Annals of Nuclear Medicine

, Volume 26, Issue 10, pp 787–793 | Cite as

Discrepancy of left and right hip bone mineral density (BMD) in Thai women: diagnostic agreement and misclassification

  • Sirianong Namwongprom
  • Sattaya Rojnastein
  • Ampica Mangklabruks
  • Suppasin Soontrapa
  • Potjaman Taya
  • Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul
Original article



To determine the diagnostic agreement and the degree of misclassification when using data from the left and right hips.


The cross-sectional study of 1,943 perimenopausal and postmenopausal Thai women, who had bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at the left (non-dominant) and right hips for the screening of low bone mass (LBM) or osteoporosis (OP) in the Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University from September 2008 to August 2010 was performed. The kappa statistic was used to assess diagnostic agreement. The prevalence of LBM and OP and the percentage of misclassification were reported.


There was a significant correlation between the left and right BMD values for the femoral neck (FN) (r2 = 0.83; p < 0.001) and the total hip (TH) (r2 = 0.89; p < 0.001). The diagnostic agreement of the FN and TH regions was significant in all study groups ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 (p < 0.001). For the final diagnosis, which is based on the least T-score of the FN or TH regions, the diagnostic agreement was 0.73 for all women, 0.77 for perimenopausal women, 0.73 for postmenopausal women, 0.70 for postmenopausal women age less than 65 years and 0.71 for postmenopausal women age greater than or equal to 65 years. The percentage of misclassification for all women was 16.9 %, with 3.3 % being downgraded from normal to LBM and 3.4 % from LBM to OP.


Despite the fact that good diagnostic agreement was demonstrated in this study, a significant number of diagnostic discordance between left and right hips (16.9 %) was also observed. BMD measurements of both hips are recommended for diagnosing LBM and OP in clinical practice.


Bone mineral density Discrepancy Osteoporosis Diagnostic agreement Misclassification 


  1. 1.
    Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1137–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Faulkner KG, Genant HK, McClung M. Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcif Tissue Int. 1995;56:26–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonnick SL, Nichols DL, Sanborn CF, Payne SG, Moen SM, Heiss CJ. Right and left proximal femur analyses: is there a need to do both? Calcif Tissue Int. 1996;58:307–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franck H, Munz M, Scherrer M. Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;61:445–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rao AD, Reddy S, Rao DS. Is there a difference between right and left femoral bone density? J Clin Densitom. 2000;3:57–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lessig HJ, Meltzer MS, Siegel JA. The symmetry of hip bone mineral density. A dual photon absorptiometry approach. Clin Nucl Med. 1987;12:811–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hall ML, Heavens J, Ell PJ. Variation between femurs as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Eur J Nucl Med. 1991;18:38–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang RS, Chieng PU, Tsai KS, Liu TK. Symmetry of bone mineral density in the hips is not affected by age. Nucl Med Commun. 1996;17:711–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang R, Tsai K, Chieng P, Liu T. Symmetry of bone mineral density at the proximal femur with emphasis on the effect of side dominance. Calcif Tissue Int. 1997;61:189–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lipton RB, Liao Y, Cao G, Cooper RS, McGee D. Determinants of incident non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus among blacks and whites in a national sample. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138:826–39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thurlow GA, Bowling DB, Cooper RM. ON and OFF activity gradients in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: a combined 14C 2-deoxyglucose and d, l-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid study. Vis Neurosci. 1993;10:1027–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petley GW, Taylor PA, Murrills AJ, Dennison E, Pearson G, Cooper C. An investigation of the diagnostic value of bilateral femoral neck bone mineral density measurements. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:675–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wong JC, McEwan L, Lee N, Griffiths MR, Pocock NA. The diagnostic role of dual femur bone density measurement in low-impact fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14:339–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooper C, O’Neill T, Silman A. The epidemiology of vertebral fractures. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group. Bone. 1993;14(Suppl 1):S89–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wasnich RD. Vertebral fracture epidemiology. Bone. 1996;18:179S–83S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Melton LJ 3rd. Epidemiology of spinal osteoporosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:2S–11S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jitapunkul S, Thamarpirat J, Chaiwanichsiri D, Boonhong J. Incidence of vertebral fractures in Thai women and men: a prospective population-based study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2008;8:251–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cole R, Larson J. The effect of measurement of the contralateral hip if the spine is not included in the bone mineral density analysis. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:210–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sirianong Namwongprom
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sattaya Rojnastein
    • 3
  • Ampica Mangklabruks
    • 4
  • Suppasin Soontrapa
    • 5
  • Potjaman Taya
    • 2
  • Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul
    • 6
  1. 1.Clinical Epidemiology Program, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  4. 4.Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  5. 5.Department of Orthopaedic, Faculty of MedicineKhon Kaen UniversityKhon KaenThailand
  6. 6.Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations