Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intersection of Ethnicity, Gender and Class: Oriental Faculty Women in Israel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethnicity, gender and class are the major factors of social inequality and have been studied extensively leading to a large literature pertaining to each one of them. The issue of the intersection of ethnicity, gender and class has been introduced into the social sciences by feminist critical theory. Intersection theory postulates that minority groups are discriminated against on the basis of more than one characteristic which are “inextricably tied” leading to complex forms of inequality in various social domains. This study examines the intertwined effects of these factors as they are experienced and narrated by Mizrachi women (19) who are employed in universities and colleges. Although the intersection approach is generally supported by the data it was found that under certain conditions ethnicity, gender and class may be separated. One type of decomposition is when one identity encroaches upon another or others; the second is the separation of diverse identities assigning them to different life areas. These change processes do not support stereotypical dichotomies between Ashkenazi and Mizrachi, women and men and so on, and enable the creation of new hybrid identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term intersection is borrowed from set-theory in mathematics which models how regions intersect, that is physically occupying the same space. It is useful to construct a composite field that represents several parameters at once.

  2. The present study of ethnicity, gender and class in Israeli academia focuses on the individual level. The intersectionality approach is, nevertheless not limited to this level and can be applied to the analysis of groups, organizations, nations and global systems in which class, race and gender interact.

  3. The interrelations among race, class and gender have been variously described as intertwined, indivisible, entangled, inextricably tied and so on. Various metaphors have been applied to the intersection perspective comparing it to looking through a multi-focal lens, or mixed flavoring of food, or playing with an octahedron. These metaphors show how difficult it is in the social sciences to define interrelationships mainly between nominal variables.

  4. In this context I use the term ethnicity instead of race because ethnicity is used in Israel to distinguish between Oriental (Mizrachi) and Western (Ashkenazi) Jews in Israel. They are not considered to be of different races but to originate from various Jewish communities in the world.

  5. Research universities only, not including colleges.

  6. Such as, development towns in the south of the country.

  7. This is in line with the official achievement ideology in most Western democracies.

  8. An opposite process would be racialization, that is when ethnicity /race dominate other attributes; when most components of identity are looked at through a race or ethnic lens.

  9. The same method can be used in reference to other identities as well.

  10. Studies in the US show that migrants and minority members who adhere to certain traditional beliefs and habits and simultaneously adopt some of the host society's values and rules of behavior (most significantly the local language) are the most successful and satisfied.

  11. Hybridization is not the same as the much criticized ‘melting pot' policy of the Israeli government in the 1950' to ‘absorb' various Jewish immigrants coming from Eastern and Western countries and create one unified nation with a strong Western bias.

References

  1. Andersen, M. L., & Collins, H. P (Eds.). (2007). Race, Class, and Gender: An Anthology (6th ed.). United States: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture. London, Rutledge.

  3. Bhavnani, K., & Phoenix, A. (1994). Shifting identities shifting racisms. London: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Browne, I., & Mista, Y. (2003). The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, P. H. (1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypanthia, 13, 62–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crenshaw, K. (2001). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davies, K. (2008). Intersectionality as a buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9, 67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, R. A. (2000). Global Woman: Maids Nannies and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferre, Myra. (forthcoming). Inequality, Intersectionality and the Politics of Discourse: Framing Feminist Alliances.

  11. Jones, S. J. (2003). Complex subjectivities: Class, ethnicity, and race in women’s narratives of upward mobility. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 803–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ken, I. (2007). Race-class-gender theory: An image (ry) problem. Gender Issues, 4, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khazzoom, A. (2008). Shifting ethnic boundaries and inequality in Israel. CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kretsedemas, P. (2008). Redefining ‘race’ in North America. Current Sociology, 6, 826–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  16. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peres, Y., & Ben-Refael, E. (2006). Cleavages in Israeli society. Tel-Aviv: Am- Oved Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rothenberg, P. (2003). Race, Class and Gender in the United States. Bedford: W.H. Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Said, Edward. (1978). Orientalism. NY: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Toren, Nina. (2000). Hurdles in the hall of science: The Israeli case. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Toren, Nina. (2008). Ethnicity, gender and class in academia (in Hebrew). Jerusalem: Carmel Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Williams, C. (2001). The angry black woman scholar. Women’s National Studies Association Journal, 13, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Toren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toren, N. Intersection of Ethnicity, Gender and Class: Oriental Faculty Women in Israel. Gend. Issues 26, 152–166 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-009-9073-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-009-9073-0

Keywords

Navigation