Through Article 750 of the Japanese Civil Code, Japan is the only developed country to require that a married couple must choose either the husband’s or the wife’s surname upon marriage. We examine how traditional gender ideology and preference for the three-generation family household are associated with the level of support for conjugal surname sharing, from full support for the wife taking her husband’s surname to support for neither the wife or husband changing their name. We estimate generalized ordered logit models with data from the 2000–2003, 2006, and 2010 Japanese General Social Survey. Findings indicate that those who hold more traditional gender ideology are more likely to endorse surname sharing at all levels. Those who prefer the traditional extended family household are more likely to acknowledge at least some merit in a married couple sharing a surname, but they are less likely to say that the wife should take her husband’s surname without question. Attitudes toward conjugal surname sharing may have important symbolic implications for gender equality as well as potential impact on the surname law.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
In an additional analysis (results not tabled), we examined the effect of familism using the 2006 JGSS that included an item on families and found that familism positively affects support for the practice at each threshold (p < .05). Nevertheless, the effect of familism is small (log odds = .09). Familism moderately correlated with gender traditionalism and its effect was more limited, controlling for the latter. An analysis by gender showed that at each threshold of support, the effect of familism is only significant for women (men: log odds = .06, p = .31; women: log odds = .15, p < .01), although this gender difference is not significant.
Boxer, D., & Gritsenko, E. (2005). Women and surnames across cultures: Reconstituting identity in marriage. Women and Language,28(2), 1–11.
Bryant, T. L. (1990). Sons and lovers: Adoption in Japan. American Journal of Comparative Law,38(2), 299–336.
Calamur, K. (2015). The 19th-century Japanese law on last names. The Atlantic. Retrieved December 16, 2015 from https://www.theatlantic.com.
Castrén, A. (2019). Becoming ‘us’: Marital name, gender, and agentic work in transition to marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family Issues,81(1), 248–263.
Davies, H. (2011). Sharing surnames: Children, family and kinship. Sociology,45(4), 554–569.
Davis, A. N., Street, C., & Carlo, G. (2016). Familism. In C. L. Shehan (Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of family studies (Vol. 1, pp. 701–704). West Sussex: Wiley.
Dion, K. L. (1983). Names, identity, and self. Names: A Journal of Onomastics,31(4), 245–257.
Emrich, C. G., Denmark, F. L., & den Hartog, D. N. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. In R. J. House, P. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership and organisations: The globe study of 62 societies (pp. 343–394). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Finch, J. (2008). Naming names: Kinship, individuality and personal names. Sociology,42(4), 709–725.
Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., White, K. B., & Hamm, N. R. (2002). Perceptions of married women and married men with hyphenated surnames. Sex Roles,46(5–6), 167–175.
Hamilton, L., Geist, C., & Powell, B. (2011). Marital name change as a window into gender attitudes. Gender & Society,25(2), 145–175.
Hashimoto, A., & Traphagan, J. W. (2008). Changing Japanese families. In A. Hashimoto & J. W. Traphagan (Eds.), Imagined families, lived families: Culture and kinship in contemporary Japan (pp. 1–12). Albany: SUNY Press.
Hongo, J. (2015). Japan’s top court rules married couples must have same surname. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 16, 2015 from https://www.wsj.com.
ICPSR. (2016). Survey of midlife development in Japan (MIDJA 2), 2012 No. 36427. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
Ishida, K. (2018). Why does surname matter? Past, present, and future prospect of family law from a gender perspective in Japan. Journal of Korean Law,18, 59–81.
Kato, A. (2013). The Japanese family system: Change, continuity, and regionality over the twentieth century. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research WP 2013-004. Rostock, Germany.
Kerns, M. Y. (2011). North American women’s surname choice based on ethnicity and self-identification as feminists. Names: A Journal of Onomastics,59(2), 104–117.
Komatsu, R. (2018). Support for married couples’ dual-surname system edges up. Asahi Shinbun. Retrieved June 13, 2018 from http://www.asahi.com.
Krogness, K. J. (2014). Jus koseki: Household registration and Japanese citizenship. The Asia-Pacific Journal|Japan Focus 12(35). https://apjjf.org. Retrieved 15 January 2018.
Lee, K. S. (2010). Gender, care work, and the complexity of family membership in Japan. Gender & Society,24(5), 647–671.
Lockwood, P., Burton, C., & Boersma, K. (2011). Tampering with tradition: Rationales concerning women’s married names and children’s surnames. Sex Roles,65(11–12), 827–839.
Matsui, S. (2011). Why is the Japanese Supreme Court so conservative? Washington University Law Review,88(6), 1375–1423.
McGee, O. (2015). Why married couples in Japan must have same surname. Japan Today. Retrieved October 1, 2015 from https://japantoday.com.
Miyamoto, Y., Ninomiya, S., & Shin, K-Y. (2011). The Family, koseki, and the individual: Japanese and Korean Experiences. The Asia-Pacific Journal| Japan Focus 9(36). https://apjjf.org. Retrieved 7 June 2018.
Noack, T., & Wiik, K. A. (2008). Women’s choice of surname upon marriage in Norway. Journal of Marriage and Family,70(2), 507–518.
Nugent, C. (2010). Children’s surnames, moral dilemmas: Accounting for the predominance of fathers’ surnames for children. Gender & Society,24(4), 499–525.
Omura, M. (2019). Why can’t I keep my surname? The fairness and welfare of the Japanese legal system. Feminist Economics,25(3), 171–200.
Park, K.-S., Kim, I. K., & Kojima, H. (1999). Intergenerational coresidence and nearness in Korea and Japan: Unbalanced aspects of family changes. International Journal of Japanese Sociology,8(1), 93–115.
Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Pilcher, J. (2016). Names, bodies and identities. Sociology,50(4), 764–779.
Pilcher, J. (2017). Names and “doing gender”: How forenames and surnames contribute to gender identities, difference, and inequalities. Sex Roles,77(11–12), 812–822.
Robnett, R. D., Underwood, C. R., Nelson, P. A., & Anderson, K. J. (2016). ‘She might be afraid of commitment’: Perceptions of women who retain their surname after marriage. Sex Roles,75(9–10), 500–513.
Shafer, E. F. (2017). Hillary Rodham versus Hillary Clinton: Consequences of surname choice in marriage. Gender Issues,34(4), 316–332.
Shimoju, A. (2016). The illness called family II (Kazoku to iuyamai 2). Tokyo: Gentosha.
Shin, K-y. (2008). ‘The personal is the political’: Women’s surname change in Japan. Journal of Korean Law,8, 161–179.
Shin, K-y. (2009). Fufubessei movement in Japan: Thinking women resistance and subjectivity. In C. Bose & M. Kim (Eds.), Global gender research: Transnational perspectives (pp. 141–148). New York: Rougledge.
Stoiko, R. R., & Strough, J. (2017). Choosing the patriarchal norm: Emerging adults marital last name change attitudes, plans, and rationales. Gender Issues,34(4), 295–315.
Sugimoto, Y. (2010). An introduction to Japanese society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Suter, E. A. (2004). Tradition never goes out of style: The role of tradition in women’s naming practices. The Communication Review,7(1), 57–87.
Takagi, E., & Silverstein, M. (2006). Intergenerational coresidence of the Japanese elderly: Are cultural norms proactive or reactive? Research on Ageing,28(4), 473–492.
Tanaka, K. (2012). Surnames and gender in Japan: Women’s challenges in seeking own identity. Journal of Family History,37(2), 232–240.
Theodorson, G. A., & Theodorson, A. G. (1969). A modern dictionary of sociology. New York: Crowell.
Thwaites, R. (2013). The making of selfhood: Naming decisions on marriage. Families, Relationships and Societies,2(3), 425–439.
Toller, P. W., Suter, E. A., & Trautman, T. C. (2004). Gender role identity and attitudes toward feminism. Sex Roles,51(1–2), 85–90.
Toyoda, E., & Chapman, D. (2017). Resistance and reform: Discourses on marital law in Japan. Japan Forum,29(4), 470–495.
Traphagan, J. W. (2000). The liminal family: Return migration and intergenerational conflict in Japan. Journal of Anthropological Research,56(3), 365–385.
Traphagan, J. W. (2004). Curse of the successor: Filial piety vs. marriage among rural Japanese. In C. Ikels (Ed.), Filial piety: Practice and discourse in contemporary East Asia (pp. 198–216). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Ueno, C. (2009). The modern family in Japan: Its rise and fall. Victoria: TransPacific Press.
United Nations, CEDAW. (2002). Fifth periodic report on implementation of convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (Japan). http://www.un.org. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
United Nations, Human Rights Council. (2017). National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21, Japan, 2017, A/HRC/WG.6/28/JPN/1; Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, 28th session. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/JPIndex.aspx. Retrieved 18 June 2018.
White, L. E. (2018). Gender and the koseki in contemporary Japan: Surname, power, and privilege. New York: Routledge.
Williams, R. (2006). Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional-odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata Journal,6(1), 58–82.
World Economic Forum. (2017). The global gender gap report. https://www.weforum.org. Retrieved 6 January 2019.
Yasuda, T., Iwai, N., Yi, C-c, & Xie, G. (2011). Intergenerational coresidence in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan: Comparative analyses based on the East Asian Social Survey 2006. Journal of Comparative Family Studies,42(5), 703–722.
Conflict of interest
Hiromi Taniguchi and Gayle Kaufman declares no conflict of interest.
This study is based on an analysis of national survey datasets accessed through the ICPSR, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (https://www.icpsr.umich.edu). These datasets are de-identified, and consent of survey respondents can be reasonably presumed.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
See Table 3.
About this article
Cite this article
Taniguchi, H., Kaufman, G. Attitudes Toward Married Persons’ Surnames in Twenty-First Century Japan. Gend. Issues 37, 205–222 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-019-09245-z
- Gender ideology
- Traditional family form