In this paper I expand on the current literature regarding how women are perceived by surname choice with a vignette experiment conducted in a diverse sample (N = 1243) of the U.S. and ordered logistic regression to evaluate (1) how committed respondents think a woman is as a wife by her last name choice and (2) whether a woman’s last name choice causes individuals to hold her to different standards (a backlash effect). I describe the woman’s behavior in marriage in order to see if surname choice matters beyond information on how the woman is “performing.” In addition, I examine whether name change varies depending on the educational attainment and gender of the evaluator. While overall, last name choice appears to have little impact on how women are viewed among women and highly educated men, I find that men of low education view women who retain their surnames in marriage as less committed wives. These men also think women who retain their surnames should be held to higher standards than women with their husbands’ last names. My results follow scholarship that finds that men of lower education are more protective of overt instances of the gender hierarchy, of which surname practices are an important example.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Perception of a woman given her last name choice is different than attitudes toward last name choice in general. We do have information on how men and women without college degrees feel about surname choice in general (Hamilton 2011).
My experiment focuses on heterosexual marriage. It was fielded in 2010 before same-sex marriage was legal nationwide.
Clinton, H. R. (2004). Living History. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Gooding, G. E., & Kreider, R. M. (2010). Women’s marital naming choices in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Family Issues, 31(5), 681–701.
Hamilton, L., Geist, C., & Powell, B. (2011). Marital name change as a window into gender attitudes. Gender & Society, 25(2), 145–175.
Etaugh, C. E., Bridges, J. S., Cummings-Hill, M., & Cohen, J. (1999). Names can never hurt me? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(4), 819–823.
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629.
Pyke, K. D. (1996). Class-based masculinities the interdependence of gender, class, and interpersonal power. Gender & Society, 10(5), 527–549.
Foss, K. A., & Edson, B. A. (1989). What’s in a name? Accounts of married women’s name choices. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(4), 356–373.
England, P. (2010). The gender revolution uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24(2), 149–166.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system a theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531.
Correll, S. J., Thebaud, S., & Benard, S. (2007). An introduction to the social psychology of gender. Advances in Group Processes, 24, 1–18.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Benard, S., & Correll, S. J. (2010). Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society, 24(5), 616–646.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 657–674.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in organizational Behavior, 32, 113–135.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 1004.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 743–762.
Ferree, M. M., Lorber, J., & Hess, B. B. (1999). Revisioning gender. Lanham, MD: Rowman Altamira.
Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. California: Univ of California Press.
Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments1. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730.
Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21–42.
Ridgeway, C. L. (1997). Interaction and the conservation of gender inequality: Considering employment. American Sociological Review, 62, 218–235.
Hamilton, L. (2010). Family names count: Marital name change and definitions of family. In B. Powell, C. Bolzendahl, C. Geist, & L. C. Steelman (Eds.), Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans’ definitions of family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.
Bittman, M., England, P., Sayer, L., Folbre, N., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does gender trump money? Bargaining and time in household work. American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186–214.
England, P. (2011). Missing the big picture and making much ado about almost nothing: Recent scholarship on gender and household work. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 3(1), 23–26.
Gupta, S. (2007). Autonomy, dependence, or display? The relationship between married women’s earnings and housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(2), 399–417.
Munsch, C. L. (2015). Her support, his support: Money, masculinity, and marital infidelity. American Sociological Review, 80(3), 469–495.
Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., White, K. B., & Hamm, N. R. (2002). Perceptions of married women and married men with hyphenated surnames. Sex Roles, 46(5–6), 167–175.
Murray, T. E. (2013). Attitudes toward married women’s surnames: Evidence from the American Midwest. Names, 45(3), 163–183.
Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 87–105.
Pyke, K. D. (1994). Women’s employment as a gift or burden? Marital power across marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Gender & Society, 8(1), 73–91.
Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2001). Overworked individuals or overworked families? Explaining trends in work, leisure, and family time. Work and occupations, 28(1), 40–63.
Sniderman, P. M., & Grob, D. B. (1996). Innovations in experimental design in attitude surveys. Annual review of Sociology, 22, 377–399.
Liao, F. (2004). Comparing social groups. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 45(1–2), 3–16.
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual review of sociology, 29, 417–442.
Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 23(2), 230–257.
Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 821–831.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
Kane, E. W. (2000). Racial and ethnic variations in gender-related attitudes. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 419–439.
Scheuble, L., & Johnson, D. R. (1993). Marital name change: Plans and attitudes of college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 747–754.
Scheuble, L. K., Johnson, D. R., & Johnson, K. M. (2012). Marital name changing attitudes and plans of college students: Comparing change over time and across regions. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 282–292.
Goldin, C., & Shim, M. (2004). Making a name: Women’s surnames at marriage and beyond. Journal of Economic Perspective, 18(2), 143–160.
Brightman, J. (1994). Why Hillary chooses Rodham Clinton. American Demographics, 16(3), 9–10.
I thank Paula England, Shelley J. Correll, Corey D. Fields, and Elizabeth Aura McClintock for the comments on this manuscript. The data for this project were collected by TESS, Time-sharing Experiments in the Social Sciences, NSF Grant 0818839, Jeremy Freese and James Drunkman, Principal Investigators.
“All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”
About this article
Cite this article
Shafer, E.F. Hillary Rodham Versus Hillary Clinton: Consequences of Surname Choice in Marriage. Gend. Issues 34, 316–332 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9182-5
- Married names
- Last name choice