Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Emerging Adults and Gender Norms: Everyday Life Experiences, Media Perceptions, Attitudes, and Future Expectations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As media’s (e.g., television, movies, news) presence becomes increasingly prominent in individuals’ everyday lives, it is critical to consider how emerging adult men and women acquire gender norm information. Accordingly, this study explores how emerging adults’ everyday life gender norm experiences and media gender norm perceptions contribute to gender norm attitude formation and future gender norm expectations in family and career. Research has examined gender norm attitudes in relationship to everyday life, media, or future life expectations. Extending past research, this survey (n = 663) concurrently assesses the interrelationships between these constructs, employing social cognitive theory as a theoretical guide to frame hypotheses and interpret findings. Structural equation models (SEMs) illustrated emerging adults’ (M age = 20.32 years) traditional gender norm attitudes were positively correlated with traditional everyday life experiences and negatively correlated with traditional media perceptions. In each SEM, traditional gender norm attitudes positively correlated with traditional family division of labor expectations. Unexpectedly, male traditional gender norm attitudes negatively correlated with traditional career role allocation expectations. Finally, in both SEMs, only traditional everyday life experiences predicted traditional future expectations. Discussion focuses on the interplay between everyday life and media by considering the ways emerging adults may use each realm to shape gender norm attitudes and future expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amatea, E. S., Cross, E. G., Clark, J. E., & Bobby, C. L. (1986). Assessing the work and family role expectations of career-oriented men and women: The life role salience scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(4), 831–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/352576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnett, J. J. (2019). Conceptual foundations of emerging adulthood. In J. L. Murray & J. J. Arnett (Eds.), Emerging adulthood and higher education: A new student development paradigm (pp. 11–24). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Askari, S. F., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Staebell, S. E., & Axelson, S. J. (2010). Men want equality, but women don’t expect it: emerging adults’ expectations for participation in household and child care chores. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01565.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media psychology, 3(3), 265–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Banning, S. A., & Sweetser, K. D. (2007). How much do they think it affects them and whom do they believe?: Comparing the third-person effect and credibility of blogs and traditional media. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701665114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beck, D. B. (1998). The “F” word: How the media frame feminism. NWSA Journal, 10(1), 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Behm-Morawitz, E., Lewallen, J., & Miller, B. (2016). Real mean girls? Reality television viewing, social aggression, and gender-related beliefs among female emerging adults. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(4), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A thesis on the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bussey, K. (2011). Gender identity development. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 603–628). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2011). Political involvement in “mobilized” society: The interactive relationships among mobile communication, network characteristics, and political participation. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1005–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01601.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64(3–4), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coyle, E. F., Van Leer, E., Schroeder, K. M., & Fulcher, M. (2015). Planning to have it all: Emerging adults’ expectations of future work–family conflict. Sex Roles, 72(11–12), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0492-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dill, K. E., & Thill, K. P. (2007). Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Sex Roles, 57(11–12), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9278-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Erchull, M. J., Liss, M., Axelson, S. J., Staebell, S. E., & Askari, S. F. (2010). Well… she wants it more: Perceptions of social norms about desires for marriage and children and anticipated chore participation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01566.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fuller, S. (2019). Topic: U.S. Millennials: Media & marketing. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/2367/us-millennials-media-and-marketing/.

  18. Fung, A., & Ma, E. (2000). Formal vs. informal use of television and sex-role stereotyping in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 42(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007032227501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giaccardi, S., Ward, L. M., Seabrook, R. C., Manago, A., & Lippman, J. (2016). Media and modern manhood: Testing associations between media consumption and young men’s acceptance of traditional gender ideologies. Sex Roles, 75(3–4), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0588-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gidwani, P. P., Sobol, A., DeJong, W., Perrin, J. M., & Gortmaker, S. L. (2002). Television viewing and initiation of smoking among youth. Pediatrics, 110(3), 505–508. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.3.505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harrison, K., & Cantor, J. (1997). The relationship between media consumption and eating disorders. Journal of Communication, 47(1), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02692.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hjorth, L., & Pink, S. (2014). New visualities and the digital wayfarer: Reconceptualizing camera phone photography and locative media. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157913505257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaufman, G. (2005). Gender role attitudes and college students’ work and family expectations. Gender Issues, 22(2), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-005-0015-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaufman, G., & White, D. (2015). What Makes a “Good Job”? Gender Role Attitudes and Job Preferences in Sweden. Gender Issues, 32(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-015-9145-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Keener, E., Mehta, C., & Strough, J. (2013). Should educators and parents encourage other-gender interactions? Gender segregation and sexism. Gender and Education, 25(7), 818–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.845648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirsch, A. C., & Murnen, S. K. (2015). “Hot” girls and “cool dudes”: Examining the prevalence of the heterosexual script in American children’s television media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lam, C. B., Stanik, C., & McHale, S. M. (2017). The development and correlates of gender role attitudes in African American youth. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawson, K. M., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2015). Links between family gender socialization experiences in childhood and gendered occupational attainment in young adulthood. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lemaster, P., Strough, J., Stoiko, R., & DiDonato, L. (2015). To have and to do: Masculine facets of gender predict men’s and women’s attitudes about gender equality among college students. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McLeod, D. M., Wise, D., & Perryman, M. (2017). Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perceptions, and their consequences. Review of Communication Research, 5, 35–83. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2017.05.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Meeussen, L., Veldman, J., & Van Laar, C. (2016). Combining gender, work, and family identities: The cross-over and spill-over of gender norms into emerging adults’ work and family aspirations. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1781), 1781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Morinaga, Y., Frieze, I. H., & Ferligoj, A. (1993). Career plans and gender-role attitudes of college students in the United States, Japan, and Slovenia. Sex Roles, 29(5–6), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Murphy, K. R., & Aguinis, H. (2017). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ng, E. S., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nielsen (2018). Millennials on millennials TV and digital news consumption. The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. https://www.nielsen.com/wpcontent/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/millennials-on-millennials-tv-and-digital-news-consumption.pdf.

  36. Paa, H. K., & McWhirter, E. H. (2000). Perceived influences on high school students’ current career expectations. The Career Development Quarterly, 49(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2000.tb00749.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pajares, F., Prestin, A., Chen, J., & Nabi, R. L. (2009). Social cognitive theory and media effects. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 283–297). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rivadeneyra, R., & Ward, L. M. (2005). From Ally McBeal to Sábado Gigante contributions of television viewing to the gender role attitudes of latino adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(4), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558405274871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Uhls, Y. T., Zgourou, E., & Greenfield, P. M. (2014). 21st century media, fame, and other future aspirations: A national survey of 9–15 year olds. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-4-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. United States Census Bureau. (2015). Millennials Outnumber Baby Boomers and Are Far More Diverse, Census Bureau Reports. United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-113.html.

  41. Van den Bulck, J. (1999). Mediation: Toward a media theory of the social construction of reality. Communication, 25(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500169908537875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zemach, T., & Cohen, A. A. (1986). Perception of gender equality on television and in social reality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158609386635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and the Arts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study’s conceptualization, development, and data collection. H.W. was responsible for data analysis, interpretation, and writing the manuscript. K.H. provided feedback throughout the analysis, interpretation, and writing process.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Halie Wenhold.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants included in this study.

Ethical Approval

Procedures were approved by the University of Michigan Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences IRB and follow its ethical standards.

Informed Consent

All participants provided their informed consent before participating in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wenhold, H., Harrison, K. Emerging Adults and Gender Norms: Everyday Life Experiences, Media Perceptions, Attitudes, and Future Expectations. Gend. Issues 38, 420–437 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-020-09270-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-020-09270-3

Keywords

Navigation