Abstract
As media’s (e.g., television, movies, news) presence becomes increasingly prominent in individuals’ everyday lives, it is critical to consider how emerging adult men and women acquire gender norm information. Accordingly, this study explores how emerging adults’ everyday life gender norm experiences and media gender norm perceptions contribute to gender norm attitude formation and future gender norm expectations in family and career. Research has examined gender norm attitudes in relationship to everyday life, media, or future life expectations. Extending past research, this survey (n = 663) concurrently assesses the interrelationships between these constructs, employing social cognitive theory as a theoretical guide to frame hypotheses and interpret findings. Structural equation models (SEMs) illustrated emerging adults’ (M age = 20.32 years) traditional gender norm attitudes were positively correlated with traditional everyday life experiences and negatively correlated with traditional media perceptions. In each SEM, traditional gender norm attitudes positively correlated with traditional family division of labor expectations. Unexpectedly, male traditional gender norm attitudes negatively correlated with traditional career role allocation expectations. Finally, in both SEMs, only traditional everyday life experiences predicted traditional future expectations. Discussion focuses on the interplay between everyday life and media by considering the ways emerging adults may use each realm to shape gender norm attitudes and future expectations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amatea, E. S., Cross, E. G., Clark, J. E., & Bobby, C. L. (1986). Assessing the work and family role expectations of career-oriented men and women: The life role salience scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48(4), 831–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/352576.
Arnett, J. J. (2019). Conceptual foundations of emerging adulthood. In J. L. Murray & J. J. Arnett (Eds.), Emerging adulthood and higher education: A new student development paradigm (pp. 11–24). London: Routledge.
Askari, S. F., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Staebell, S. E., & Axelson, S. J. (2010). Men want equality, but women don’t expect it: emerging adults’ expectations for participation in household and child care chores. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01565.x.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media psychology, 3(3), 265–299.
Banning, S. A., & Sweetser, K. D. (2007). How much do they think it affects them and whom do they believe?: Comparing the third-person effect and credibility of blogs and traditional media. Communication Quarterly, 55(4), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370701665114.
Beck, D. B. (1998). The “F” word: How the media frame feminism. NWSA Journal, 10(1), 139–153.
Behm-Morawitz, E., Lewallen, J., & Miller, B. (2016). Real mean girls? Reality television viewing, social aggression, and gender-related beliefs among female emerging adults. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(4), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000074.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A thesis on the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.
Bussey, K. (2011). Gender identity development. In S. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 603–628). New York, NY: Springer.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676–713.
Campbell, S. W., & Kwak, N. (2011). Political involvement in “mobilized” society: The interactive relationships among mobile communication, network characteristics, and political participation. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1005–1024. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01601.x.
Collins, R. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go? Sex Roles, 64(3–4), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.
Coyle, E. F., Van Leer, E., Schroeder, K. M., & Fulcher, M. (2015). Planning to have it all: Emerging adults’ expectations of future work–family conflict. Sex Roles, 72(11–12), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0492-y.
Dill, K. E., & Thill, K. P. (2007). Video game characters and the socialization of gender roles: Young people’s perceptions mirror sexist media depictions. Sex Roles, 57(11–12), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9278-1.
Erchull, M. J., Liss, M., Axelson, S. J., Staebell, S. E., & Askari, S. F. (2010). Well… she wants it more: Perceptions of social norms about desires for marriage and children and anticipated chore participation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(2), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01566.x.
Fuller, S. (2019). Topic: U.S. Millennials: Media & marketing. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/2367/us-millennials-media-and-marketing/.
Fung, A., & Ma, E. (2000). Formal vs. informal use of television and sex-role stereotyping in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, 42(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007032227501.
Giaccardi, S., Ward, L. M., Seabrook, R. C., Manago, A., & Lippman, J. (2016). Media and modern manhood: Testing associations between media consumption and young men’s acceptance of traditional gender ideologies. Sex Roles, 75(3–4), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0588-z.
Gidwani, P. P., Sobol, A., DeJong, W., Perrin, J. M., & Gortmaker, S. L. (2002). Television viewing and initiation of smoking among youth. Pediatrics, 110(3), 505–508. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.3.505.
Harrison, K., & Cantor, J. (1997). The relationship between media consumption and eating disorders. Journal of Communication, 47(1), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02692.x.
