Neuroethics

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 275–283 | Cite as

(A)e(s)th(et)ics of Brain Imaging. Visibilities and Sayabilities in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Original Paper

Abstract

Producing and interpreting functional brain data is part of the negotiation we imagine our brain. To take a closer look at the idea of brain imaging as a form of visual knowledge, it is necessary to put the research of today into a historical context. In my article I will point to a specific approach of functional imaging which depends on historical shifts entangled with the visual aspect of producing pictures of the brain. I will bring out the interaction of issues like techniques, models and historical assumptions of the brain and link them with the way the brain images are presented. The aesthetic dimensions (Rancière) in the pictures are also questions of ethics and normativity.

Keywords

Aesthetic Functional imaging Normativity Gender 

References

  1. 1.
    Rancière, Jaques. 2008. Die Aufteilung des Sinnlichen. Die Politik der Kunst und ihre Paradoxien, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reichert, Ramon. 2007. Im Kino der Humanwissenschaften. Studien zur Medialisierung wissenschaftlichen Wissens; Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burri, Regula Valérie. 2008. Doing images. Zur Praxis medizinischer Bilder. Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cartwright, Lisa. 2001. Practices of looking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burke, James. 1985. The day the universe changed. Little, Brown, and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mitchell, W. J. T. 1986. Iconology: Image, text, ideology. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Latour, Bruno. 1990. Drawings things together. In Representation in Scientific Practice, eds. Michael Lynch, Steve Woolgar, pp. 19–68. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foucault, Micchel. 1973. The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hagner M (1997) Homo Cerebralis. Der Wandel vom Seelenorgan zum Gehirn; BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Canguilhem, Georges. 1980. Gehirn und Denken, lecture. In: Grenzen medizinischer Rationalität: historisch—epistemologische Untersuchungen; Tübingen 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rose, Nikolas. 2007. The politics of life itself. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagner, M. 2006. Der Geist bei der Arbeit. Göttingen: Historische Untersuchungen zur Hirnforschung.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Logothetis, N.K. 2008. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453: 869–878. doi:10.1038/nature06976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Lauretis, Teresa. 1984. Alice doesn’t: Feminism, semiotics, cinema. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carter, Rita. 1999. Mapping the mind. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway; Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haraway, Donna. 1990. Simians, cyborgs, and women. Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rouse, Joseph. 1996. Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schott, Geoffrey D. Colored Illustrations of the Brain: Some Conceptual and Contextual Issues; Neuroscientist first published on June 7, 2010 http://nro.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/05/19/1073858409355817 ; last visit 11/18/2010.
  20. 20.
    Kittler, Friedrich. 2002. Optische Medien. Berliner Vorlesungen 1999; Berlin.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Benjamin, Walter. 1936. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm; last visit 11/18/2010.
  22. 22.
    Lythgoe, Mark. Images that changed the World: Brain Scan; BBC report Tuesday 26 Jan 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gould, Stephan Jay. 1996. The mismeasurement of man. W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations