, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 265–276 | Cite as

The Ethical Pain

Detection and Management of Pain and Suffering in Disorders of Consciousness
Original Paper


The intriguing issue of pain and suffering in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOCs), particularly in Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome/Vegetative State (UWS/VS) and Minimally Conscious State (MCS), is assessed from a theoretical point of view, through an overview of recent neuroscientific literature, in order to sketch an ethical analysis. In conclusion, from a legal and ethical point of view, formal guidelines and a situationist ethics are proposed in order to best manage the critical scientific uncertainty about pain and suffering in DOCs and ensure the best possible care for the patient.


Disorders of consciousness Vegetative State Minimally Conscious State Pain Suffering Clinical ethics 


  1. 1.
    Schnakers, C., S. Laureys, and M.E. Faymonville. 2009. Ethical implications: Pain, coma, and related disorders. In Encyclopedia of consciousness, vol. 1, ed. W. Banks, 243–250. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Laureys, S., M.E. Faymonville, P. Peigneux, P. Damas, B. Lambermont, G. Del Fiore, et al. 2002. Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state. Neuroimage 17: 732–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wade, D.T. 2001. Ethical issues in diagnosis and management of patients in the permanent vegetative state. British Medical Journal 322: 352–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boly, M., M. Massimini, and G. Tononi. 2009. Theoretical approaches to the diagnosis of altered states of consciousness. In Progress in brain research, ed. S. Laureys et al., 383–398. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Posner, J., C. Saper, N. Schiff, and F. Plum (eds.). 2007. Plum and Posner’s diagnosis of stupor and coma, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Owen, A.M., and M.R. Coleman. 2008. Functional neuroimaging of the vegetative state. Nature Review Neuroscience 9: 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koch, C. 2004. The quest for consciousness: A neurobiological approach. Denver: Roberts and Co.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jennett, B., and F. Plum. 1972. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1: 734–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. 1994. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. Part I. New England Journal of Medicine 330: 1499–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laureys, S. 2007. Eyes open, brain shut. Scientific American 296(5): 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giacino, J.T., S. Ashwal, N. Childs, R. Cranford, B. Jennett, D.I. Katz, et al. 2002. The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58: 349–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schnakers, C., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, J. Giacino, M. Ventura, M. Boly, S. Majerus, et al. 2009. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BioMedCentral Neurology 9: 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merskey, H., and N. Bogduk (eds.). 1994. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms, 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loeser, J.D., and R.D. Treede. 2008. The Kyoto protocol of IASP Basic Pain Terminology. Pain 137: 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schnakers, C., and N.D. Zasler. 2007. Pain assessment and management in disorders of consciousness. Current Opinion in Neurology 20: 620–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Demertzi, A., C. Schnakers, D. Ledoux, C. Chatelle, M.A. Bruno, A. Vanhaudenhuyse, et al. 2009. Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: A European survey of medical and paramedical professionals. Progress in Brain Research 177: 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cassel, E.J. 1982. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine. The New England Journal of Medicine 306: 639–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cassell, E.J., and B.A. Rich. 2010. Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation. Pain Medicine 11: 435–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kassubek, J., F.D. Juengling, T. Els, J. Spreer, M. Herpers, T. Krause, et al. 2003. Activation of a residual cortical network during painful stimulation in long-term postanoxic vegetative state: A 15O-H2O PET study. Journal of the Neurological Science 212: 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jennett, B. 2005. Thirty years of the vegetative state: Clinical, ethical and legal problems. Progress in Brain Research 150: 537–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schiff, N.D., U. Ribary, F. Plum, and R. Llinas. 1999. Words without mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11(6): 650–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perrin, F., C. Schnakers, M. Schabus, C. Degueldre, S. Goldman, S. Brédart, et al. 2006. Brain response to one’s own name in vegetative state, minimally conscious state, and locked-in syndrome. Archives of Neurology 63: 562–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bekinschtein, T.A., D.E. Shalom, C. Forcato, M. Herrera, M.R. Coleman, F.F. Manes, and M. Sigman. 2009. Classical conditioning in the vegetative and minimally conscious state. Nature Neuroscience 12(10): 1343–4351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schacter, D.L. 1994. Priming and multiple memory systems: Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. In Memory systems, ed. D.L. Schacter and E. Tulving, 233–268. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Davis, M.H., M.R. Coleman, A.R. Absalom, J.M. Rodd, I.S. Johnsrude, B.F. Matta, et al. 2007. Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(41): 16032–16037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Panksepp, J. 2000. Affective consciousness and the instinctual motor system: The neural sources of sadness and joy. In The caldron of consciousness: Motivation, affect and self-organization. Advances in Consciousness Research, ed. R. Ellis and N. Newton, 27–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Panksepp, J., T. Fuchs, V.A. Garcia, and A. Lesiak. 2007. Does any aspect of mind survive brain damage that typically leads to a persistent vegetative state? Ethical considerations. Philosophy Ethics and Humanity in Medicine 17(2): 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panksepp, J. 1998. Affective neuroscience, the foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Panksepp, J. 2005. Affective consciousness: Core emotional feelings in animals and humans. Consciousness and Cognition 14: 30–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Boly, M., M.E. Faymonville, P. Peigneux, B. Lambermont, F. Damas, A. Luxen, et al. 2005. Cerebral processing of auditory and noxious stimuli in severely brain injured patients: Differences between VS and MCS. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 15(3–4): 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boly, M., M.E. Faymonville, C. Schnakers, P. Peigneux, B. Lambermont, C. Phillips, et al. 2008. Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: An observational study. Lancet 7: 1013–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Macniven, J.A., R. Poz, K. Bainbridge, F. Gracey, and B.A. Wilson. 2003. Emotional adjustment following cognitive recovery from ‘persistent vegetative state’: Psychological and personal perspectives. Brain Injury 17(6): 525–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wilson, B.A., F. Gracey, and K. Bainbridge. 2001. Cognitive recovery from “persistent vegetative state”: Psychological and personal perspectives. Brain Injury 15(12): 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fins, J.J., J. Illes, J.L. Bernat, J. Hirsch, S. Laureys, and E. Murphy. 2008. Neuroimaging and disorders of consciousness: Envisioning an ethical research agenda. The American Journal of Bioethics 8: 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Syd, L., and M. Johnson. 2010. Implications of recent neuroscientific findings in patients with disorders of consciousness. Neuroethics 3: 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Truog, R.D., M.L. Campbell, J.R. Curtis, C.E. Haas, J.M. Luce, G.D. Rubenfeld, et al. 2008. Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: A consensus statement by the American Academy of Critical Care Medicine. Critical Care Medicine 36(3): 953–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tshibanda, L., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, M. Boly, A. Soddu, M.A. Bruno, G. Moonen, et al. 2010. Neuroimaging after coma. Neuroradiology 52(1): 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Soddu, A., M. Boly, Y. Nir, Q. Noirhomme, A. Vanhaudenhuyse, A. Demertzi, et al. 2009. Reaching across the abyss: Recent advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging and their potential relevance to disorders of consciousness. Progress in Brain Research 177: 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Logothetis, N.K. 2008. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453: 869–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Poldrack, R.A. 2008. The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: Where do we stand? Current Opinion in Neurobiology 18: 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Laureys, S., P. Peigneux, and S. Goldman. 2002. Brain imaging. In Biological psychiatry, vol. 1, ed. H. D’haenen, J.A. den Boer, and P. Willner, 155–166. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bennett, M., and P. Hacker. 2003. Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Uttal, W. 2003. The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Poldrack, R.A. 2006. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cognitive Science 10(2): 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fisher, C.E., and P.S. Appelbaum. 2010. Diagnosing consciousness: Neuroimaging, law, and the vegetative state. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38(2): 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Giordano, J. 2008. Complementarity, brain mind, and pain. Forschende Komplementärmed 15: 71–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pape, T.L., R.G. Senno, A. Guernon, and J.P. Kelly. 2005. A measure of neurobehavioral functioning after coma. Part I: Theory, reliability, and validity of the Disorders of Consciousness Scale. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 42: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pape, T.L., R.G. Senno, A. Guernon, and J.P. Kelly. 2005. A measure of neurobehavioral functioning after coma. Part II: Clinical and scientific implementation. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 42: 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chatelle, C., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, A.N. Mergam, M. De Val, S. Majerus, M. Boly, et al. 2008. Pain assessment in non-communicative patients. Revue Médicale de Liège 63: 429–437.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Demertzi, A., A. Vanhaudenhuyse, M.A. Bruno, C. Schnakers, M. Boly, P. Boveroux, et al. 2008. Is there anybody in there? Detecting awareness in disorders of consciousness. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 8: 1719–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Giacino, J.T., and K. Kalmar. 2004. Coma Recovery Scale Revised. Administration and scoring guidelines. Edison: Center for Head Injuries.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gill-Thwaites, H., and R. Munday. 2004. The Sensory Modality Assessment and Rehabilitation Technique (SMaRT): A valid and reliable assessment for vegetative state and minimally conscious state patients. Brain Injury 18(12): 1255–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schnakers, C., C. Chatelle, A. Vanhaudenhuyse, S. Majerus, D. Ledoux, M. Boly, et al. 2010. The Nociception Coma Scale: A new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness. Pain 148: 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Council of Europe. 1997. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences and World Health Organization. 2002. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Williams, J. 2008. The declaration of Helsinki and public health. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 86(8): 650–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Charlton, E. (ed.). 2005. Core curriculum for professional education in pain. Cap 6. Ethical standards in pain management and research. Seattle: IASP.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wijdicks, E.F., A. Hijdra, G.B. Young, C.L. Bassetti, and S. Wiebe. 2006. Practice parameter: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 67: 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jacobi, J., G.L. Fraser, D.B. Coursin, R.R. Riker, D. Fontaine, E.T. Wittbrodt, et al. 2002. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Critical Care Medicine 30(1): 119–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Young, J., J. Siffleet, S. Nikoletti, and T. Shaw. 2006. Use of a Behavioural Pain Scale to assess pain in ventilated, unconscious and/or sedated patients. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing 22: 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Australian Government. National Health and Medical Research Council. 2008a. Ethical guidelines for the care of people in post-coma unresponsiveness (Vegetative State) or a minimally responsive state.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Australian Government. National Health and Medical Research Council. 2008b. Post-coma unresponsiveness and minimally responsive state. A guide for families and carers of people with profound brain damage.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    New South Wales Department of Health. 2005. Guidelines for end-of-life care and decision making. Available online at
  64. 64.
    Royal College of Physicians. 2003. The Vegetative State: Guidance on the diagnosis and management.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    British Medical Association. 2007. Policy and guidelines for health professionals on advance statements about medical treatment.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    General Medical Council. 2010. Treatment and care towards the end of life: Good practice in decision making.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Strens, L.H., G. Mazibrada, J.S. Duncan, and R. Greenwood. 2004. Misdiagnosing the vegetative state after severe brain injury: The influence of medication. Brain Injury 18: 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    IASP. 1995. Ethical guidelines for pain research in humans.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Casey, K.L. 2010. Pain and consciousness at the bedside. Pain 148(2): 182–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyPontifical Faculty of Theology of Southern Italy, ‘S. Tommaso d’Aquino’, NaplesNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations