Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usefulness of the Chang attenuation correction method with use of a CT-based μ map by FBP reconstruction in 201Tl SPECT-MPI

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Attenuation correction (AC) on nuclear images of non-uniform domains is generally performed by a change of the computed tomography (CT) values to μ values, which are then inserted as components into the detection probability of iterative reconstruction techniques (OS-EM Iterative AC). We established an AC technique which uses a CT μ map based on the Chang AC. Our purpose in this study was to confirm the appropriateness of the Chang AC with the OS-EM and the FBP method (OS-EM Chang AC and FBP Chang AC) by evaluating the results obtained in a phantom and clinical study for 201Tl single-photon emission-computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI).

Methods

Myocardial phantom study and retrospective clinical study were performed. Evaluations for image quality (uniformity and contrast) and image quantitative values [accurate left ventricular (LV) volume and radioactivity] were performed for both studies.

Results

FBP Chang AC showed good image uniformity and proper contrast in phantom and clinical study. Accurate LV volume and radioactivity in the myocardium were also obtained by the phantom study. On the other hand, the number of iterations influenced the image quality both in OS-EM Iterative AC and OS-EM Chang AC in the phantom study. Different numbers of iterations were necessary for obtaining good contrast ratio in each of the anterior and inferior wall, and accurate LV volume.

Conclusions

The number of iterations influences the image quality and quantitative values on OS-EM Iterative Chang AC and OS-EM Chang AC images. In addition, it is difficult to set an appropriate number of iterations for the iterative reconstruction of these images in phantom and clinical studies. Therefore, FBP Chang AC is considered to be clinically useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed tomography

FBP:

Filtered back-projection

SPECT:

Single-photon emission-computed tomography

MPI:

Myocardial perfusion imaging

References

  1. Lang TF, Hasegawa BH, Liew SC, Brown JK, Blankespoor SC, Reilly SM, et al. Description of a prototype emission transmission computed tomography imaging system. J Nucl Med. 1992;33(10):1881–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blankespoor SC, Xu X, Kaki K, Brown JK, Tang HR, Cann CE, et al. Attenuation correction of SPECT using x-ray CT on an emission-transmission CT system: myocardial perfusion assessment. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1996;43(4):2263–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shepp LA, Vardi Y. Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1982;1(2):113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lange K, Carson R. EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8(2):306–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(4):601–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maru S, Yanagisawa M. Basic evaluation of OSEM algorithm by assessing iteration times and number of subsets in a hot spot phantom study. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2001;57(10):1233–9 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nakamura Y, Tomiguchi S, Katsuda N, Takamoto K. Effect of reconstruction parameters on a calculation of left ventricular volumes by OS-EM reconstruction algorithm including various image corrections. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2009;65(7):931–7 (in Japanese).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frey EC, Tsui MW. Collimator-detector response compensation in SPECT. Quant Anal Nucl Med Imaging. 2006;141-166.

  9. Chang LT. A method for attenuation correction in radionuclide computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1978;25(1):638–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang LT. Attenuation correction and incomplete projection in SPECT. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1979;26(2):2780–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ohnishi H, Iida T, Matsuo S, Kida T, Yoshimura M, Noma K, et al. Fundamental evaluation of the ML-EM reconstruction algorithm for SPECT images: resolution, noise, and optimal iterations. J Nucl Med. 2001;57(11):1365–71.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Okada M, Hayashi M, Tsuji H, Akagi H, Okayama K, Narumi Y. Application of collimator broad correction three dimensional ordered subsets expectation maximization for regional cerebral blood flow measurement. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2012;68(5):573–83 (In Japanese).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ishikawa A, Ogawa K. Analytical attenuation correction for non-uniform attenuator in SPECT-comparison with an iterative correction method. Med Imag Tech. 2004;22(4):185–90 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuya Nakamura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakamura, Y., Tomiguchi, S. Usefulness of the Chang attenuation correction method with use of a CT-based μ map by FBP reconstruction in 201Tl SPECT-MPI. Ann Nucl Med 29, 467–473 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-015-0972-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-015-0972-8

Keywords

Navigation