Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement of image resolution of brain SPECT by use of the wide-angle offset acquisition method

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Cerebral SPECT images require high spatial and contrast resolution for precise evaluation of the abnormal tracer distribution in the brain. A shorter data acquisition time is preferable so that artifacts due to patient movement are avoided. We tried to shorten data acquisition time applying larger sampling angle and offset acquisition method, in which half degree of the step angle was shifted in the opposite gamma camera of the dual-detector SPECT system.

Methods

A simulation study was performed with a 3-dimensional mathematical phantom. The phantom studies were performed with a hot-rod phantom and a brain phantom. A clinical study with 99mTc-ECD SPECT was also performed on a patient who had a cerebral infarction. Reconstruction of images was done for the normal 6° and 12° onset and 12° offset. Data for the 12° offset were acquired by shifting of sampling angles of the opposite detector by half (6°) of the sampling angles of 12°. The MLEM algorithm was used for image reconstruction. Image qualities in the simulation study, the phantom studies, and the clinical study were compared for the 6° and 12° onset, and for the 12° offset by quantitative analysis with use of profile curves.

Results

Analysis of the profile curves revealed that the image quality of the 12° offset was better than that of the 12° onset and compared to that of the 6° onset in the simulation study, the phantom studies, and the clinical study.

Conclusions

The present study indicates that wide-angle offset data acquisition improves the image resolution of brain SPECT compared to onset data acquisition with the same sampling time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Takahashi Y, Murase K, Higashino H, Mochizuki T, Motomura N. SPECT imaging with off-set detector system: comparison among sampling angles 2, 4, and 6 degrees. Ann Nucl Med. 2002;16:363–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheep LA, Vardi Y. Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 1982;MI-1:113–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murase K, Tanada S, Inoue T, Sugawara T, Hamamoto K. Improvement of brain single photon emission tomography (SPET) using transmission data acquisition in a four-head SPET scanner. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:32–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Motomura N, Onishi H, Shirakawa S, Takahashi M, Yanagisawa M. Research report: development of a digital phantom for nuclear medicine. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2007;63:1313–9. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Onishi H, Motomura N, Takahashi M, Yanagisawa M, Ogawa K. A 3-dimensional mathematic cylinder phantom for the evaluation of the fundamental performance of SPECT. J Nucl Med Technol. 2010;38:42–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yamaki N, Natsume T, Takeda K, Maeda H, Hasabe S, Kinda A, et al. Simultaneous spatial resolution correction in SPECT reconstruction using OS-EM algorithm. Jpn J Med Phys. 2004;24:61–71. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ogawa K. Image reconstruction by ordered subsets expectation maximization method. Jpn J Med Phys. 1999;19:184–92. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Asao K, Takeda H, Takaki A, Kawakami K, Teraoka S. Evaluation of the OS-EM parameter with automatic quantitative analysis for cerebral blood flow of the ECD tool. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2008;64:822–31. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shinohara H, Yamamoto T, Sugimoto H, Hashimoto T, Takahashi M, Yokoi T. Scatter, attenuation and detector response correction of SPECT. Med Imag Tech. 2000;18:24–32. (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi Y, Murase K, Mochizuki T, Higashino H, Sugawara Y, Kinda A. Evaluation of the number of SPECT projections in the ordered subsets-expectation maximization image reconstruction method. Ann Nucl Med. 2003;17:525–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka E, Kudo H. Subset-dependent relaxation in block-iterative algorithms for image reconstruction in emission tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48:1405–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanetaka H, Matsuda H, Asada T, Ohnishi T, Yamashita F, Imabayashi E, et al. Effects of partial volume correction on discrimination between very early Alzheimer’s dementia and controls using brain perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:975–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr Akiyoshi Kinda (Toshiba Medical Systems Co., Ltd.), Ms Kyoko Saito, Mr Yoshihisa Nishimura, and Ms Mika Takahashi (Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences) for technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuyuki Takahashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, Y., Oriuchi, N., Higashino, H. et al. Improvement of image resolution of brain SPECT by use of the wide-angle offset acquisition method. Ann Nucl Med 25, 69–74 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-010-0430-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-010-0430-6

Keywords

Navigation