The Role of Romantic Attachment in Women’s Experiences of Body Surveillance and Body Shame

Gender Issues volume 32, pages111–120(2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Self-objectification, body surveillance, and body shame have been widely researched in the context of early attachment and interpersonal relationships; however, no research to date had been conducted on the role of romantic attachment styles. In the current study, we examined the role of romantic attachment in women’s (n = 193) experiences of body surveillance and body shame. We hypothesized a model in which anxious and avoidant attachment positively predicted body shame through the intervening variable of body surveillance and then revised the model to incorporate a direct path from anxious attachment to body shame. The revised model had good fit to our data. Our research suggests that body surveillance and body shame are outcomes of insecure romantic attachment in adulthood. While this was true for both insecure attachment styles, anxious attachment, in particular, was a stronger predictor of both body surveillance and body shame. We discuss the potential implications of these findings in the context of prior research on self-objectification and relationship contingency, self-esteem, and rejection fears.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    APA, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls/report.aspx.

  2. 2.

    Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measures of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Buchanan, T. S., Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., & Yoder, J. D. (2008). Testing a culture-specific extension of objectification theory regarding African American women’s body image. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 697–718. doi:10.1177/0011000008316322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Carr, E. R., & Szymanski, D. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance abuse in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39–66. doi:10.1177/0011000010378449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cash, T. F., Thériault, J., & Annis, N. M. (2004). Body image in an interpersonal context: Adult attachment, fear of intimacy, and social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 89–103. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.1.89.26987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chen, F. F., & Russo, N. F. (2010). Measurement invariance and the role of body consciousness in depressive symptoms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 405–417. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01585.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Elgin, J., & Pritchard, M. (2006). Adult attachment and disordered eating in undergraduate men and women. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 21, 25–40. doi:10.1300/J035v21n02_05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Engeln-Maddox, R., Miller, S. A., & Doyle, D. M. (2011). Tests of objectification theory in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual community samples: Mixed evidence for proposed pathways. Sex Roles, 65, 518–532. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9958-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fraley, C. R., Vicary, A. M., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Roisman, G. I. (2011). Patterns of stability in adult attachment: An empirical test of two models of continuity and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 974–992. doi:10.1037/a0024150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Frederick, D. A., Forbes, G. B., Grigorian, K. E., & Jarcho, J. M. (2007). The UCLA body project I: Gender and ethnic differences in self-objectification and body satisfaction among 2,206 undergraduates. Sex Roles, 57, 317–327. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9251-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gapinski, K. D., Browness, K. D., & LaFrance, M. (2003). Body objectification and “fat talk”: Effects on emotion, motivation, and cognitive performance. Sex Roles, 48, 377–388. doi:10.1023/A:1023516209973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gay, R. K., & Castano, E. (2010). My body or my mind: The impact of state and trait objectification on women’s cognitive resources. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 695–703. doi:10.1002/ejsp.731.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Greenleaf, C., & McGreer, R. (2006). Disordered eating attitudes and self-objectification among physically active and sedentary female college students. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 140, 187–198. doi:10.3200/JRLP.140.3.187-198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kozee, H. B., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00310.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Matera, C., Nerini, A., & Stefanile, C. (2013). The role of peer influences on girls’ body dissatisfaction and dieting. European Review of Applied Psychology, 63, 67–74. doi:10.1016/j.erap.2012.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    McKinley, N. M. (1998). Gender differences in undergraduates’ body esteem: The mediating effect of objectified body consciousness and actual/ideal weight discrepancy. Sex Roles, 39, 113–123. doi:10.1023/A:1018834001203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    McKinley, N. M. (1999). Women and objectified body consciousness: Mothers’ and daughters’ body experience in cultural, developmental, and familial context. Developmental Psychology, 35, 760–769. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mikulincer, M., & Nachshon, O. (1991). Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Monro, F., & Huon, G. (2005). Media-portrayed idealized images, body shame, and appearance anxiety. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 85–90. doi:10.1002/eat.20153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Morry, M., & Staska, S. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 33, 269–279. doi:10.1037/h0087148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  28. 28.

    Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A meditational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Park, L. E. (2007). Appearance-based rejection sensitivity: Implications for mental and physical health, affect, and motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 490–504. doi:10.1177/0146167206296301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Peat, C. M., & Muehlenkamp, J. J. (2011). Self-objectification, disordered eating, and depression: A test of meditational pathways. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 441–450. doi:10.1177/0361684311400389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rieves, L., & Cash, T. F. (1996). Reported social developmental factors associated with womens’ body-image attitudes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sanchez, D. T., & Broccoli, T. L. (2008). The romance of self-objectification: Does priming romantic relationships induce states of self-objectification among women? Sex Roles, 59, 545–554. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9451-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sanchez, D. T., Good, J. J., Kwang, T., & Saltzman, E. (2008). When finding a mate feels urgent: Why relationship contingency predicts men’s and women’s body shame. Social Psychology, 39, 90–102. doi:10.1027/1864-9335.39.2.90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sanchez, D. T., & Kwang, T. (2007). When the relationship becomes her: Women’s body concerns from a relationship contingency perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 401–414. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00389.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–327. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Shaver, P. R., & Clark, C. L. (1994). The psychodynamics of adult romantic attachment. In J. M. Masling & R. F. Bornstein (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on object relations theory (pp. 105–156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sharpe, T. M., Killen, J. D., Bryson, S. W., Shisslak, C. M., Estes, L. S., Gray, N., et al. (1996). Attachment style and weight concerns in preadolescent and adolescent girls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 23, 39–44. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199801)23:1<39::AID-EAT5>3.0.CO;2-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349. doi:10.1023/A:1020232714705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Tereno, S., Soares, I., Martins, C., Celani, M., & Sampio, D. (2008). Attachment styles, memories of parental rearing and therapeutic bond: A study with eating disordered patients, their parents and therapists. European Eating Disorders Review, 16, 48–58. doi:10.1002/erv.801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2010). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311. doi:10.1348/0144665031752925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Troisi, A., Di Lorenzo, G., Alcini, S., Nanni, R. C., Di Pasquale, C., & Siracusano, A. (2006). Body dissatisfaction in women with eating disorders: Relationship to early separation anxiety and insecure attachment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 449–453. doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000204923.09390.5b.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The experiences in close relationships scale (ECR)-short form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204. doi:10.1080/00223890701268041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wiseman, M. C., & Moradi, B. (2010). Body image and eating disorder symptoms in sexual minority men: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 154–166. doi:10.1037/a0018937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Zurbriggen, E. L., Ramsey, L. R., & Jaworski, B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Mary Washington, 1301 College Avenue, Fredericksburg, VA, 22401-5300, USA

    Danielle C. DeVille, Frances I. Ellmo, Wesley A. Horton & Mindy J. Erchull

Authors
  1. Danielle C. DeVille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frances I. Ellmo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wesley A. Horton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mindy J. Erchull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mindy J. Erchull.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeVille, D.C., Ellmo, F.I., Horton, W.A. et al. The Role of Romantic Attachment in Women’s Experiences of Body Surveillance and Body Shame. Gend. Issues 32, 111–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-015-9136-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Self-objectification
  • Body surveillance
  • Body shame
  • Anxious adult attachment
  • Avoidant adult attachment