Skip to main content
Log in

Predictive value of volumetric parameters measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT for lymph node status in patients with surgically resected rectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive role of volumetric parameters such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT for regional lymph node (rLN) metastasis in rectal cancer patients.

Methods

Retrospectively, 74 rectal cancer patients were enrolled. All patients received surgical treatment and F-18 FDG PET/CT at diagnosis. The F-18 FDG PET/CT findings of primary cancer and rLN involvement were compared with the pathologic diagnosis within 5 weeks after operation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to analyze the associations among the pathologic LN status and age, sex, T stage, AJCC stage, SUVmax, lymphatic invasion, venous invasion, neural invasion, and volumetric parameters.

Results

The LN (+) group showed statistically significant higher values of MTV2.5 (p < 0.0001), MTV3 (p < 0.0001), MTV3.5 (p = 0.0001), TLG2.5 (p = 0.0007), TLG3 (p = 0.0011), and TLG3.5 (p = 0.0024). In univariate analysis, T stage, AJCC stage, neural invasion, and volumetric parameters were factors significantly associated with pathologic LN involvement. However, in multivariate analysis, advanced T stage, high AJCC stage, MTV2.5, and TLG2.5 were associated with pathologic LN involvement in rectal cancer.

Conclusion

This study showed that, not only T stage and AJCC stage, but also volumetric parameters such as MTV2.5 and TLG2.5 are useful factors for the prediction of pathologic LN status in rectal cancer patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Naishadam D, Siegel R, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. O`Dwyer ST, Haboubi NY, Johnson JS, Gardy R. Detection of lymph node metastases in colorectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis. 2001;3:288–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging- a meta-analysis. Radiology. 2004;232:773–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shin SS, Jeong YY, Min JJ, Kim HR, Chung TW, Kang HK. Preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: CT versus integrated FDG PET/CT. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:270–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi BW, Zeon SK, Kim SH, Jo I, Kim HW, Won KS. Significance of SUV on follow-up F-18 FDG PET at the anastomotic site of gastroduodenostomy after distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:285–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song BI, Hong CM, Lee HJ, Kang S, Jeong SY, Kim HW, et al. Prognostic value of primary tumor uptake on F-18 FDG PET/CT in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:117–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee M, Lee Y, Hwang KH, Choe W, Park CY. Usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT in assessment of recurrence of cervical cancer after treatment. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:111–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim SH, Won KS, Choi BW, Choi BW, Zeon SK, Chung WJ, et al. Usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of early treatment response after interventional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;46:102–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hyun SH, Choi JY, Shim YM, Kim K, Lee SJ, Cho YS, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:115–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoo J, Choi JY, Lee KT, Heo JS, Park SB, Moon SH, et al. Prognostic significance of volume-based metabolic parameters by 18F-FDG PET/CT in gallbladder cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;46:201–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoo SW, Kim J, Chong A, et al. Metabolic tumor volume measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT can further stratify the prognosis of patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;46:286–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim J, Yoo SW, Kang SR, et al. Prognostic significance of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT in operable primary breast cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;46:278–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. HS I, Kim SJ, Kim IJ, Kim K. Predictive value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-FDG PET for regional lymph node status in patients with esophageal cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:442–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kato H, Miyazaki T, Nakajima M, Takita J, Kimura H, Faried A, et al. The incremental effect of positron emission tomography on diagnostic accuracy in the initial staging of esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:148–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mochiki E, Kuwano H, Katoh H, Asao T, Oriuchi N, Endo K. Evaluation of 18F-2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography for gastric cancer. World J Surg. 2004;28:247–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang C, Chen Y, Xue H, Zheng P, Tong J, Liu J, et al. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:167–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Deleau C, Buecher B, Rousseau C, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Flamant M, des Varannes SB, et al. Clinical impact of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scan/computed tomography in comparison with computed tomography on the detection of colorectal cancer recurrence. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Frankel TL, Gian RK, Jarnagin WR. Preoperative imaging for hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastasis. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2012;3:11–8.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bamba Y, Itabashi M, Kameoka S. Value of PET/CT imaging for diagnosing pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:1972–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsunoda Y, Ito M, Fujii H, Kuwano H, Saito N. Preoperative diagnosis of lymph node metastases of colorectal cancer by FDG-PET/CT. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008;38:347–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu YY, Chen JH, Ding HJ, Chien CR, Lin WY, Kao CH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of pretherapeutic lymph node staging of colorectal cancer by 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:1127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Skibber JM, Minsky BD, Hoff PM. Principles and practice of oncology. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer of the colon., CancerPhiladelphia: Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 1216–71.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carrington BM. Lymph node metastases. In: Husband JES, Reznek RH, editors. Imaging in oncology. London: Taylor & Francis; 2004. p. 999–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brush J, Boyd K, Chappell F, Crawford F, Dozier M, Fenwick E, et al. The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:1–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Seol YM, Kwon BR, Song MK, Choi YJ, Shin HJ, Chung JS, et al. Measurement of tumor volume by PET to evaluate prognosis in patients with head and neck cancer treated by chemo-radiation therapy. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:201–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee HY, Hyun SH, Lee KS, Kim BT, Kim J, Shim YM, et al. Volume-based parameter of 18F-FDG PET/CT in malignant pleural mesothelioma: prediction of therapeutic response and prognostic implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2787–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xie P, Yue JB, Zhao HX, Sun XD, Kong L, Fu Z, et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT metabolic index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:883–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chung MK, Jeong HS, Park SG, Jang JY, Son YI, Choi JY, et al. Metabolic tumor volume of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts short-term outcome to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in pharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5861–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chung HH, Kim JW, Han KH, Eo JS, Kang KW, Park NH, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by FDG-PET/CT in patients with cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;120:270–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is supported by 2 Year Research Grant of Pusan National University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Jang Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jo, H.J., Kim, SJ., Kim, I.J. et al. Predictive value of volumetric parameters measured by F-18 FDG PET/CT for lymph node status in patients with surgically resected rectal cancer. Ann Nucl Med 28, 196–202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0809-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0809-x

Keywords

Navigation