Hjorth, L., & Pink, S. (2014). New visualities and the digital wayfarer: Reconceptualizing camera phone photography and locative media. Mobile Media & Communication, 2(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157913505257.
Kaufman, G. (2005). Gender role attitudes and college students’ work and family expectations. Gender Issues, 22(2), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-005-0015-1.
Kaufman, G., & White, D. (2015). What Makes a “Good Job”? Gender Role Attitudes and Job Preferences in Sweden. Gender Issues, 32(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-015-9145-2.
Keener, E., Mehta, C., & Strough, J. (2013). Should educators and parents encourage other-gender interactions? Gender segregation and sexism. Gender and Education, 25(7), 818–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2013.845648.
Kirsch, A. C., & Murnen, S. K. (2015). “Hot” girls and “cool dudes”: Examining the prevalence of the heterosexual script in American children’s television media. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000017.
Lam, C. B., Stanik, C., & McHale, S. M. (2017). The development and correlates of gender role attitudes in African American youth. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 406–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12828.
Lawson, K. M., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2015). Links between family gender socialization experiences in childhood and gendered occupational attainment in young adulthood. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.003.
Lemaster, P., Strough, J., Stoiko, R., & DiDonato, L. (2015). To have and to do: Masculine facets of gender predict men’s and women’s attitudes about gender equality among college students. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 16(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036429.
McLeod, D. M., Wise, D., & Perryman, M. (2017). Thinking about the media: A review of theory and research on media perceptions, media effects perceptions, and their consequences. Review of Communication Research, 5, 35–83. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2017.05.01.013.
Meeussen, L., Veldman, J., & Van Laar, C. (2016). Combining gender, work, and family identities: The cross-over and spill-over of gender norms into emerging adults’ work and family aspirations. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1781), 1781. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01781.
Morinaga, Y., Frieze, I. H., & Ferligoj, A. (1993). Career plans and gender-role attitudes of college students in the United States, Japan, and Slovenia. Sex Roles, 29(5–6), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289426.
Murphy, K. R., & Aguinis, H. (2017). HARKing: How badly can cherry-picking and question trolling produce bias in published results? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9524-7.
Ng, E. S., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4.
Nielsen (2018). Millennials on millennials TV and digital news consumption. The Nielsen Company (US), LLC. https://www.nielsen.com/wpcontent/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/millennials-on-millennials-tv-and-digital-news-consumption.pdf.
Paa, H. K., & McWhirter, E. H. (2000). Perceived influences on high school students’ current career expectations. The Career Development Quarterly, 49(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2000.tb00749.x.
Pajares, F., Prestin, A., Chen, J., & Nabi, R. L. (2009). Social cognitive theory and media effects. In R. L. Nabi & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 283–297). London: SAGE Publications.
Rivadeneyra, R., & Ward, L. M. (2005). From Ally McBeal to Sábado Gigante contributions of television viewing to the gender role attitudes of latino adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(4), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558405274871.
Uhls, Y. T., Zgourou, E., & Greenfield, P. M. (2014). 21st century media, fame, and other future aspirations: A national survey of 9–15 year olds. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2014-4-5.
United States Census Bureau. (2015). Millennials Outnumber Baby Boomers and Are Far More Diverse, Census Bureau Reports. United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-113.html.
Van den Bulck, J. (1999). Mediation: Toward a media theory of the social construction of reality. Communication, 25(1–2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02500169908537875.
Yavorsky, J. E., Kamp Dush, C. M., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The production of inequality: The gender division of labor across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(3), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12189.
Zemach, T., & Cohen, A. A. (1986). Perception of gender equality on television and in social reality. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 30(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838158609386635.
Funding
This study was funded by the University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and the Arts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study’s conceptualization, development, and data collection. H.W. was responsible for data analysis, interpretation, and writing the manuscript. K.H. provided feedback throughout the analysis, interpretation, and writing process.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants included in this study.
Ethical Approval
Procedures were approved by the University of Michigan Health Sciences and Behavioral Sciences IRB and follow its ethical standards.
Informed Consent
All participants provided their informed consent before participating in this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wenhold, H., Harrison, K. Emerging Adults and Gender Norms: Everyday Life Experiences, Media Perceptions, Attitudes, and Future Expectations. Gend. Issues 38, 420–437 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-020-09270-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-020-09270-3