Abstract
This essay explores how the assumption that hierarchical position should be linked to a position-holder’s age acted as a barrier to women advancing into management positions. The close and unquestioned association between an individual’s age and what was considered an appropriate place on a bureaucratic hierarchy is one of the less often acknowledged barriers to women’s upward mobility. The study focuses on Britain in the years following the Second World War, because the increased participation of women in the workforce during the war had engendered optimism about women’s opportunities for long-term gains and advancement. Many women came out of the Second World War with a high degree of organizational capital that should have seen them advance into managerial positions. But as this study shows, through evidence gathered from archival as well as published historical documents, in the reality of the postwar world being the wrong age for the job constituted a significant barrier to women’s advancement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acton Society Trust. 1956. Management Succession: The Recruitment, Selection, Training, and Promotion of Managers, London: Actons Society Trust.
Addison, P. 1995. Now the War is Over: A Social History of Britain, 1945–51, London: Random House, originally published, 1985.
Barrett, F., &Srivastva, S. 1991. “History as a Mode of Inquiry in Organisational Life: A Role for a Human Cosmogony”, Human Relations, 44(3): 231–54.
Bernard, M., Itzin, C., Phillipson, C., & Skucha, J. (1995). “Gendered Work, Gendered Retirement”, in S. Arber & J. Ginn, eds Connecting Gender and Ageing: A Sociological Approach, Buckingham Open University Press, pp 56–68.
Bloom, U. 1944. Me—After the War: A Book for Girls Considering the Future, London: John Gifford Ltd.
Branine, M., & Glover, I. 1997. “Ageism in Work and Employment: Thinking about Connections”, Personnel Review, 26 (4): 233–46.
British Standards Institution. 1943. Office Organisation and Practice: Office Aid to the Factory, London: British Standards Institution.
Buxton, J. 1999. Ending the Mother War: Starting the Workplace Revolution, London: Panbooks, originally published 1998.
Cockburnn, C. 1991. In the Way of Women: Men's Resistance to Sex Equality in Organisations, London: MacMillan.
Copeman, G.H. 1955. Leaders of British Industry: A Study of the Careers of More Than 1,000 Company Directors, London: Gee.
Copeman, G.H. 1957. Promotion and Pay for Executives, London: Business Publications Ltd.
Crompton, R., & Jones, G. 1984. White-Collar Proletariat: Deskilling and Gender in Clerical Work, London: MacMillan.
Davies, C. 1996. “The Sociology of Professions and the Professions of Gender,” Sociology, 30(4): 661–78.
Fogarty, M., Rapoport, R., & Rapoport, R. 1971. Sex, Career, and Family: Including an International Review of Women's Roles, London: Allen and Unwin for Political and Economic Planning.
Gerth, H.H., & Wrigh Mills, C. (trans. and ed.). 1963. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York: Galaxy Books, originally published 1946.
Goffee, R., & Nicholson, N. 1994. “Career Development in Male and Female Managers—Convergence or Collapse? in M. Davidson & R. Burke, eds., Women in Management: Current Research Issues, London: Paul Chapman.
Great Britain, Department of Employment. 1975. Women and Work: A Review, Manpower paper, no. 11, London: HMSO.
Great Britain, Ministry of Labour and National Service. 1956. Careers Guide: Opportunities in the Professions and in Business Management, London: HMSO, 3rd edition.
Guerriero Wilson, R. 1998. Disillusionment or New Opportunities? The Changing Nature of Work in Offices,” Glasgow 1880–1914, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Handy, C. 1996. Beyond Certainty: The Changing World of Organizations London: Arrow Books.
Hockin, J. 1947. The Right Way to Understand How Others Get On, Kingswood Surrey: Right Way Books.
Jacques, R. 1996. Manufacturing the Employee: Management Knowledge from the Nineteenth to the Twenty-First Centuries, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
J. & P. Coats Ltd. Papers, Business Record Centre, University of Glasgow, UGD 199.
Kanter, R.M. 1993. Men and Women of the Corporation, New York: Basic Books, originally published 1977.
Leblebici, H., & Shah, N. 2004. “The Birth, Transformation, and Regeneration of Business Incubators as New Organisational Forms: Understanding the Interplay between Organisational History and Organisational Theory,” Business History, 46(3): 354–78.
Lewis, J., & Morgan, D. 1994. “Gendering Organizational Change: The Case of RELATE, 1948–1990,” Human Relations, 47(6): 641–64.
Liff, S., & Ward, K. 2001. “Distorted Views through the Glass Ceiling: The Construction of Women's Understandings of Promotion and Senior Management Positions,” Gender, Work and Organizations, 8(1): 19–36.
Myrdal, A., & Klein, V. 1956. Women's Two Roles: Home and Work, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Office Management Association Papers Modern Record Centre, University of Warwick, MSS. 337.
Office Management Association 1951. Office Management: The Tasks of Getting Things Done: An Official Report of the Office Management Association Based on Papers and Deliberations at the National Conference Held in Bournemouth during April 1951,” London: Office Management Association.
Office Management Association. 1951. Job Grading, London: Office Management Association.
Perkin, H.J. 1989. The Rise of Professional Society: England since 1880, London/New York: Routledge.
Pringle, R. 1989. Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power, and Work, London: Verso.
Rosebery, Countess of (E.J.M. Primrose) 1943. The Ambitious Girl, London: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
Rung, M.C. 1997. “Paternalism and Pink Collars: Gender and Federal Employee Relations, 1941–50,” Business History Review 71(3): 381–416.
Savage, M. 1998. “Discipline, Surveillance, and the “Career”: Employment on the Great Western Railway 1833–1914” in A. McKinlay & K. Starkey, eds., Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of the Self, London: Sage.
Schwartz, F. 1989. “Management Women and the New Facts of Life,” Harvard Business Review, 67: 65–76.
Simpson, R. 1997. “Have Times Changed? Career Barriers and the Token Woman Manager,” British Journal of Management, 8 (Special Issue): S121-S130.
Thane, P. 1991. “Towards Equal Opportunities? Women in Britain since 1945,” in T. Gourvish and A. O'Day, eds. Britain since 1945, Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 183–208.
Üsdiken, B., & A. Kieser, 2004. “Introduction: History in Organisation Studies,” Business History, 46(3) 321–30.
Wilson, F. 1995. Organizational Behaviour and Gender, London: McGraw Hill.
Wilson, J. 1995. British Business History, 1720–1994, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Yancey Martin, P. 1993. “Feminist Practice in Organizations: Implications for Management,” In Fagenson, E.A. (ed.), Women in Management: Trends, Issues, and Challenges in Managerial Diversity, London: Sage.
Yancey Martin, P. 1996. “Gendering and Evaluating Dynamics: Men, Masculinities, and Managements,” in D. Collinson and J. Hearn, eds., Men as Managers Managers as Men: Critical Perspectives on Men, Masculinities, and Management, London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
She holds an MA, MPhil, and PhD in Modern European History from Columbia University. Her current research focuses on changes in office work in the second half of the twentieth century.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, R.G. Women, age, and the managerial career in postwar Britain: Exploring the roots of the barriers to women’s opportunities in management. Gend. Issues 22, 3–19 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-005-0007-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-005-0007-1