Skip to main content
Log in

13N-ammonia positron emission tomography-derived left-ventricular strain in patients after heart transplantation validated using cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking as reference

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Heart transplant rejection leads to cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) can be useful in detecting CAV, as it can evaluate both epicardial vessels and microvasculature. In this study, we evaluated the regional wall motion in heart transplant patients using our PET-specific feature-tracking (FT) algorithm for myocardial strain calculation and validated it using a cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) FT strain as a reference.

Methods

A total of 15 heart transplant patients who underwent both 13N-ammonia PET and CMR within 3 months were retrospectively enrolled. The same slice position of short-axis cine images of the middle slice of left ventricle (LV) and the same slice position of horizontal long-axis cine images were selected for the two modalities to measure the circumferential strain (CS) and longitudinal strain (LS), respectively. Based on the FT technique, time–strain curves were calculated by semi-automatic tracking of the endocardial contour on cine images throughout a cardiac cycle. The peak value in the time-strain curve was defined as the representative value. Correlations of CS and LS between PET and CMR were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients. The inter-modality error of strain measurements was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with two-way random single measures.

Results

Excellent correlations of CS and LS between PET and CMR were observed (CS: r = 0.80; p < 0.01; LS: r = 0.87; p < 0.01). Excellent ICCs were observed (0.89 and 0.85) in CS and LS derived from PET.

Conclusions

We propose the first PET strain showing an excellent agreement with the CMR strain and high reproducibility in measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carvajal-Juarez I, Monroy-Gonzalez A, Espinola-Zavaleta N, Meave-Gonzalez A, Alexanderson-Rosas E. PET/CT with 13N-ammonia: characteristics and utility in coronary artery disease. Ann Nucl Cardiol. 2019;5:63–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, et al. Diagnostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET: added value of myocardial flow reserve. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1230–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Giubbini R, Peli A, Milan E, Sciagr R, Camoni L, Albano D, et al. Comparison between the summed difference score and myocardial blood flow measured by 13N-ammonia. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;2:1621–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fathala A, Aboulkheir M, Shoukri MM, Alsergani H. Diagnostic accuracy of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion imaging with PET-CT in the detection of coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019;9:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Siegrist PT, Tay FM, et al. Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:150–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bravo PE, Bergmark BA, Vita T, Taqueti VR, Gupta A, Seidelmann S, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantification as non-invasive indicator of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:316–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hertz MI, Taylor DO, Trulock EP, Boucek MM, Mohacsi PJ, Edwards LB, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: nineteenth official report-2002. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21:950–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-2498(02)00498-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramzy D, Rao V, Brahm J, Miriuka S, Delgado D, Ross HJ. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a review. Can J Surg. 2005;48:319–27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmauss D, Weis M. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: recent developments. Circulation. 2008;117:2131–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.711911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aranda JM Jr, Hill J. Cardiac transplant vasculopathy. Chest. 2000;118:1792–800. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.118.6.1792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Spes CH, Angermann CE. Stress echocardiography for assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Z Kardiol. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003920070028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spes CH, Mudra H, Schnaack SD, Klauss V, Reichle FM, Uberfuhr P, et al. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:168–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)90391-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawakubo M, Nagao M, Yamamoto A, Nakao R, Matsuo Y, Fukushim K, et al. 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography-derived endocardial strain for the assessment of ischemia using feature-tracking in high-resolution cine imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-021-02677-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakao R, Nagao M, Yamamoto A, Fukushima K, Watanabe E, Sakai S, et al. Papillary muscle ischemia on high-resolution cine imaging of nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography: association with myocardial flow reserve and prognosis in coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02231-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dilsizian V, Bacharach SL, Beanlands RS, Bergmann SR, Delbeke D, Dorbala S, et al. ASNC imaging guidelines/SNMMI procedure standard for positron emission tomography (PET) nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:1187–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Germano G, Erel J, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, Berman DS. Quantitative LVEF and qualitative regional function from gated thallium-201 perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:749–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2002;4:203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawakubo M, Arai H, Nagao M, Yamasaki Y, Sanui K, Nishimura H, et al. Global left ventricular area strain using standard two-dimensional cine MR imaging with inter-slice interpolation. Cardiovasc Imaging Asia. 2018;2:187–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mangion K, Burke NMM, McComb C, Carrick D, Woodward R, Berry C. Feature-tracking myocardial strain in healthy adults- a magnetic resonance study at 3.0 tesla. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arash Salarian (2021) Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22099-intraclass-correlation-coefficient-icc), MATLAB Central File Exchange. Retrieved September 14, 2021.

  21. Costanzo MR, Naftel DC, Pritzker MR, Heilman JK 3rd, Boehmer JP, Brozena SC, et al. Heart transplant coronary artery disease detected by coronary angiography: a multiinstitutional study of preoperative donor and recipient risk factors: Cardiac Transplant Research Database. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17:744–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Erley J, Genovese D, Tapaskar N, Alvi N, Rashedi N, Besser SA, et al. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019;21:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0559-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pryds K, Larsen AH, Hansen MS, Grøndal AYK, Tougaard RS, Hansson NH, et al. Myocardial strain assessed by feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with a variety of cardiovascular diseases - A comparison with echocardiography. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47775-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu VC, Takeuchi M, Otani K, Haruki N, Yoshitani H, Tamura M, et al. Effect of through-plane and twisting motion on left ventricular strain calculation: direct comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:1274-81.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2013.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Khorsand A, Graf S, Eidherr H, Wadsak W, Kletter K, Sochor H, et al. Gated cardiac 13N-NH3 PET for assessment of left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction: comparison with electrocardiography-gated 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:2009–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Syeda B, Höfer P, Pichler P, Vertesich M, Bergler-Klein J, Roedler S, et al. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: a study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:490–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakamura M, Kido T, Kido T, Tanabe Y, Matsuda T, Nishiyama Y, et al. Quantitative circumferential strain analysis using adenosine triphosphate-stress/rest 3-T tagged magnetic resonance to evaluate regional contractile dysfunction in ischemic heart disease. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.04.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MK and MN contributed to the initial design of the project. All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by MN, NK, and AY. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MK, and all authors commented and revised previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michinobu Nagao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawakubo, M., Nagao, M., Kikuchi, N. et al. 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography-derived left-ventricular strain in patients after heart transplantation validated using cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking as reference. Ann Nucl Med 36, 70–81 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01686-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01686-5

Keywords

Navigation