical brain interventions for involuntary or voluntary treatment of acquired aggressiveness is highly questionable. This article engages with the description of acquired aggressiveness in general, and presents a rare clinical case to illustrate the difficulties of treating this population. To expand the debate further, this article explores the ethics related to invasive brain surgery in three parts: a) it examines coercive involuntary invasive brain surgery for the benefit of protecting others on individuals suffering from acquired aggressiveness who lack decision-making capacities to consent; b) it addresses voluntary psychosurgery on individuals suffering from acquired aggressiveness who are competent to consent; and, c) it questions whether acquired aggressive individuals, who are legally competent, have a duty to consent to invasive brain surgery, in order to maintain their autonomy by reducing or even eliminate their aggressive drives. Ensuring the safety and efficacy of surgical brain interventions could increase the ethical permissibility of voluntary treatment, but it would not necessarily entail ethical justification for proceeding with invasive brain surgery for treatment of intractable acquired aggressive behaviour.

Keywords

Acquired aggressiveness Cognitive impairment Decision-making capacity Frontal lobe surgery Involuntary treatment Personality changes 

References

  1. 1.
    Gostin, L. 1980. Ethical considerations of psychosurgery: the unhappy legacy of the pre-frontal lobotomy. Journal of Medical Ethics 6: 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gilbert, F., and Ovadia, D. 2011. Deep brain stimulation in the media: over-optimistic portrayals call for a new strategy involving journalists and scientists in ethical debates. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 5. 16. Epub.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ridder, D.D., B. Langguth, M. Plazier, and T. Menovsky. 2009. Moral Dysfunction: Theoretical Model and Potential Neurosurgical Treatments. In The Moral Brain, Essays on the Evolutionary and Neuroscientific Aspects of Morality, eds. J. Verplaetse, J. de Schrijver, S. Vanneste, J. Braeckman, 155–183. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franzini, A., C. Marras, P. Ferroli, O. Bugiani, and G. Broggi. 2005. Stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus for medically intractable impulsive and violent behavior. Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 83: 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vidor, M. 1951. Personality changes following prefrontal leucotomy as reflected by the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory and the results of psychometric testing. The British Journal of Psychiatry 97: 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lishman, W.A. 1968. Brain damage in relation to psychiatric disability after head injury. The British Journal of Psychiatry 114: 373–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Damasio, H., T. Grabowski, R. Frank, A.M. Galaburda, and A.R. Damasio. 1994. The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science 264(5162): 1102–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ratiu, P., I.F. Talos, S. Haker, S. Lieberman, and P. Everett. 2004. The tale of Phineas Gage, digitally remastered. Journal of Neurotrauma 21(5): 637–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ratiu, P., and I.-F. Talos. 2004. The tale of Phineas Gage, Digitally Remastered. The New England Journal of Medicine 351(23): e21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harlow, J.M. 1868. Recovery from the Passage of an iron bar through the head. Publications of the Massachusetts Medical Society 2: 327–347 (Republished in Macmillan 2000).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Editorial. 1857. The Australian Medical Journal 2: 67–69.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Memorandum Comptroller-General to Governor. 1857. Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office. 16/10/1857. Scripps, L., The Asylum: A report for the Port Arthur Historic site. December 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hampton. 1857. Letter from commandant Boyd to Comptroller-General Hampton. 1857. Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blair, R. 2001. Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 71(6): 727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell, D.G.V., S.B. Avny, and R.J.R. Blair. 2006. Divergent patterns of aggressive and neurocognitive characteristics in acquired versus developmental psychopathy. Neurocase 12(3): 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baguley, I.J., J. Cooper, and K. Felmingham. 2006. Aggressive behavior following traumatic brain injury: How common is common? The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 21(1): 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferguson, S.D., and E.F. Coccaro. 2009. History of mild to moderate traumatic brain injury and aggression in physically healthy participants with and without personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders 23(3): 230–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tateno, A., R.E. Jorge, and R.G. Robinson. 