Advertisement

Gender Issues

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 223–239 | Cite as

The Good, the Bad, and the Male: Men, But Not Women, Avoid Own-Gender Stereotypical Judgments of Affective Valence

  • Markus ConradEmail author
  • Christian von Scheve
Original Article

Abstract

We examine gender differences in the endorsement of gender-stereotypical judgments of the affective valence of social concepts. Sociological as well as social psychological theories indicate that individuals are inclined to behave in ways concordant with prevailing roles and corresponding stereotypes. Recent debates suggest gender biases in the social desirability of gender-stereotype endorsement. We use words with apparent gender differences in perceived affective valence and ask participants to (a) individually rate the valence of each word, (b) estimate how, in general, same-sex individuals would rate the word, and (c) estimate how, in general, opposite-sex individuals would rate the word. Results show that female participants’ self-ratings align with their estimated ratings of the majority of women, whereas male participants’ self-ratings notably deviate from their estimated male majority ratings. We interpret these results as a consequence of a declining esteem of stereotypically male attributes in society.

Keywords

Emotion Valence Gender Stereotype Social roles 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by two Grants (201; 410) of the Cluster “Languages of Emotion” at Freie Universität Berlin to M.C. and C.v.S; M.C. was also supported by Grant JCI-2011-10828 from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and a Grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, #JA823/3-2).

References

  1. 1.
    Brannon, L. (2010). Gender: Psychological perspectives (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bridges, T., & Pascoe, C. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Social Compass, 8(3), 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carver, P. R., Yunger, J. L., & Perry, D. G. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 49, 95–109. doi: 10.1023/A:1024423012063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Connell, R.W. (2001). Men and the boys. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conrad, M., Recio, G., & Jacobs, A. M. (2011). The time course of emotion effects in first and second language processing: A cross cultural ERP study with German-Spanish bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. doi: 10.1177/0146168200262001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eisenchlas, S. A. (2013). Gender roles and expectations: Any changes online? Sage Open, 2013, 1–11. doi: 10.1177/2158244013506446.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fischer, A. H. (1993). Sex differences in emotionality: Fact or stereotype? Feminism and Psychology, 3, 303–318. doi: 10.1177/0959353593033002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R. J., & Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 221–242. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heller, E. (1987). Beim nächsten Mann wird alles anders. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hogg, M. A. (1985). Masculine and feminine speech in dyads and groups: A study of speech style and gender salience. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hogg, M. A., Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jelinek, E. (1989). 1989. In Claudia Gehrke (Ed.), Frauen & Pornographie (p. 102). Tübingen: Konkursbuch Verlag Claudia Gehrke.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., Grubich, C., Võ, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., & Herrmann, M. (2005). Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 28(4), 1022–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenton, A. P., Sedikides, C., & Bruder, M. (2009). A latent semantic analysis of gender stereotype-consistency and narrowness in American English. Sex Roles, 60, 269–278. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9534-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lind, H. (1994). Das superweib. Frankfurt am Main: Naumann und Göbel.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindsey, L. L. (2010). Gender roles: A sociological perspective. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Massey, D. S. (2007). Categorically unequal: The American stratification system. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGuire, W. (1984). Search for the self: Going beyond self-esteem and the reactive self. In R. A. Zucker, J. Aronoff, & A. I. Rabin (Eds.), Personality and the prediction of behavior (pp. 73–120). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McGuire, W., & McGuire, C. V. (1981). The spontaneous self-concept as affected by personal distinctiveness. In M. D. Lynch, A. Norem-Hebeisen, & K. Gergen (Eds.), Self-concept: Advances in theory and research (pp. 147–171). Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    País, E. (2011). Lento adiós al piropo. http://www.elpais.com/articulo/sociedad/Lento/adios/piropo/elpepisoc/20110321elpepisoc_1/Tes Retrieved 30 April 2011.
  24. 24.
    Piliavin, J. A., & Martin, R. R. (1978). The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction. Sex Roles, 4, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Recio, G., Conrad, M., Hansen, L. B., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). On pleasure and thrill: The interplay between arousal and valence during visual word recognition. Brain and Language, 134, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reeser, T. W. (2010). Masculinities in theory: An introduction. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444317312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stewart, A. J., & McDermott, C. (2004). Gender in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 519–544. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Swan, S., & Wyer, R. S. (1997). Gender Stereotypes and Social Identity. How being in the minority affects judgments of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1265–1276. doi: 10.1177/01461682972312004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Thelwall, M., & Kappas, A. (2014). The role of sentiment in the social web. In C. von Scheve & M. Salmela (Eds.), Collective emotions (pp. 375–388). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Võ, M.-L., Jacobs, A. M., & Conrad, M. (2006). Crossvalidating the Berlin affective word list (BAWL). Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 606–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Võ, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., Kuchinke, K., Urton, K., Hofmann, M. J., & Jacobs, A. M. (2009). The Berlin affective word list reloaded. Behaviour Research Methods, 41(2), 534–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wharton, A. S. (2005). The sociology of gender: an introduction to theory and research. alden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2009). Gender identity. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 109–125). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive PsychologyUniversity of La LagunaTenerifeSpain
  2. 2.Department of SociologyFreie Universität Berlin and German Institute for Economic Research (DIW)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations