Hiring Decisions: The Effect of Evaluator Gender and Gender Stereotype Characteristics on the Evaluation of Job Applicants
This study examined how the gender and gender stereotype characteristics of an evaluator influenced a hypothetical hiring decision, and the effects of automatically activating gender stereotypes prior to a hiring decision. One hundred and twenty-nine undergraduates (80 female) completed a priming manipulation that activated gender stereotype-congruent or stereotype-incongruent associations, followed by an evaluation of a male or female job applicant. Results indicated that the gender and masculinity of an evaluator were related to the evaluations. After stereotype-congruent priming, men rated male applicants higher than female applicants and men’s masculinity was associated with less favorable ratings. After stereotype-incongruent priming, male participants extended a more positive evaluation toward female applicants than when stereotype-congruent gender ideas were primed. Female participants were less affected by the priming and showed more egalitarian evaluations. Findings underscore the importance of having gender-balanced search committees and interventions that address implicit gender biases in hiring decisions.
KeywordsGender stereotypes Gender roles Hiring decisions Priming
- 1.Abcarin, R. (2014). Is fired N.Y. Times editor Jill Abramson the new Lilly Ledbetter? The Los Angeles times. http://www.latimes.com/local/abcarian/la-me-ra-new-york-times-fired-jill-abramson-20140515-column.html.
- 4.Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Retrieved January 14, 2013 from http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/reports/documents/womeninstemagaptoinnovation8311.pdf.
- 5.Bilimoria, D., & Burch, K. K. (2010). The Search is on: Engendering faculty diversity through more effective search and recruitment. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. Retrieved July 8, 2014 from http://changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/July-August%202010/index.html.
- 16.Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Of men women and motivation: A role congruity account. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 434–447). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- 18.Eagly, A. H., & Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men and leaders: Have times changed? In M. Baretto, M. Ryan, & M. Scmidtt (Eds.), Barriers to diversity: The glass ceiling after 20 years (pp. 21–47). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar
- 21.Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Sexism and other “isms”: Interdependence, status, and the ambivalent content of stereotypes. In W. B. Swann, J. H. Langiois, & L. A. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of James Taylor Spence (pp. 193–211). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Jacobs, J. A. (1993). Men in female-dominated fields. Doing ‘women’s work’: Men in nontraditional occupations.Google Scholar
- 26.Milkman, K. L., Akinola, M., & Chugh, D. (2014). What happens before? A field experiment exploring how pay and representation differentially shape bias on the pathway into organizations. Social science research network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2063742.
- 27.Miller, C. C. (2014). Google releases employee data, illustrating tech’s diversity challenge. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/05/28/google-releases-employee-data-illustrating-techs-diversity-challenge/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0.
- 28.National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine: Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering; Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- 29.National Research Council: Committee on Gender Differences in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty; Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine. (2010). Gender differences at critical transitions in the careers of science, engineering, and mathematics faculty. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- 31.Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur Schmelkin, L. (1991). Exploratory factor analysis. Measurement, Design and Analysis: An integrated approach, pp. 590–630.Google Scholar
- 37.Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2, 993–1007.Google Scholar
- 39.Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA. Thomson/Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
- 40.Valian, V. (2004). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 16, 207–220.Google Scholar
- 41.Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute (retrieved 7/8/14). Breaking the Bias Habit: Retaining and advancing excellent faculty through bias literacy. Retrieved On July 8, 2014 from http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/bias.php.