Advertisement

Annals of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 460–466 | Cite as

Performance characteristics of a novel clustered multi-pinhole technology for simultaneous high-resolution SPECT/PET

  • Kenta Miwa
  • Masayuki InubushiEmail author
  • Yasuto Takeuchi
  • Tetsuro Katafuchi
  • Mitsuru Koizumi
  • Tsuneo Saga
  • Masayuki Sasaki
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

Versatile emission computed tomography (VECTor) for small-animal imaging enables fully simultaneous SPECT/PET image acquisition based on clustered multi-pinhole collimation. The present study experimentally evaluated the detailed performance characteristics of the clustered multi-pinhole system for simultaneous 99mTc and 18F imaging from the user perspective.

Methods

Spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate linearity were determined for the VECTor system (MILabs). Two hot-rod micro-resolution phantoms with 6 sectors were created to test the resolution of 99mTc and 18F. Sensitivity and count rate linearity were measured by scanning 99mTc and 18F point sources positioned at the center of the field of view. Furthermore, we quantified the influence of 18F on 99mTc SPECT images. The ratios of SPECT counts on the 99mTc-only and simultaneous 18F-99mTc at various time points were evaluated as a function of the 18F-to-99mTc activity concentration ratio.

Results

The 0.5-mm hot-rods can be visually distinguished in the 99mTc image, and 0.8-mm rods for 18F remained clearly visible. The point-source sensitivity was 2800 cps/MBq for 99mTc and 2899 cps/MBq for 18F, respectively. Count rates up to 120,000 cps for one bed position were linear for the activity. Spill-over from 18F into 99mTc SPECT images was negligible when the activity concentration of the administered 18F solution exceeded that of the 99mTc solution by up to a factor of 2.

Conclusions

We evaluated the performance characteristics of the VECTor that lead to determination of the optimal administered doses of 99mTc and 18F tracers. We found that the VECTor achieved high resolution and high sensitivity as well as good 99mTc and 18F linearity. Simultaneous SPECT/PET imaging with 99mTc and 18F tracers, and stand-alone 99mTc and 18F imaging using clustered-pinhole collimators is feasible and practical for a wide range of research applications using small animals.

