American Psychological Association. (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
Google Scholar
Arthur, A. E., Bigler, R. S., Liben, L. S., Gelman, S. A., & Ruble, D. N. (2008). Gender stereotyping and prejudice in young children: A developmental intergroup perspective. In S. R. Levy & M. Killen (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 66–86). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Baranowski, M. (2002). Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(3), 378–397.
Article
Google Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
Article
Google Scholar
Bem, S. L., & Bem, D. J. (1973). Does sex-biased job advertising “aid and abet” sex discrimination? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3(1), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1973.tb01290.x
Article
Google Scholar
Bigler, R. S., & Leaper, C. (2015). Gendered language: Psychological principles, evolving practices, and inclusive policies. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(1), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215600452
Article
Google Scholar
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006). A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. In R. V. Kail & R. V. Kail (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 39–89). Elsevier Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory: Explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.x
Article
Google Scholar
Bradley, E. D. (2020). The influence of linguistic and social attitudes on grammaticality judgments of singular ‘they.’ Language Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101272
Article
Google Scholar
Crawford, M., & English, L. (1984). Generic versus specific inclusion of women in language: Effects on recall. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13(5), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068152
Article
Google Scholar
Dahlen, S. (2021). Do we need the word ‘woman’ in healthcare? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 97(1150), 483–484. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140193
Article
Google Scholar
DeLoache, J. S., Cassidy, D. J., & Carpenter, C. J. (1987). The three bears are all boys: Mothers’ gender labeling of neutral picture book characters. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 17(3–4), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287623
Article
Google Scholar
Gastil, J. (1990). Generic pronouns and sexist language: The oxymoronic character of masculine generics. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 23, 629–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289252
Article
Google Scholar
Geiger, A. W., & Graf, N. (2019). About one-in-five US adults know someone who goes by a gender-neutral pronoun. Pew Research Center.
Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2017). Gender revolution [special issue]. National Geographic, 231(1), 1–70.
Google Scholar
Golden, C. R., & McHugh, M. C. (2017). The personal, political, and professional life of Sandra Bem. (2017). Sex Roles: Journal of Research, 76, 529–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0674-2
Article
Google Scholar
Green, H., & Riddington, A. (2020). Gender inclusive language in perinatal services: Mission statement and rationale. https://www.bsuh.nhs.uk/maternity/wpcontent/uploads/sites/7/2021/01/Gender-inclusive-language-in-perinatal-services.pdf
Hamilton, M. C. (1988). Using masculine generics: Does generic he increase male bias in the user's imagery? Sex roles, 19(11), 785–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288993
Article
Google Scholar
Henley, N. M. (1989). Molehill or mountain? What we know and don’t know about sex bias in language. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological perspectives. Springer.
Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (1984). Children’s understanding of sexist language. Developmental Psychology, 20(4), 697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.4.697
Article
Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581
Article
Google Scholar
Hyde, J. S., Bigler, R. S., Joel, D., Tate, C. C., & Van Anders, S. M. (2019). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist, 74(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307
Article
Google Scholar
Keener, E. (2015). The complexity of gender: It is all that and more….in sum, it is complicated. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 73, 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0542-5
Article
Google Scholar
Lambdin, J. R., Greer, K. M., Jibotian, K. S., Wood, K. R., & Hamilton, M. C. (2003). The animal = male hypothesis: Children’s and adults’ beliefs about the sex of non-sex-specific stuffed animals. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 48(11–12), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023567010708
Article
Google Scholar
Laverne, D. (2020, September 13). 4 steps to crate train your puppy + simple secret. Retrieved November 19, 2020, from https://pawleaks.com/4-steps-to-crate-train-your-dog/
Leaper, C. (2014). Gender similarities and differences in language. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 62–81). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Leaper, C., & Bigler, R. S. (2004). Gendered language and sexist thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(1), 128–142.
Article
Google Scholar
Liben, L. S., & Signorella, M. L. (1980). Gender-related schemata and constructive memory in children. Child Development, 51(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129584
Article
Google Scholar
MacKay, D. G. (1980). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist, 35(5), 444–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.5.444
Article
Google Scholar
Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 52(4), 1119–1134. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129498
Article
Google Scholar
Martyna, W. (1980). Beyond the “he/man” approach: The case for nonsexist language. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(3), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1086/493733
Article
Google Scholar
Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70(6), 487.
Article
Google Scholar
Milles, K. (2011). Feminist language planning in Sweden. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.541388
Article
Google Scholar
Modern Language Association of America. (2016). MLA handbook for writers of research papers (8th ed.). Modern Language Association of America.
Google Scholar
Modern Language Association of America. (2020). How do I use singular they? Modern Language Association of America.
Google Scholar
Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren’t. American Psychologist, 33(11), 1032–1036. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.33.11.1032
Article
Google Scholar
Moulton, K., Han, C., Block, T., Gendron, H., & Nederveen, S. (2020). Singular they in context. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 122. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1012
Article
Google Scholar
Pollitt, K. (2015, June 29). Who has abortions? The Nation. Retrieved October 8, 2021, from https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/who-has-abortions/
Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1997). A meta-analysis of children’s memories for own-sex and other-sex information. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 18(3), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(97)80009-3
Article
Google Scholar
Stahlberg, D., Braun, F., Irmen, L., & Sczesny, S. (2007). Representation of the sexes in language. In K. Fiedler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 163–187). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Stout, J. G., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). When he doesn’t mean you: Gender-exclusive language as ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211406434
Article
Google Scholar
Switzer, J. Y. (1990). The impact of generic word choices: An empirical investigation of age- and sex-related differences. Sex Roles, 22, 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288155
Article
Google Scholar
Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
Article
Google Scholar
Tate, C. C., Ledbetter, J. N., & Youssef, C. P. (2013). A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences. Journal of Sex Research, 50(8), 767–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.690110
Article
Google Scholar
Tate, C. C., Youssef, C. P., & Bettergarcia, J. N. (2014). Integrating the study of transgender spectrum and cisgender experiences of self-categorization from a personality perspective. Review of General Psychology, 18(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000019
Article
Google Scholar
The Associated Press. (2017). The associated press stylebook 2017. Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Gentile, B. (2012). Male and female pronoun use in US books reflects women’s status, 1900–2008. Sex Roles, 67, 488–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0194-7
Article
Google Scholar
Van Anders, S. M. (2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives Sex Behavior, 44, 1177–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8
Article
Google Scholar
Vergoossen, H. P., Renström, E. A., Lindqvist, A., & Sendén, M. G. (2020). Four dimensions of criticism against gender-fair language. Sex Roles, 83(5), 328–337.
Article
Google Scholar
Webster, G. (2017). The Chicago manual of style (17th ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
Article
Google Scholar