2003. Clinical correlates of aggressive behavior after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 15: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brower, M.C., and B.H. Price. 2001. Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: a critical review. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 71: 720–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Glenn, A.L., and A. Raine. 2008. The neurobiology of psychopathy. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 31: 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barratt, E.S. 1994. Impulsiveness and aggression. In Violence and mental disorders: developments in risk assessment, ed. J. Monahan and H. Steadman, 61–79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krakowski, M., P. Czobor, M.D. Carpenter, et al. 1997. Community violence and inpatient assaults: Neurobiological deficits. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 9: 549–555.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raine, A. 1996. Autonomic nervous system factors underlying Disinhibited, Antisocial, and Violent Behavior Biosocial Perspectives and Treatment Implications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 794(1): 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Starkstein, S.E., and R.G. Robinson. 1997. Mechanism of Disinhibition after brain lesions. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 185(2): 108–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Blair, R.J.R., and L. Cipolotti. 2000. Impaired social response reversal: A case of “acquired sociopathy”. Brain 123: 1122–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morgan, A.B., and S.O. Lilienfield. 2000. A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clinical Psychology Review 20: 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grafman, J., K. Schwab, D. Warden, A. Pridgen, H.R. Brown, and A.M. Salazar. 1996. Frontal lobe injuries, violence, and aggression: A report of the Vietnam Head Injury Study. Neurology 46: 1231–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hare, R.D., and C.S. Neumann. 2008. Psychopathy as a clinical and empirical construct. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 4: 217–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Muller, J.L., et al. 2003. Acquired Psychopathy und die Neurobiologie von Emotion und Gewalt. Psychiat Prax. 30: 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barrash, J., D. Tranel, and S.W. Anderson. 2000. Acquired personality disturbances associated with bilateral damage to the ventromedial prefrontal region. Developmental Neuropsychology 18: 355–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gilbert, F., and S. Johnson. 2011. The impact of football-related concussion in youth athletes. American Journal of Bioethics: Neuroscience. 2(4): 48–59.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mataró, M., M.A. Jurado, C. García-Sánchez, L. Barraquer, F.R. Costa-Jussà, et al. 2001. Long-term effects of bilateral frontal brain lesion: 60 years after injury with an iron bar. Archives of Neurology 58: 1139–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    White, R., and S. Williams. 2009. Amygdaloid neurosurgery for aggressive behaviour, Sydney, 1967–1977: societal, scientific, ethical and other factors. Australasian Psychiatry. Vol 17, No 5.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kiloh, L.G., R.S. Gye, R.G. Rushworth, D.S. Bell, and R.T. White. 1974. Stereotactic amygdaloidotomy for aggressive behaviour. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 37: 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Værnet, K., and A. Madsen. 1970. Stereotaxic amygdalotomy and basofrontal tractotomy in psychotics with aggressive behaviour. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 33: 858–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Clausen, J. 2010. Ethical brain stimulation—neuroethics of deep brain stimulation in research and clinical practice. European Journal of Neuroscience 32: 1152–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sano, K., Y. Mayanagi, H. Sekino, M. Ogashiwa, and B. Ishijima. 1970. Results of stimulation and destruction of the posterior hypothalamus in man. Journal of Neurosurgery 33: 689–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heath, R. 1977. Modulation of emotion with a brain pacemaker: Treatment for intractable psychiatric illness. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 165: 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Heath, R.G., et al. 1980. The Cerebellar pacemaker for intractable behavioral disorders and epilepsy: Follow-up report. Biological Psychiatry 15(2): 243–256.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marin, C., and E. Fernandez. 2010. Biocompatibility of intracortical microelectrodes: Current status and future prospects. Frontiers in Neuroengineering 3, 8: epubGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nakaji, P., H.S. Meltzer, S.A. Singel, et al. 2003. Improvement of aggressive and antisocial behavior after resection of temporal lobe tumors. Pediatrics 112: e430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kaplan, P.W., D.A. Kerr, and A. Olivi. 