Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preliminary study on potential of the jPET-D4 human brain scanner for small animal imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

One trend in positron emission tomography (PET) instrumentation over the last decade has been the development of scanners dedicated to small animals such as rats and mice. Thicker crystals, which are necessary to obtain higher sensitivity, result in degraded spatial resolution in the peripheral field-of-view (FOV) owing to the parallax error. On the other hand, we are developing the jPET-D4, which is a dedicated human brain PET scanner that has a capability for depth-of-interaction (DOI) measurement. Although its crystal width is about twice that of commercially available small animal PET scanners, we expect the jPET-D4 to have a potential for small animal imaging by making full use of the DOI information. In this article, we investigate the jPET-D4’s potential for small animal imaging by comparing it with the microPET Focus220, a state-of-the-art PET scanner dedicated to small animals.

Methods

The jPET-D4 uses four-layered GSO crystals measuring 2.9 mm × 2.9 mm × 7.5 mm, whereas the microPET Focus220 uses a single layer of LSO crystals measuring 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm × 10.0 mm. First, the absolute sensitivity, counting rate performance and spatial resolution of both scanners were measured. Next a small hot-rod phantom was used to compare their imaging performance. Finally, a rat model with breast tumors was imaged using the jPET-D4.

Results

Thanks to the thicker crystals and the longer axial FOV, the jPET-D4 had more than four times higher sensitivity than the microPET Focus220. The noise equivalent counting-rate performance of the jPETD4 reached 1,024 kcps for a rat-size phantom, whereas that of the microPET Focus220 reached only 165 kcps. At the center of the FOV, the resolution was 1.7 mm for the microPET Focus220, whereas it was 3.2 mm for the jPET-D4. On the other hand, the difference of resolution became smaller at the off-center position because the radial resolution degraded faster for the microPET Focus220. The results of phantom imaging showed that the jPET-D4 was comparable to the microPET Focus220 at the off-center position even as the microPET Focus220 outperformed the jPET-D4 except for the peripheral FOV.

Conclusions

The jPET-D4 human brain PET scanner, which was designed to achieve not only high resolution but also high sensitivity by measuring DOI information, was proven to have a potential for small animal imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cherry SR, Gambhir SS. Impact of noninvasive technology on animal research. Inst Lab Animal Res J 2001;42:219–232.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cherry SR. In vivo molecular and genomic imaging: new challenges for imaging physics. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:R13–R48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jagoda EM, Vaquero JJ, Seidel J, Green MV, Eckelman WC. Experiment assessment of mass effects in the rat: implications for small animal PET imaging. Nucl Med Biol 2004;31:771–779.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hume SP, Myers R. Dedicated small animal scanners: a new tool for drug development? Curr Pharm Des 2002;8:1497–1511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Funk T, Sun M, Hasegawa BH. Radiation dose estimate in small animal SPECT and PET. Med Phys 2004;31:2680–2687.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stickel JR, Cherry SR. High-resolution PET detector design: modeling components of intrinsic spatial resolution. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:179–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe M, Okada H, Shimizu K, Omura T, Yoshikawa E, Kosugi T, et al. A high resolution animal PET scanner using compact PS-PMT detectors. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1997;44:1277–1282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cherry SR, Shao Y, Silverman RW, Meadors K, Siegel S, Chatziioannou A, et al. MicroPET: a high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1997;44:1161–1166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Del Guerra A, Di Domenico G, Scandola M, Zavattini G. YAP-PET: first results of a small animal positron emission tomograph based on YAP:Ce finger crystals. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1998;45:3105–3108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tai YC, Chatziioannou A, Siegel S, Young J, Newport D, Goble RN, et al. Performance evaluation of the microPET P4: a PET system dedicated to animal imaging. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:1845–1862.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumura A, Mizokawa S, Tanaka M, Wada Y, Nozaki S, Nakamura F, et al. Assessment of microPET performance in analyzing the rat brain under different types of anesthesia: comparison between quantitative data obtained with microPET and ex vivo autoradiography. NeuroImage 2003;20:2040–2050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Knoess C, Siegel S, Smith A, Newport D, Richerzhagen N, Winkeler A, et al. Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:737–747.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Surti S, Karp JS, Perkins AE, Freifelder R, Muehllehner G. Design evaluation of A-PET: a high sensitivity animal PET camera. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50:1357–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fontaine R, Bélanger F, Viscogliosi N, Semmaoui H, Tétrault M-A, Michaud J-B, et al. The architecture of LabPET. A small animal APD-based digital PET scanner. Nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference record 2005. New York: IEEE 2005, p. J02–3.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Laforest R, Siegel S, Newport DF, Yap J. Performance evaluation of the microPET-Focus-F120. Nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference record 2005. New York: IEEE 2004, p. M05–118.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tai YC, Ruangma A, Rowland D, Siegel S, Newport DF, Chow PL, et al. Performance evaluation of the microPET Focus: a third-generation microPET scanner dedicated to animal imaging. J Nucl Med 2005;46:455–463.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishikido F, Tsuda T, Yoshida E, Inadama N, Shibuya K, Yamaya T, et al. Spatial resolution evaluation with a pair of two four-layer DOI detectors for small animal PET scanner: jPET-RD. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2008;584:212–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wienhard K, Schmand M, Casey ME, Baker K, Bao J, Eriksson L, et al. The ECAT HRRT: performance and first clinical application of the new high-resolution research tomograph. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2002;49:104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seidel J, Vaquero JJ, Green MV. Resolution uniformity and sensitivity of the NIH ATLAS small animal PET scanner: comparison to simulated LSO scanners without depth-of-interaction capability. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50:1347–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziemons K, Auffray E, Barbier R, Brandenburg G, Bruyndonckx P, Choi Y, et al. The ClearPET project: development of a 2nd generation high-performance small animal PET scanner. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2005;537:307–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto S, Mashino H, Kudo H, Matsumoto K, Senda M. A dual layer GSO PET system for small animal: K-PET II. IFMBE Proc 2006;14:1712–1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohi J, Tonami H. Investigation of a whole-body DOI-PET system. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 2007;571:223–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamada R, Watanabe M, Omura T, Sato N, Shimizu K, Takahashi M, et al. Development of a small animal PET scanner using DOI detectors. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2008;55:906–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Murayama H, Ishibashi H, Uchida H, Omura T, Yamashita Y. Depth encoding multicrystal detectors for PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1998;45:1152–1157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Inadama N, Murayama H, Omura T, Yamashita T, Yamamoto S, Ishibashi H, et al. A depth of interaction detector for PET with GSO crystals doped with different amounts of Ce. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2002;49:629–633.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamaya T, Yoshida E, Lam CF, Konami A, Obi T, Murayama H. Implementation of 3D image reconstruction with a precomputed system matrix for the jPET-D4. Conference record of 9th international meeting on fully three-dimensional image reconstruction in radiology and nuclear medicine; 2007. p. 92–95.

  27. Yoshida E, Kobayashi A, Yamaya T, Watanabe M, Nishikido F, Kitamura K, et al. The jPET-D4: performance evaluation of four-layer DOI-PET scanner using the NEMA NU2-2001 standard. Nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference record. New York: IEEE; 2006. p. M11–146.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yamaya T, Hagiwara N, Obi T, Yamaguchi M, Kita K, Ohyama N, et al. DOI-PET image reconstruction with accurate system modeling that reduces redundancy of the imaging system. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2003;50:1404–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Knoess C, Lenox M, Goble RN, Siegel S, Smith AM, Vollmar S, et al. Comparative study of ECAT HRRT and microPET R4 for animal PET studies. Nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference record. New York: IEEE; 2002. p. M03–171.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Molecular Imaging Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan

    Taiga Yamaya, Eiji Yoshida, Chie Toramatsu, Naoko Inadama, Kengo Shibuya, Fumihiko Nishikido & Hideo Murayama

  2. Research Center for Radiation Protection, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan

    Mayumi Nishimura & Yoshiya Shimada

  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA

    Chie Toramatsu

Authors
  1. Taiga Yamaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eiji Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chie Toramatsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mayumi Nishimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yoshiya Shimada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Naoko Inadama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kengo Shibuya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fumihiko Nishikido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hideo Murayama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taiga Yamaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamaya, T., Yoshida, E., Toramatsu, C. et al. Preliminary study on potential of the jPET-D4 human brain scanner for small animal imaging. Ann Nucl Med 23, 183–190 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0224-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0224-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation