, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 261–274

The Neurotechnological Cerebral Subject: Persistence of Implicit and Explicit Gender Norms in a Network of Change

Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s12152-011-9129-1

Cite this article as:
Schmitz, S. Neuroethics (2012) 5: 261. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9129-1


Under the realm of neurocultures the concept of the cerebral subject emerges as the central category to define the self, socio-cultural interaction and behaviour. The brain is the reference for explaining cognitive processes and behaviour but at the same time the plastic brain is situated in current paradigms of (self)optimization on the market of meritocracy by means of neurotechnologies. This paper explores whether neurotechnological apparatuses may—due to their hybridity and malleability—bear potentials for a change in gender based attributions that have been historically legitimized by apparently natural differences between women and men. Or, in contrast, which gendered ascriptions are (again) produced in theories and applications according to the normative demands for the bio-techno-social cerebral subject situated in neoliberal power relations. An exploration of three main fields of current developments, the neurotechnological apparatus of brain-computer-interfaces, the technologies for brain tuning and the discourses in neuroeconomics, reveals first insights on these gender aspects in reliance with the ethical/political debate. Moreover, this paper concretizes questions for further research on gender and ethical aspects in the field of neurotechnologies.


Neurotechnologies Neuroenhancement Cerebral subject Optimization Gender and ethics 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Cultural and Social AnthropologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations