Advertisement

Gender Issues

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 215–228 | Cite as

Flowers for Mom, a Tie for Dad: How Gender is Created on Mother’s and Father’s Day

  • Nicole Gilbert CoteEmail author
  • Francine M. Deutsch
Original Article

Abstract

Mother’s and Father’s Day celebrations were investigated to understand how gender is created on these two occasions. Fifty-three heterosexual couples were interviewed about family holidays. Mother’s Day was given more attention than Father’s Day. Families spent more time celebrating; they were more likely to eat out, and were more likely to celebrate with others. Mothers were also more likely to receive gifts than fathers. The gendering of the holidays was reflected in the more stereotypical gifts received on Mother’s and Father’s Day than on birthdays, and in that mothers were more likely to report relief from chores on Mother’s Day than fathers were on Father’s Day (< .01). Families in which women worked full-time and whose husbands contributed substantially to domestic labor were as likely to celebrate in gendered ways as traditional families were. These holidays reflect and promote hegemonic notions of the gendered nature of motherhood and fatherhood.

Keywords

Mother’s Day Father’s Day Motherhood Fatherhood Gender Gender construction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research and the preparation of this article were partially supported by a grant from the Harap Fund. The authors wish to thank Joseph Cohen and Elizabeth Aries for their contributions to an earlier draft and to George Cobb for statistical assistance. The authors also wish to thank Dorothy Walline for her contributions as a research assistant.

References

  1. 1.
    Arendell, T. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1192–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beaujot, R., & Andersen, R. (2007). Time-crunch: Impact of time spent in paid and unpaid work and its division in families. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 32, 295–315.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bush, G. W. (No date). “Parents’ Day 2001.” Retrieved December 14, 2006, from http://www.parentsday.com/poy2001/proclamation.htm.
  4. 4.
    Coltrane, S. (1995). The future of fatherhood: Social, demographic, and economic influences on men’s family involvements. In W. Marsiglio (Ed.), Fatherhood: Contemporary theory, research, and social policy (pp. 255–274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deutsch, F. M. (1999). Halving it all: How equally shared parenting works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deutsch, F. M., Lussier, J. B., & Servis, L. J. (1993). Husbands at home: Predictors of paternal participation in childcare and housework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1154–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    diLeonardo, M. (1987). The female world of cards and holidays: Women families, and the work of kindship. Signs, 12, 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edlund, J. (2007). The work-family time squeeze. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 48, 451–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Etzioni, A. (2000). Toward a theory of public ritual. Sociological Theory, 18, 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fair, J. E. (2004). ‘Me do wu’, My val: The creation of Valentine’s Day in Accra, Ghana. African Studies Review, 47, 23–49.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fenstermaker, S., West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Gender inequality: New conceptual terrain. In R. L. Blumberg (Ed.), Gender, family, and economy: The triple overlap (pp. 289–307). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fried, A. (1998). US environmental interest groups and the promotion of environmental values: The resounding success and failure of earth day. Environmental Politics, 7, 1–22.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gillis, J. R. (1997). A world of their making: Myth, ritual, and the quest for family values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hochschild, A. R., & Anne, M. (2003). The second shift. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishii-Kuntz, M., & Coltrane, S. (1992). Predicting the sharing of household labor: Are parenting and housework distinct? Sociological Perspectives, 35, 629–647.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Katz, E. (1998). Broadcasting holidays. Sociological Inquiry, 68(2), 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    LaRossa, R. (1997). The modernization of fatherhood: A social and political history. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    LaRossa, R., Jaret, C., Gadgil, M., & Wynn, R. G. (2000). The changing culture of fatherhood in comic-strip families: A six-decade analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Litwicki, E. M. (2000). Our hearts burn with ardent love for our two countries: Ethnicity and assimilation at Chicago holiday celebrations, 1876–1918. Journal of American Ethnic History, 19, 3–34.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McMahon, M. (1995). Engendering motherhood: Identity and self-transformation in women’s lives. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nagle, J. (2005). Everybody is Irish on St. Paddy’s: Ambivalence and alterity at London’s St. Patrick’s Day, 2002. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 12, 563–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pleck, E. (1999). The making of a domestic occasion: The history of Thanksgiving in the United States. The Journal of Social History, 32, 773–789.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schmidt, L. E. (1995). Consumer rites: The buying and selling of American holidays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Spragins, E. (2001). Love & Money; Is my mom better than yours? Retrieved on October 8, 2008 from http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A02E0DA1739F932A35754C0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&scp=22&sq=mommy%20wars%20culture%20wars&st=cse.
  28. 28.
    Walzer, S. (1996). Thinking about the baby: Gender and divisions of infant care. Social Problems, 43, 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Woollett, A., & Marshall, H. (2001). Motherhood and mothering. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 170–182). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Woolley, J T., & Peters, G. (No date). Proclamation 7015—Parents’ Day, 1997. Retrieved December 14, 2006 from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=51639.
  32. 32.
    Wright-St Clair, V., Hocking, C., Bunrayong, W., Vittayakorn, S., & Rattakorn, P. (2005). Older New Zealand women doing the work of Christmas: A recipe for identity formation. The Sociological Review, 53, 332–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMount Holyoke CollegeSouth HadleyUSA

Personalised recommendations