1999. Ictus expectoratus: a sign of complex partial seizures usually of non-dominant temporal lobe origin. Seizure 8: 480–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Haugh, R.M., and W.R. Markesbery. 1983. Hypothalamic astrocytoma. Syndrome of hyperphagia, obesity, and disturbances of behaviour and endocrine and autonomic function. Archives of Neurology 40: 560–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Villano, J.L., N. Mlinarevich, K.S. Watson, H. Engelhard, and L. Anderson-Shaw. 2009. Aggression in a patient with primary brain tumor: ethical implications for best management. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 94: 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Caplan, R., Y. Comair, D.A. Shewmon, et al. 1992. Intractable seizures, compulsions, and coprolalia: a pediatric case study. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 4: 315–319.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gilbert, F., (forthcoming), Does neuropathology dictate morality? Acquired paedophilia as a neuroethics case. In Morality: Reasoning on Different Approaches, Vasil Gluchman (ed.), Rodopi Publication.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Burns, J.M., and R.H. Swerdlow. 2003. Right Orbitofrontal Tumor with Pedophilia Symptom and Constructional Apraxia Sign. Archive of Neurology. 60: 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Frohman, E.M., T.C. Frohman, and A.M. Moreault. 2002. Acquired sexual paraphilia in patients with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Neurology 59(6): 1006–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mendez, M.F., T. Chow, J. Ringman, G. Twitchell, and C.H. Hinkin. 2000. Pedophilia and temporal lobe disturbances. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 12(1): 71–76.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Miller, B.L., and J.L. Cummings. 1991. How brain injury can change sexual behavior. Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality. 1: 54–62.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Miller, B.L., J.L. Cummings, H. McIntyre, G.A. Ebers, and M. Grode. 1986. Hypersexuality or altered sexual preference following brain injury. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 49: 867–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Baertschi, B., S.A. Hurst, and A. Mauron. 2010. It’s not who you are. American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience. 1(3): 18–19.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Appelbaum, P.S., L.H. Roth, C.W. Lidz, P. Benson, and W. Winslade. 1987. False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. The Hastings Center Report 17: 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kimmelman, J. 2007. The therapeutic misconception at 25: treatment, research, and confusion. The Hastings Center Report 37: 36–42.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hurst, S. 2011. In Clinical research on conditions affecting cognition, ed. J. Illes and B.J. Sahakian. Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    ten Have, H.A., and D. Clarck. 2002. The Ethics of Palliative Care; European Perspectives. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Appelbaum, P.S., C.W. Lidz, et al. 2004. Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors. IRB 26(2): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Singer, M.G. 1959. On Duties to Oneself. Ethics 69(3): 202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    McMahan, J. 2002. The Ethics of Killing; Problems at the Margins of Life. Oxford: New York, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Velleman, J.D. 1999. A right of self-termination. Ethics 109: 606–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kiloh, L.G. 1977. The treatment of anger and aggression and the modification of sexual deviation. In Psychosurgery and Society: A Symposium Organized by the Neuropsychiatric Institute, Sydney, Australia, ed. J.S. Smith and L.G. Kiloh, 45. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gilbert, F. 2012. The Burden of Normality: from ‘Chronically Ill’ to ‘Symptom Free’. New Ethical Challenges for Deep Brain Stimulation Postoperative Treatment. Journal of Medical Ethics. Published online March 19, 2012 doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100044
  63. 63.
    Emanuel, E.J., C. Grady, R.A. Crouch, R. Lie, F. Miller, and D. Wendler. 2008. The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sjostrand, M., and G. Helgesson. 2008. Coercive treatment and autonomy In Psyhiatry Volume 22 Number 2 2008pp 113–120. Bioethics ISSN 0269–9702 (print); 1467–8519 (online).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ethics & Bionics/Nanomedicine, Australian Centre of Excellence for Electromaterials Science (ACES)University of TasmaniaTasmaniaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  3. 3.Institute for Biomedical EthicsGeneva 4Switzerland

Personalised recommendations