Abstract
This article analyzes sex differences in high school seniors' propensity to enlist in the military, differences between military preferences and expectations, sex differences in the relationship between propensity and actual service, effects of background and educational characteristics, and post-high school activities of men and women who do not serve. Using data from the Monitoring the Future surveys, we find that young women's propensity to serve is lower than men's, but more women desire than expect to serve. The relationship between propensity and service is weaker for women than men and has not increased over time. Background characteristics and educational achievement and plans are less predictive of women's propensity and enlistment than men's, with the exception of higher race and ethnicity effects among women. Having children has a small negative effect on high propensity women's enlistment, but an even stronger positive effect on low propensity men's enlistment. More women desire and expect to serve than the military is enlisting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asch, Beth, and Bruce Orvis. 1994. Recent Recruiting Trends and Their Implications: Preliminary Analysis and Recommendations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Bachman, Jerald G., Peter Freedman-Doan, David R. Segal, & Patrick M. O'Malley. 1997. Trends in Military Propensity and the Propensity-Enlistment Relationship. MtF Occasional Paper No. 40. Ann Arbor, MI: The Institute for Social Research.
Bachman, Jerald G., Lloyd D. Johnston, & Patrick M. O'Malley. 1996. The Monitoring the Future Project after Twenty-Two Years: Design and Procedures. MtF Occasional Paper No. 38. Ann Arbor, MI: The Institute for Social Research.
Bachman, Jerald G., David R. Segal, Peter Freedman-Doan, and Patrick M. O'Malley. Forthcoming a. “Military Propensity and the Propensity-Enlistment Relationship.” Armed Forces & Society.
Bachman, Jerald G., David R. Segal, Peter Freedman-Doan, and Patrick M. O'Malley. Forthcoming b. “Who Chooses Military Service? Correlates of Propensity and Enlistment in the United States Armed Forces.” Military Psychology.
Binkin, Martin, and Shirley J. Bach. 1977. Women and the Military. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Daula, T.V., and D.A. Smith. 1992. “Are High Quality Personnel Cost-Effective?” Social Science Quarterly 73:266–275.
Eitelberg, Mark J. 1991. “A Preliminary Assessment of Population Representation in Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm.” Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society, Baltimore, Maryland.
Fernandez, J.C. 1992. “Soldier Quality and Job Performance in Team Tasks,” Social Science Quarterly 73:253–265.
Johnston, Jerome, and Jerald G. Bachman. 1972. Young Men and Military Service. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Klerman, Jacob A., and Lynn A. Karoly. 1994. “Trends and Future Directions in Youth Labor Markets.” In Marching Toward the 21st Century, edited by Mark J. Eitelberg and Stephen L. Mehay, 41–65. Westport CT: Greenwood Press.
Orivis, Bruce R., Narayan Sastry, and Laurie L. McDonald. 1996. Military Recruiting Outlook: Recent Trends in Enlistment Propensity and Conversion of Potential Enlisted Supply. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Rice, Tom W., and Diane L. Coates. 1995. “Gender Role Attitudes in the Southern United States.” Gender & Society 9: 744–756.
Scribner, B.L., D.A. Smith, R.H. Baldwin, and R. L. Phillips. 1986. “Are Smart Tankers Better?” Armed Forces & Society 12: 193–206.
Segal, David R. 1989. Recruiting for Uncle Sam: Citizenship and Military Manpower Policy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Segal, David R., Jerald G. Bachman, Peter Freedman-Doan, and Patrick M. O'Malley. 1999. “Propensity to Serve in the U.S. Military: Temporal Trends and Subgroup Differences.” Armed Forces and Society. In press.
Segal, David R., Thomas J. Burns, William W. Falk, Michael P. Silver, and Bam Dev Sharda. 1998. “The All-Volunteer Force in the 1970s.” Social Science Quarterly. 79: 390–411.
Segal, David R., and Mady W. Segal. 1991. “Demographics of the Total Force: Quantity, Quality, and Training.” In The United States Army: Challenges and Missions in the 1990s, edited by Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. and Richard H. Shultz, Jr., 207–233. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
Segal, Mady Wechsler. 1990. “Personnel.” In American Defense Annual, 1990–1991, edited by Joseph Kruzel, 153–169. Lexington, MA: Mershon Center, The Ohio State University and Lexington Books.
Segal, Mady Wechsler. 1995, “Women's Military Roles Cross-Nationally: Past, Present, and Future.” Gender & Society, 9, 6 (December): 757–775.
Teachman, Jay D., Vaughn R.A. Call, and Mady W. Segal 1993a. “The Selectivity of Military Enlistment,” Journal of Political and Military Sociology 21: 287–309.
Teachman, Jay D., Vaughn R.A. Call, and Mady W. Segal. 1993b. “Family, Work and School Influences on the Decision to Enter the Military.” Journal of Family Issues 14:291–313.
WREI (Women's Research and Education Institute). 1998, Women in the Military: Where They Stand, 2d ed. Washington, D.C.: WREI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Mady Wechsler Segal is Professor of Sociology and Distinguished Scholar-Teacher at the University of Maryland, as well as a faculty affiliate of the Women's Studies Program and Associate Director of the Center for Research on Military Organization. Her recent research focuses on military personnel issues, with particular attention to military women and military families.
His current research focuses on enlistment propensity, diversity in military forces, and peacekeeping operations.
His most recent book is Smoking, Drinking, and Drug Use in Young Adulthood: The Impacts
He has co-authored, with David R. Segal and Jeral G. Bachman, several forthcoming articles on military propensity and enlistment.
His publications deal with alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use and related attitudes and beliefs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Segal, M.W., Segal, D.R., Bachman, J.G. et al. Gender and the propensity to enlist in the U.S. military. Gend. Issues 16, 65–87 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-998-0022-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-998-0022-0