Gender Issues

, Volume 29, Issue 1–4, pp 1–24 | Cite as

Misogyny: It’s Still the Law—An Empirical Assessment of the Missouri Juvenile Court System’s Processing of Rape and Robbery Offenders

  • M. Dyan McGuire
  • Steve Donner
  • Elizabeth Callahan
Original Article


Patriarchal societies have long used their legal systems as a vehicle of oppression. This article examines the extent to which bias against women can still be discerned in the content of the criminal law by comparing and contrasting Missouri’s forcible rape and robbery in the first degree statutes. The study then analyzes the application of these statutes by examining all of the forcible rape and robbery in the first degree cases processed by Missouri’s juvenile court system between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2004 (N = 617). The results of these analyses suggest that Missouri’s robbery statute is more protective of victims than is its rape statute. They also indicate that at least among juveniles, robbery offenders are sanctioned more severely than rape offenders in terms of detention, informal adjustment and adjudication.


Gender Rape Robbery Courts Criminal law 


  1. 1.
    Adelman, M., Erez, E., & Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2003). Policing violence against minority women in multicultural societies: “Community” and the politics of exclusion. Police & Society, 7, 105–133.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, M. J. (2004). The legacy of the prompt complaint requirement, corroboration requirement, and cautionary instructions on campus sexual assault. Boston University Law Review, 84, 945–1022.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L. E. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bachman, R., & Paternoster, R. (1997). Statistical methods for criminology and criminal justice. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belknap, J. (2001). The invisible woman. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bergen, R. K. (1996). Wife rape: Understanding the response of survivors and service providers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Block, S. (2006). Rape and sexual power in early America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boakye, K. E. (2009). Attitudes toward rape and victims of rape: A test of the feminist theory in Ghana. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(10), 1633–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bowermaster, J. (1998). Relocation custody disputes involving domestic violence. University of Kansas Law Review, 46(3), 433–464.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Testing for the equality of maximum likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(3), 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bryden, D. P., & Lengnick, S. (1997). Rape in the criminal justice system. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 87(4), 1194–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caputi, J. (1989). The sexual politics of murder. Gender and Society, Special Issue: Violence against Women, 3(4), 437–456.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Catalano, S. M. (2004). Criminal victimization, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Catalano, S. M. (2005). Criminal victimization, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Connerton, K. C. (1997). The resurgence of the marital rape exemption: The victimization of teens by their statutory rapists. Albany Law Review, 61, 237–284.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crooms, L. A. (1997). Speaking partial truths and preserving power: Deconstructing white supremacy, patriarchy, and the rape corroboration rule in the interest of black liberation. Howard Law Journal, 40, 459–512.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    D’Alessiono, S. J., & Stolzenberg, L. (2003). Race and the probability of arrest. Social Forces, 81(4), 1381–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    De Beauvoir, S. (1971). The second sex. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Denno, D. W. (2003). Why the model penal code’s sexual offense provisions should be pulled and replaced. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 1, 207–218.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Estrich, S. (1986). Rape. Yale Law Journal, 95, 1087–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    FBI. (2012). Attorney General Eric Holder announces revision to the uniform crime reports definition of rape. Retrieved January 6, 2012, from
  23. 23.
    Felson, R. B., & Pare, P. P. (2007). Does the criminal justice system treat domestic violence and sexual assault offenders leniently? Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 435–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Frohmann, L. (1997). Convictability and discordant locales: Reproducing race, class, and gender ideologies in prosecutorial decision making. Law & Society Review, 31(3), 531–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hawkins, D. F., Laub, J. H., Lauritsen J. L., & Cothern, L. (2000). Race, ethnicity, and serious and violent juvenile offending. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hickman, M. J., & Reaves, B. A. (2006). Local police departments, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Howerton, A. (2006). Police response to crime: Differences in the application of law by race. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 4(3), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Irving, T. (2008). Decoding black women: Policing practices and rape prosecution on the streets of Philadelphia. NWSA Journal, 20(2), 100–120.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jackson, N. (2003). Fathering injustice: Racial patriarchy and the dismantling of affirmative action. The Western Journal of Black Studies, 27(1), 51–56.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kearney, B. (2009). Symposium and notes issue of gender and sexuality law: Note: Challenges to marital unity: Spousal testimony and married women’s property acts in nineteenth-century New York. The Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, 10, 957–978.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kids Count. (2005). Interactive data center of Missouri showing economic well-being. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from
  32. 32.
    Kids Count Missouri. (2002). Interactive data center of Missouri showing percent minority. Retrieved June 8, 2010, from
  33. 33.
    Leibert, M. J., & Fox, K. C. (2005). Race and the impact of detention on juvenile justice decision making. Crime & Delinquency, 51(4), 470–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Madigan, L., & Gamble, N. (1991). The second rape: Society’s continued betrayal of the victim. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mahoney, P., & Williams, L. (1998). Sexual assault in marriage: Prevalence, consequences and treatment for wife rape. In J. Jasinski & L. M. Williams (Eds.), Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mantilla, K. (1999). Clinton a rapist?… It could happen. Off Our Backs, 29(4), 7.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Markovitz, J. (2004). Legacies of lynching. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Matoesian, G. M. (1993). Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Messerschmidt, J. W. (1998). Men victimizing men: The case of lynching 1865–1900. In L. H. Bowker (Ed.), Masculinities and violence (pp. 125–151). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Missouri Task Force. (1993). Report of the Missouri task force on gender and justice. Missouri Law Review, 58, 485–714.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mitchell, D., Angelone, D. J., Kohlberger, B., & Hirschman, R. (2009). Effects of offender motivation, victim gender, and participant gender on perceptions of rape victims and offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(9), 1564–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nakonezny, P., Shull, R., & Rodgers, J. L. (1995). The effect of no-fault divorce law on the divorce rate across the 50 states and its relation to income, education, and religiosity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(2), 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Patton, T. O., & Snyder-Yuly, J. (2007). Any four black men will do: Rape, race and the ultimate scapegoat. Journal of Black Studies, 37(6), 859–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rennison, C. M., & Rand, M. R. (2003). Criminal victimization 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Russell, D. E. H. (1990). Rape in marriage. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schloesser, P. (2002). The fair sex: White women and racial patriarchy in the early American republic. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Spears, J. W., & Spohn, C. C. (1997). The effects of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Taylor, T., Holleran, D., & Topali, V. (2009). Racial bias in case processing: Does victim race affect police clearance of violent crime incidents? Justice Quarterly, 26(3), 562–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    UCR. (2004). Crime in the United States 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    UCR. (2005). Crime in the United States 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Walker, J. T. (1999). Statistics in criminal justice: Analysis and interpretation. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Websdale, N., & Chesney-Lind, M. (1998). Doing violence to women: Research synthesis on the victimization of women. In L. H. Bowker (Ed.), Masculinities and violence (pp. 55–81). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yamawaki, N., Darby, R., & Queiroz, A. (2007). The moderating role of ambivalent sexism: The influence of power status on perception of rape victim and rapist. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Dyan McGuire
    • 1
  • Steve Donner
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Callahan
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Criminal JusticeSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Saint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Missouri Attorney General’s OfficeJefferson CityUSA

Personalised recommendations