, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 307–318 | Cite as

Bad News for Conservatives? Moral Judgments and the Dark Triad Personality Traits: A Correlational Study

Original Paper


This study examined correlations between moral value judgments on a 17-item Moral Intuition Survey (MIS), and participant scores on the Short-D3 “Dark Triad” Personality Inventory—a measure of three related “dark and socially destructive” personality traits: Machiavellianism, Narcissism, and Psychopathy. Five hundred sixty-seven participants (302 male, 257 female, 2 transgendered; median age 28) were recruited online through Amazon Mechanical Turk and Yale Experiment Month web advertisements. Different responses to MIS items were initially hypothesized to be “conservative” or “liberal” in line with traditional public divides. Our demographic data confirmed all of these hypothesized categorizations. We then tested two broad, exploratory hypotheses: (H1) the hypothesis that there would be “many” significant correlations between conservative MIS judgments and the Dark Triad, and (H2) the hypothesis that there would be no significant correlations between liberal MIS judgments and Machiavellianism or Psychopathy, but “some” significant correlations between liberal MIS judgments and Narcissism. Because our hypotheses were exploratory and we ran a large number of statistical tests (62 total), we utilized a Bonferroni Correction to set a very high threshold for significance (p = .0008). Our results broadly supported our two hypotheses. We found eleven significant correlations between conservative MIS judgments and the Dark Triad—all at significance level of p < .00001—but no significant correlations between the Dark Triad and liberal MIS judgments. We believe that these results raise provocative moral questions about the personality bases of moral judgments. In particular, we propose that because the Short-D3 measures three “dark and antisocial” personality traits, our results raise some prima facie worries about the moral justification of some conservative moral judgments.


Personality Morality Psychopathy Narcissism Machiavellianism 


  1. 1.
    Murray, Henry A. (1938). Analysis of the personality of Adolf Hitler (Oxford Press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan, or the matter, forme, and power of a commonwealth, ecclesiasticall and civil.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1782). Confessions of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1762). The social contract, or principles of political right.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1754). Discourse on the origin and basis of inequality among men. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kant, Immanuel (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartels, Daniel M. and David A. Pizarro (in press). The Mismeasure of Morals: Antisocial Personality Traits Predict Utilitarian Responses to Moral Dilemmas. Cognition.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glenn, A.L., A. Raine, and R.A. Schug. 2009. The neural correlates of moral decision-making in psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry 14: 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wright, J.C., and G. Baril. 2011. The role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47: 1007–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feltz, A., and E.T. Cokely. 2009. Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition 18: 342–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graham, J., J. Haidt, and B. Nosek. 2009. Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96: 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, D.N., and D.L. Paulhus. 2010. Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In Handbook of interpersonal theory and research, ed. L.M. Horowitz and S.N. Strack, 249–267. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paulhus, D.L., and K. Williams. 2002. The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality 36: 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones, D.N., and D.L. Paulhus (in press). The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality. Personality and Individual Differences. Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jones, D.N., and D.L. Paulhus. 2010. Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social and Personality Psychology Science 1: 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nathanson, C., D.L. Paulhus, and K.M. Williams. 2006. Personality and misconduct correlates of body modification and other cultural deviance markers. Journal of Research in Personality 40: 779–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gunnthorsdottir, A., K. McCabe, and V. Smith. 2002. Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology 23: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thomas, David (2010). Narcissism: Behind the mask. (Book Guild Ltd.).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Semple, D. 2005. The Oxford handbook of psychiatry. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greene, J.D. 2007. The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In Moral psychology, vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, disease, and development, ed. W. Sinnott-Armstrong. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thomson, J.J. 1976. Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist 59: 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hursthouse, R. 2002. On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press: p. 28.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zagzebski, L. 1996. Virtues of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy & ReligionUniversity of TampaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations