Gender Issues

, 26:224 | Cite as

The Relationship Between State Abortion Policies and Abortion Providers

  • Marshall H. MedoffEmail author
Original Article


This study empirically examines whether restrictive state abortion laws have an impact on the number of abortion providers over the period 1982–2005. The empirical results find that medicaid funding restrictions, parental involvement laws and targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP laws) annual licensing fees significantly deter physicians or organizations from becoming or remaining abortion providers. The numerical impact of a Medicaid funding restriction, parental involvement law and a TRAP licensing fee is to reduce the number of abortion providers per 100,000 pregnancies by 12.8, 19.6 and 15.5, respectively, as compared to states without these restrictive abortion laws. The empirical results also show that parental notification laws have a significantly larger negative impact on the number of abortion providers than parental consent laws.


Abortion State abortion policies Abortion providers 


  1. 1.
    Bitler, M., & Zavodny, M. (2001). The effect of abortion restrictions on the timing of abortions. Journal of Health Economics, 20(6), 1011–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blank, R. M., George, C. C., & London, R. A. (1996). State abortion rates: The impact of policies, providers, politics, demographics, and economic environment. Journal of Health Economics, 15(5), 513–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Erikson, R. S., Wright, G. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feminist Majority Foundation. (2000). 1999 clinical violence survey report. Arlington, VA: Feminist Majority Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Finer, L. B. (2007). Trends in premarital sex in the United States, 1954–2003. Public Health Reports, 122, 73–78.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goggin, M. L. (1993). A framework for understanding the new politics of abortion. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 1–17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guttmacher Institute. (2006). State policies in brief. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jelen, T. (1991). The political mobilization of religious beliefs. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jones, R. K., Zolna, M. R., Henshaw, S. K., & Finer, L. B. (2008). Abortion in the United States: Incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 40(1), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levine, P. B. (2003). Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 22(5), 861–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matthews, S., Ribar, D., & Wilhelm, M. (1997). The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Family Planning Perspectives, 29(2), 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medoff, M. H. (2007). Price, restrictions and abortion demand. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(1), 583–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merz, J. F., Jackson, C. A., & Klerman, J. A. (1995). A review of abortion policy: Legality, Medicaid funding and parental involvement, 1967–1994. Woman’s Right’s Law Reporter, 17(1), 1–61.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    NARAL Foundation. (1991 and various years). A state-by-state review of abortion rights. Washington, DC: NARAL Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schnell, F. (1993). The foundations of abortion attitudes: The role of values and value conflict. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 23–43). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1999, 2006). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1983, 1993, 2003). U.S. Census of Population, State reports. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsCalifornia State University, Long BeachLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations