Skip to main content

Have you really come a long way? women’s access to power in the United States

Abstract

Although vast social and political changes over the past decades have opened many opportunities for women, many activists and academics maintain that women continue to face significant barriers to entry into positions of power and influence. The vast majority of American leaders are white and male, but the representation of women in the professions has begun to rise as more and more women enter the leadership ranks of various professions. This article provides a profile of women who currently hold positions of power in the United States—who they are, what sectors they represent, and how their opinions on social and political issues compare and contrast with one another. Analyzing data from the Study of Leadership Characteristics, a recently completed national survey of American elites, this article examines the structure and gender composition of elites in the United States, revealing patterns of both conflict and consensus among women elites.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Select Bibliography

  • Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Susan J. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. 1995a. Good for Business: Making Full Use of the Nation's Human Capital. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995b. A Solid Investment: Making Full Use of the Nation's Human Capital. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlen, Frieda L. 1977. “Women Members of Congress: A Distinctive Role”. In A Portrait of Marginality, ed. Marianne Githens and Jewel L. Prestage. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurin, Patricia. 1985. “Women's Gender Consciousness”. Public Opinion Quarterly 49: 143–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, Barbara. 1984. Leadership: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Rita Mae, Michelle A. Saint-Germain, and Jody D. Horn. “Female Public Officials: A Different Voice?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 515∶77–87.

  • Leader, Shelah G. 1977. “The Policy Impact of Women Elected Officials”. In The Impact of the Electoral Process, ed. Louis Maisel and Joseph Cooper. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Robert, Althea K. Nagai, and Stanley Rothman. 1996. American Elites. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Carol. 1991. “The Gender Gap and Women's Political Influence”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 515: 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. “The Organizational Basis of Conflict in Contemporary Feminism”. In Feminist Organizations, ed. Myra Marx Ferree and Patricia Yancey Martin. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Anne. 1991. Engendering Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, Beth. 1992. “Concepts of Representation among Female and Male State Legislators”, Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 509–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinehart, Sue Tolleson. 1992. Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Mary Beth. 1993. “Women in Electoral Politics: A Slow, Steady Climb”, Social Policy 23: 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, Steven J., Warren E. Miller, Donald R. Kinder, and the National Election Studies. 1995. American National Election Study. 1994: Post-Election Survey (computer file). Conducted by University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies. 2nd ICPSR ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies, and Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (producers). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Barbara. 1992. Feminism and the Women's Movement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Germain, Michelle A. 1989. “Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona Legislature”. Social Science Quarterly 709: 956–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women”. American Political Science Review 75: 701–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. “Feminism: A Generation Later”, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 515: 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soule, John W. and Wilma E. McGrath. 1977. “A Comparative Study of Male-Female Political Attitudes at Citizen and Elite Levels”. In A Portrait of Marginality, ed. Marianne Githens and Jewel L. Prestage. New York: David McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. 1995. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 5th ed. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, Susan. 1985. “Are Women More Liberal than Men in the U.S. Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whicker, Marcia Lynn, Malcolm Jewell, and Lois Lovelace Duke. 1993. “Women in Congress”. In Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders?, ed. Lois Lovelace Duke. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Linda, Karen M. Paget, and Glenna Matthews. 1994. Running as a Woman. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Black, A.E., Rothman, S. Have you really come a long way? women’s access to power in the United States. Gend. Issues 16, 107–133 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-998-0018-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-998-0018-9

Keywords

  • Religious Leader
  • Gender Issue
  • Business Leader
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Leadership Characteristic