Why do “Women’s jobs” have low pay for their educational level?
- 349 Downloads
Jobs held largely by women have low pay for the amount of education they require. Why is this? One hypothesis is that employers prefer to hire men, and all workers prefer better jobs, so that women can get in only when a job's rewards (relative to its skill requirements) are low enough that men no longer want the job. Thus, wages affect sex composition. Others see the causal arrow to run the other way. In this view, the sex composition of jobs affects the wage that employers offer; employers' biased perceptions lead them to see jobs as less important and less payworthy if they are filled largely by women. These explanations are not mutually exclusive; the causal arrow may run both ways (or neither way). In this paper we use CPS data from 1984 to 1991 and a cross-lag panel model to examine these effects. Jobs are defined with a detailed occupational category within a specific broad industry category. We find that jobs with a higher percentage of females at one point have slower wage growth (or steeper wage decline) for both men and women in the ensuing years. But we find no effect of earlier wage rate on later sex composition. For those interested in reducing gender inequality in earnings, these findings suggest the utility of “comparable worth” policies.
KeywordsAmerican Sociological Review Gender Issue Occupational Segregation Wage Penalty Percent Female
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allison, Paul. “Change Scores as Dependent Variables in Regression Analysis,” In Sociological Methodology. (Pp. 93–114.) Edited by C.C. Clogg. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
- Baron, James, and Andrew Newman, “Pay the Man: Effects of Demographic Composition on Prescribed Wage Rates in the California Civil Service,” In Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries. (Pp. 107–30.) Edited by Robert Michael, Heidi Hartmann, and Brigid O'Farrell. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
- Blau, Francine D. “Trends in the Well-Being of American Women, 1970–1995.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1998): 112–65.Google Scholar
- England, Paula. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1992.Google Scholar
- England, Paula, Karen Christopher, and Lori R. Reid. “Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Wages.” In Latinas and African American Women at Work. Edited by Irene Browne. New York: Russell Sage, 1999.Google Scholar
- Filer, Randall. “Occupational Segregation, Compensating Differentials, and Comparable Worth.” In Pay Equity. Empirical Inquiries. (Pp. 153–70.) Edited by Robert T. Michael, Heidi I. Hartmann, and Brigid O'Farrell. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
- Finkel, Steven E. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
- National Committee on Pay Equity. “The Wage Gap.” [online]. Available from World Wide Web [cited 1999]: http://www.feminist.com/wagegap/htmGoogle Scholar
- Reskin, Barbara F., and Patricia Roos. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
- Sorensen, Elaine. Comparable Worth: Is It a Worthy Policy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
- Steinberg, R. J. “Comparable Worth in Gender Studies.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes. Oxford: Cambridge University Press, Vol. 4 (2001): 2393–97.Google Scholar
- Strober, Myra H. “Toward a General Theory of Occupational Sex Segregation: The Case of Public School Teaching.” In Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. (Pp. 144–56). Edited by Barbara F. Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1984.Google Scholar
- Strober, Myra H., and Carolyn L. Arnold, “The Dynamics of Occupational Segregation Among Bank Tellers.” In Gender in the Workplace. (Pp. 107–48.) Edited by Clair Brown and Joseph A. Pechman. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1987.Google Scholar
- Strober, Myra H., and Lisa M. Catanzarite. “The Relative Attractiveness Theory of Occupational Segregation by Gender.” In Women's Employment, Special Issue of Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. (Translation from German: Labor Market and Occupational Research.) 179 (1994): 116–139.Google Scholar
- Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald. Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: the Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey: Annual Demographic File, 1983–1991 [Computer file] Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar