Gender Issues

, Volume 27, Issue 3–4, pp 131–145 | Cite as

Free Adult Internet Web Sites: How Prevalent Are Degrading Acts?

  • Stacy Gorman
  • Elizabeth Monk-TurnerEmail author
  • Jennifer N. Fish
Original Article


Russell (Dangerous relationships: Pornography, misogyny, and rape, 1988) argued that essential features of pornography were the inclusion of more female than male nakedness and the portrayal of men in dominant roles. Utilizing a sample of 45 Internet adult web sites, a content analysis was conducted to see if free and easily available Internet adult videos may generally be described as pornography in line with Russell’s (1988) work. A majority of videos in our sample portrayed more female than male nakedness as well as much higher representations of men in sexually dominant positions. The prevalence of violence in this sample of video and the presence of various acts (name calling, ejaculating on the face, submission, and eagerness to participate in any sex act) were also content analyzed and used to establish prevalent themes. We found a significant difference in the likelihood of a video having a theme of exploitation or domination and whether or not the video portrayed one of these acts. If the video had a theme of exploitation or domination, 92% of the videos also included a minimum of one of these acts while those videos that had themes of reciprocity or autoeroticism were significantly less likely to contain such acts. This study contributes to the literature on gender and pornography by examining issues of degradation and power relations within the context of a rapidly expanding cybersex industry.


Pornography Degradation Internet 


  1. 1.
    Barron, M., & Kimmel, M. (2000). Sexual violence in three pornographic media: Toward a sociological explanation. The Journal of Sex Research, 37, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barron, M., & Kimmel, M. (2000). Sexual violence in three pornographic media. Journal of Sex Research, May 1–25.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boies, S. (2002). University students uses of and reactions to online sexual information and entertainment: Links to online and offline sexual behavior. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11, 77–89.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buzzell, T. (2005). Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sexuality and Culture, 9, 28–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carroll, J., Padilla-Walker, L., Nelson, L., Olson, C., McNamara Barry, C., & Madsen, S. (2008). Generation XXX: Pornography acceptance and use among emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23, 6–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Check, J., & Guloien, T. (1989). Reported proclivity for coercive sex following repeated exposure to sexually violent pornography, nonviolent dehumanizing pornography, and erotica. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research advances, policy considerations (pp. 159–184). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper, A. (2004). Online sexual activity in the millennium. Contemporary Sexuality, 38, 1–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper, A., Morahan Martin, J., Mathy, R., & Maheu, M. (2002). Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 28, 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cowan, G. (1992). Feminist attitudes toward pornography control. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 166–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cowan, G., & Campbell, R. (1994). Racism and sexism in interracial pornography: A content analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cowan, G., & Dunn, K. (1994). What themes in pornography lead to perceptions of the degradation of women? The Journal of Sex Research, 31, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cowan, G., Lee, C., Levy, D., & Snyder, D. (1988). Dominance and inequality in x-rated videocassettes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davies, K. (1997). Voluntary exposure to pornography and men’s attitudes toward feminism and rape. The Journal of Sex Research, 34, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dines, G., Jensen, R., & Russo, A. (1998). Pornography: The production and consumption of inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Donnerstein, E., & Berkowitz, L. (1981). Victim reactions in aggressive erotic films as a factor of violence against women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 710–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dworkin, A. (1989). Pornography: Men possessing women. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fisher, W., & Grenier, G. (1994). Violent pornography, antiwoman thoughts, and antiwoman acts: In search of reliable effects. The Journal of Sex Research, 31, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glascock, J., & Larose, R. (1993). Dial-a-porn recordings: The role of the female participant in male sexual fantasies. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 37, 313–325.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Golde, J., Strassberg, D., Turner, C., & Lowe, K. (2000). Attitudinal effects of degrading themes and sexual explicitness in video materials. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gossett, J., & Byrne, S. (2002). Click here: A content analysis of internet rape sites. Gender and Society, 16, 689–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heider, D., & Harp, D. (2002). New hope or old power: Democracy, pornography, and the internet. The Howard Journal of Communications, 13, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jensen, R. (2007). Getting off: Pornography and the end of masculinity. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lo, V., & Wei, R. (2002). Third person effect, gender, and pornography on the internet. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 46, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    MacKinnon, C. A., & Dworkin, A. (1988). Pornography and civil rights: A new day for women’s sexuality. Minneapolis: Organizing Against Pornography.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Malamuth, N., Heim, M., & Feshbach, S. (1980). Sexual responsiveness of college students to rape depictions: Inhibitory and disinhibitory effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Matacin, M., & Burger, J. (1987). A content analysis of sexual themes in Playboy cartoons. Sex Roles, 17, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McCreadie Lillie, J. J. (2004). Cyberporn, sexuality and net apparatus. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 10, 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mehta, M., & Plaza, D. (1997). Content analysis of pornographic images available on the internet. The Information Society, 13, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paul, P. (2005). Pornified: How pornography is damaging our lives, our relationships, and our families. New York: Henry Holt and Company, LLC.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Purcell, H., & Monk-Turner, E. (1999). Sexual violence in pornography: How prevalent is it? Gender Issues, 17, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rimm, M. (1995). Marketing pornography on the information superhighway: A survey of 917, 410 images, descriptions, short stories, animations downloaded 8.5 million times by consumers in over 2000 cities in Forty Countries, Provinces, and Territories. Georgetown Law Journal, 83, 1849–1934.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ropelato, J. (n.d.). Internet Pornography Statistics. Internet Filter Review. Retrieved on November 5, 2008. (
  34. 34.
    Russell, D. (1998). Dangerous relationships: Pornography, misogyny, and rape. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Scott, J., & Cuvelier, S. (1993). Violence and sexual violence in pornography: Is it really increasing? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
    Whisnant, R. (2004). Understanding systems of prostitution. In C. Stark & R. Whisnant (Eds.), Not for sale: Feminists resisting prostitution, pornography (pp. 15–27). North Melbourne: Spinifex Press Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1982). Pornography, sexual callousness, and the trivialization of rape. Journal of Communication, 32, 10–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stacy Gorman
    • 1
  • Elizabeth Monk-Turner
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jennifer N. Fish
    • 3
  1. 1.SociologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Sociology/CJOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  3. 3.Women’s Studies and SociologyOld Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations