Customized FreeSurfer-based brain atlas for diffeomorphic anatomical registration through exponentiated lie algebra tool

Abstract

Objective

Digital brain template and atlas designed for a specific group provide advantages for the analysis and interpretation of neuroimaging data, but require a significant workload for development. We developed a simple method to create customized brain atlas for diffeomorphic anatomical registration through exponentiated lie algebra (DARTEL) tool using FreeSurfer-generated volume-of-interest (FSVOI) images and validated.

Methods

18F-florbetaben positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data were obtained from 248 participants of Alzheimer’s disease spectrum (from cognitively normal to Alzheimer’s disease dementia). To create a customized atlas, MR images of 84 amyloid-negative controls were first processed with FreeSurfer to obtain individual FSVOI and with DARTEL tool to create DARTEL template. Individual FSVOI images were spatially normalized, and each voxel was then labelled with a VOI label with maximum probability. Using these template and atlas, all images were normalized, and the regional standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) were measured.

Results

18F-florbetaben SUVR values measured with customized atlas showed excellent one-to-one correlation with SUVR measured with individual FSVOI in all regions, and thereby showed almost identical between-group comparison results and outperformed the classic methods.

Conclusions

Customized FreeSurfer-based brain atlas for DARTEL tool is easy to create and useful for the analysis of PET and MR images with high adaptability and reliability for broad research purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Cabezas M, Oliver A, Llado X, Freixenet J, Cuadra MB. A review of atlas-based segmentation for magnetic resonance brain images. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. 2011;104:e158–e177177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Evans AC, Janke AL, Collins DL, Baillet S. Brain templates and atlases. Neuroimage. 2012;62:911–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mandal PK, Mahajan R, Dinov ID. Structural brain atlases: design, rationale, and applications in normal and pathological cohorts. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;31(Suppl 3):S169–S188188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33:341–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Segonne F, Salat DH, et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31:968–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Su Y, D'Angelo GM, Vlassenko AG, Zhou G, Snyder AZ, Marcus DS, et al. Quantitative analysis of PiB-PET with FreeSurfer ROIs. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73377.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Greve DN, Svarer C, Fisher PM, Feng L, Hansen AE, Baare W, et al. Cortical surface-based analysis reduces bias and variance in kinetic modeling of brain PET data. Neuroimage. 2014;92:225–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;7:254–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007;38:95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Matsuda H, Mizumura S, Nemoto K, Yamashita F, Imabayashi E, Sato N, et al. Automatic voxel-based morphometry of structural MRI by SPM8 plus diffeomorphic anatomic registration through exponentiated lie algebra improves the diagnosis of probable Alzheimer Disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1109–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Takahashi R, Ishii K, Miyamoto N, Yoshikawa T, Shimada K, Ohkawa S, et al. Measurement of gray and white matter atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies using diffeomorphic anatomic registration through exponentiated lie algebra: A comparison with conventional voxel-based morphometry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1873–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Martino ME, de Villoria JG, Lacalle-Aurioles M, Olazaran J, Cruz I, Navarro E, et al. Comparison of different methods of spatial normalization of FDG-PET brain images in the voxel-wise analysis of MCI patients and controls. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27:600–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Villemagne VL, Mulligan RS, Pejoska S, Ong K, Jones G, O'Keefe G, et al. Comparison of 11C-PiB and 18F-florbetaben for Abeta imaging in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:983–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kang Y, Na DL. Seoul Neuropsychological screening battery (SNSB). Incheon, South Korea: Human Brain Research & Consulting Co.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984;34:939–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sabri O, Sabbagh MN, Seibyl J, Barthel H, Akatsu H, Ouchi Y, et al. Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer's disease: phase 3 study. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11:964–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 2005;26:839–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from Korean Neurological Association (KNA-19-MI-12), faculty research Grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for (6-2018-0068), Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2017R1A2B2006694) and the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07049386), and a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (Grant Number: HI18C1159).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Young Hoon Ryu or Chul Hyoung Lyoo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baek, M., Cho, H., Ryu, Y. et al. Customized FreeSurfer-based brain atlas for diffeomorphic anatomical registration through exponentiated lie algebra tool. Ann Nucl Med 34, 280–288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01445-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Atlas
  • Template
  • DARTEL
  • FreeSurfer
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Positron emission tomography