Keywords

VECTor Simultaneous imaging Clustered multi-pinhole Small-animal imaging SPECT/PET 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the Department of Molecular Imaging at National Institute of Radiological Sciences for assisting SPECT/PET/CT experiment. This work was supported in part by KAKENHI Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (General) (M.I: No. 22390239, 26293282) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japanese Government, and for Challenging Exploratory Research (M.I: No. 24659140) from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    de Kemp RA, Epstein FH, Catana C, Tsui BM, Ritman EL. Small-animal molecular imaging methods. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(Suppl):18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Umeda IO, Tani K, Tsuda K, Kobayashi M, Ogata M, Kimura S, et al. High resolution SPECT imaging for visualization of intratumoral heterogeneity using a SPECT/CT scanner dedicated for small animal imaging. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(1):67–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Higaki Y, Kobayashi M, Uehara T, Hanaoka H, Arano Y, Kawai K. Appropriate collimators in a small animal SPECT scanner with CZT detector. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27(3):271–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goorden MC, Beekman FJ. High-resolution tomography of positron emitters with clustered pinhole SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(5):1265–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Magota K, Kubo N, Kuge Y, Nishijima K, Zhao S, Tamaki N. Performance characterization of the Inveon preclinical small-animal PET/SPECT/CT system for multimodality imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(4):742–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Visser EP, Disselhorst JA, Brom M, Laverman P, Gotthardt M, Oyen WJ, et al. Spatial resolution and sensitivity of the Inveon small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(1):139–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koba W, Jelicks LA, Fine EJ. MicroPET/SPECT/CT imaging of small animal models of disease. Am J Pathol. 2013;182(2):319–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goorden MC, van der Have F, Kreuger R, Ramakers RM, Vastenhouw B, Burbach JP, et al. VECTor: a preclinical imaging system for simultaneous submillimeter SPECT and PET. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(2):306–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walker MD, Goorden MC, Dinelle K, Ramakers RM, Blinder S, Shirmohammad M, et al. Performance assessment of a preclinical PET scanner with pinhole collimation by comparison to a coincidence-based small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(8):1368–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prasad R, Ratib O, Zaidi H. NEMA NU-04-based performance characteristics of the LabPET-8™ small animal PET scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(20):6649–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sánchez F, Orero A, Soriano A, Correcher C, Conde P, González A, et al. ALBIRA: a small animal PET/SPECT/CT imaging system. Med Phys. 2013;40(5):051906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spinks TJ, Karia D, Leach MO, Flux G. Quantitative PET and SPECT performance characteristics of the Albira Trimodal pre-clinical tomograph. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(3):715–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goorden MC, van der Have F, Kreuger R, Beekman FJ. An efficient simulator for pinhole imaging of PET isotopes. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(6):1617–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vastenhouw B, Beekman F. Submillimeter total-body murine imaging with U-SPECT-I. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(3):487–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ogawa K, Harata Y, Ichihara T, Kubo A, Hashimoto S. A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scatter correction in single photon emission CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1991;10(3):408–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boisson F, Zahra D, Parmar A, Gregoire MC, Meikle SR, Hamse H, et al. Imaging capabilities of the inveon SPECT system using single-and multipinhole collimators. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(10):1833–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deleye S, Van Holen R, Verhaeghe J, Vandenberghe S, Stroobants S, Staelens S. Performance evaluation of small-animal multipinhole μSPECT scanners for mouse imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(5):744–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van der Have F, Vastenhouw B, Ramakers RM, Branderhorst W, Krah JO, Ji C, et al. U-SPECT-II: an ultra-high-resolution device for molecular small-animal imaging. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(4):599–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Branderhorst W, Vastenhouw B, van der Have F, Blezer EL, Bleeker WK, Beekman FJ. Targeted multi-pinhole SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(3):552–61.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanchez F, Moliner L, Correcher C, Gonzalez A, Orero A, Carles M, et al. Small animal PET scanner based on monolithic LYSO crystals: performance evaluation. Med Phys. 2012;39(2):643–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schäfers KP, Reader AJ, Kriens M, Knoess C, Schober O, Schäfers M. Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(6):996–1004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Harteveld AA, Meeuwis AP, Disselhorst JA, Slump CH, Oyen WJ, Boerman OC, et al. Using the NEMA NU 4 PET image quality phantom in multipinhole small-animal SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2011;52(10):1646–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nagy K, Tóth M, Major P, Patay G, Egri G, Häggkvist J, et al. Performance evaluation of the small-animal nanoScan PET/MRI system. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(10):1825–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang Y, Seidel J, Tsui BM, Vaquero JJ, Pomper MG. Performance evaluation of the GE healthcare eXplore VISTA dual-ring small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(11):1891–900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spanoudaki VC, Lau FW, Vandenbroucke A, Levin CS. Physical effects of mechanical design parameters on photon sensitivity and spatial resolution performance of a breast-dedicated PET system. Med Phys. 2010;37(11):5838–49.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Funk T, Sun M, Hasegawa BH. Radiation dose estimate in small animal SPECT and PET. Med Phys. 2004;31(9):2680–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu C, van der Have F, Vastenhouw B, Dierckx RA, Paans AM, Beekman FJ. Absolute quantitative total-body small-animal SPECT with focusing pinholes. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37(11):2127–35.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dewaraja YK, Ljungberg M, Koral KF. Characterization of scatter and penetration using Monte Carlo simulation in 131I imaging. J Nucl Med. 2000;41(1):123–30.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Disselhorst JA, Brom M, Laverman P, Slump CH, Boerman OC, Oyen WJ, et al. Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(4):610–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Visser EP, Disselhorst JA, Lier MGTB, Laverman P, de Jong GM, Oyen WJG, et al. Characterization and optimization of image quality as a function of reconstruction algorithms and parameter settings in a Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner using the NEMA NU4-2008 standards. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2011;629:357–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenta Miwa
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Masayuki Inubushi
    • 4
    Email author
  • Yasuto Takeuchi
    • 1
  • Tetsuro Katafuchi
    • 5
  • Mitsuru Koizumi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tsuneo Saga
    • 1
  • Masayuki Sasaki
    • 3
  1. 1.Molecular Imaging CenterNational Institute of Radiological SciencesChibaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear MedicineCancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Division of Medical Quantum Science, Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  4. 4.Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of RadiologyKawasaki Medical SchoolOkayamaJapan
  5. 5.Department of Radiological TechnologyGifu University of Medical ScienceGifuJapan

Personalised recommendations