Economic discrimination has been a major focus of gender research for the past several decades and such studies reveal a persistent gender wage gap. This study examines another aspect of the interaction between gender and the economy that has been largely ignored by social scientists—gender-based disparities in the cost of goods and services in the personal care industry. We examine prices charged for personal care products and services that are targeted toward women or men and find that women pay more than men for certain items and services. Our research suggests that although the differences are not uniform across types of services or products, women do tend to pay more than men for items such as deodorant, haircuts, and dry-cleaning. We suggest that such practices contribute to gender inequality by increasing women’s economic burden and reinforcing essentialist thinking about gender (i.e., that women and men are biologically different).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Following the release of this report, then-Mayor Rudy Giuliani signed into law a bill preventing gender discriminatory pricing practices within the city of New York .
We recognize that women’s and men’s haircuts are not identical and that hair represents major ways in which gender displays are accomplished. However, these stylistic differences are separate from the price differentials, which is the focus of this study.
We were unable to obtain information from five salons (2 no answer, 1 disconnected line, 1 no longer in business, 1 refused to give prices over the phone). In these cases an alternate salon was selected into the sample via a random number.
Some salons reported a price for a “woman’s cut and style” and a “man’s cut.” In order to account for these discrepancies, prices were recorded for just women’s and men’s cuts, excluding style, for these particular establishments. Several of these salons did not have a starting price for a women’s cut without a style. In these situations prices were recorded for the women’s cut and style and a man’s cut.
A total of eight dry cleaners were eliminated from the original sample. One of the telephone numbers proved to be a non-working number, one number was a fax machine, and another business had stopped accepting clothing for dry cleaning. The final five businesses refused to provide their prices over the telephone. Eight alternate dry cleaners were then selected, again using a list of randomly generated numbers, resulting in a final sample of 100 dry cleaning establishments.
The determination of whether a product was marketed to women or men was made by an examination of the product’s labeling (e.g., Arrid for Men) and marketing message (e.g., Degree’s men deodorant “protects men who take risks”) and/or the categorization of the store by aisle organization (physical stores) or website organization. In no cases was it unclear which products were for whom.
The cost of a women’s haircut was used to create a variable representing the type of salon, as there was a wider range of prices for women’s cuts than men’s overall.
We do know that products such as razors, body spray, deodorants and the like tend to be manufactured in countries that have relatively low wages  and therefore, the higher cost of women’s products is not likely to be based solely upon these labor costs.
Aker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4, 139–158.
Ayres, I. (2001). Untitled’ discrimination. In I. Ayres (Ed.), Pervasive prejudice? Unconventional evidence of race and gender discrimination (pp. 1–17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ayres, I., & Siegelman, P. (2001). Gender and race discrimination in retail car negotiations. In I. Ayres (Ed.), Pervasive prejudice? Unconventional evidence of race and gender discrimination (pp. 19–24). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Banks, I. (2000). Hair matters: Beauty, power, and black women’s consciousness. New York: New York University Press.
Barber, K. (2008). The well-coiffed man: Class, race, and heterosexual masculinity in the hair salon. Gender & Society, 22, 455–476.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. The Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.
Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2006). The gender pay gap: Going, going…but not gone. In D. Blau, M. C. Brinton, & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), The declining significance of gender (pp. 37–66). NY: Russell Sage.
Braeutigam, R. R. (1989). Optimal policies for natural monopolies. In R. Schmalensee & R. D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of industrial organization (Vol. II, pp. 1289–1346). NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
Budig, M. J. (2002). Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator? Social Problems, 49, 258–277.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. n.d. Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey: Household data annual averages. Retrieved November 8, 2008 (http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat3.pdf).
Ewen, S. (1990). Marketing dreams: The political elements of style. In A. Tomlinson (Ed.), Consumption, identity, and style: Marketing, meanings and the packaging of pleasure (pp. 41–56). London: Routledge.
Featherstone, M. (2001). The body in consumer culture. In J. R. Johnston (Ed.), The American body in context (pp. 79–102). Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Inc.
Furman, F. K. (1997). Facing the mirror: Older women and beauty shop culture. New York: Routledge.
Gimlin, D. (1996). Pamela’s place: Power and negotiation in the hair salon. Gender & Society, 10, 505–526.
Green, C. A., & Ferber, M. A. (2005). Detailed work histories help to explain gender and race/ethnic wage differentials? Review of Social Economy, 63, 55–85.
Gwartney, J. D., & Stroup, R. L. (1990). Microeconomics: Private and public choice. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Jantzen, C., Østergaard, P., & Vieira, C. S. (2006). Becoming a ‘woman to the backbone:’ Lingerie consumption and the experience of feminine identity. Journal of Consumer Culture, 6, 177–202.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Keat, R. (1994). Skepticism, authority and the market. In R. Keat, N. Whiteley, & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), The authority of the consumer (pp. 23–42). London: Routledge.
Keat, R., Whiteley, N., & Abercrombie, N. (1994). Introduction. In R. Keat, N. Whiteley, & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), The authority of the consumer (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge.
Kimmel, M. (2008). The gendered society (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Landsburg, S. E. (1998). Taken to the cleaners? Slate (July 3). Retrieved September 25, 2007 (http://www.slate.com/id/2050/).
Liston-Heyes, C., & Neokleous, E. (2000). Gender-based pricing in the hairdressing industry. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 107–126.
Lunt, P. K., & Livingstone, S. M. (1992). Mass consumption and personal identity: Everyday economic experience. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Martin, K. A. (1998). Becoming a gendered body: Practices of preschools. American Sociological Review, 63, 494–511.
(2010). Men win the battle of the sexes: Price differences for personal care products between men and women. Consumer Reports 75, 8–10.
Myers, G. (1996). Why women pay more. Journal of Consumer Policy, 23, 107–126.
Perlman, E. (1996). The gender gap. Governing Magazine. Retrieved December 5, 2007 (http://www.governing.com/archive/1996/jan/gender.txt).
Recent Legislation. (1996). Harvard Law Review. 109, 1839–1844.
Rivero, E. (2004). Survey reveals gender bias at salons, cleaners. The Daily News of Los Angeles, Nov. 16: B7.
Scherer, R. (1998). NYC joins fight to equalize the cost of a clean shirt. The Christian Science Monitor, 90(31), 3.
Schor, J. B. (1998). The overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer. NY: Basic Books.
Sharma, U., & Black, P. (2001). Look good, feel better: Beauty therapy as emotional labor. Sociology, 35, 913–931.
Shepard, A. (1991). Price discrimination and retail configuration. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 30–53.
Slater, D. (1997). Consumer culture and modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
(1996). The price is not right: Gender-based price discrimination in the New York City haircutting, clothing alteration and dry cleaning industries. Report to the Committee on Consumer Affairs, September 27. New York, NY: New York City Council.
Turner, B. (2003). Social fluids: Metaphors and meanings of society. Body & Society, 9, 1–10.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2006a). Highlights of women’s earnings in 2005. Retrieved September 24, 2007 (http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2005.pdf).
U.S. Department of Labor. (2006b). “International comparisons of hourly compensation costs for production workers in manufacturing,” 2005. Retrieved December 4, 2007 (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ichcc.nr0.htm).
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2007). Equal pay and compensation discrimination. Retrieved September 25, 2007, http://www.eeoc.gov/types/epa.html.
Warde, A. (1994). Consumers, identity, and belonging: Reflections on some theses of Zymunt Bauman. In R. Keat, N. Whiteley, & N. Abercrombie (Eds.), The authority of the consumer (pp. 58–74). London: Routledge.
Weitz, R. (2001). Women and their hair: Seeking power through resistance and accommodation. Gender & Society, 15, 667–686.
Weitz, R. (2004). Rapunzel’s daughters: What women’s hair tells us about women’s lives. NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing difference. Gender & Society, 9, 8–37.
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125–151.
Whittelsey, F. C. (1993). Why women pay more. Washington, DC: Center for Study of Responsive Law.
Whittelsey, F. C., & Carroll, M. (1995). Women pay more (and how to put a stop to it). Washington, DC: Center for Study of Responsive Law.
Williams, C. L. (2006). Inside Toyland: Working, shopping, and social inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
About this article
Cite this article
Duesterhaus, M., Grauerholz, L., Weichsel, R. et al. The Cost of Doing Femininity: Gendered Disparities in Pricing of Personal Care Products and Services. Gend. Issues 28, 175–191 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-011-9106-3
- Price disparities
- Doing gender
- Consumer products
- Sociology of the body