Advertisement

Gender Issues

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 3–22 | Cite as

Why do “Women’s jobs” have low pay for their educational level?

  • Carolyn Aman Karlin
  • Paula EnglandEmail author
  • Mary Richardson
Articles

Abstract

Jobs held largely by women have low pay for the amount of education they require. Why is this? One hypothesis is that employers prefer to hire men, and all workers prefer better jobs, so that women can get in only when a job's rewards (relative to its skill requirements) are low enough that men no longer want the job. Thus, wages affect sex composition. Others see the causal arrow to run the other way. In this view, the sex composition of jobs affects the wage that employers offer; employers' biased perceptions lead them to see jobs as less important and less payworthy if they are filled largely by women. These explanations are not mutually exclusive; the causal arrow may run both ways (or neither way). In this paper we use CPS data from 1984 to 1991 and a cross-lag panel model to examine these effects. Jobs are defined with a detailed occupational category within a specific broad industry category. We find that jobs with a higher percentage of females at one point have slower wage growth (or steeper wage decline) for both men and women in the ensuing years. But we find no effect of earlier wage rate on later sex composition. For those interested in reducing gender inequality in earnings, these findings suggest the utility of “comparable worth” policies.

Keywords

American Sociological Review Gender Issue Occupational Segregation Wage Penalty Percent Female 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison, Paul. “Change Scores as Dependent Variables in Regression Analysis,” In Sociological Methodology. (Pp. 93–114.) Edited by C.C. Clogg. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. Baron, James, and Andrew Newman, “Pay the Man: Effects of Demographic Composition on Prescribed Wage Rates in the California Civil Service,” In Pay Equity: Empirical Inquiries. (Pp. 107–30.) Edited by Robert Michael, Heidi Hartmann, and Brigid O'Farrell. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, E. M., Patrick M. Horan, and Charles M. Tolbert II. “Stratification in a Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Determination,” American Sociological Review 43 (1978): 704–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blau, Francine D. “Trends in the Well-Being of American Women, 1970–1995.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1998): 112–65.Google Scholar
  5. Budig, Michelle J., and Paula England. “The Wage Penalty for Motherhood.” American Sociological Review 66 (2001): 204–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catanzarite, Lisa. “Race-Gender Composition and Occupational Pay Degradation.” Social Problems 50 (2003): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coverdill, James E. “The Dual Economy and Sex Differences in Earnings.” Social Forces 66, no. 4 (1988): 970–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. England, Paula. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1992.Google Scholar
  9. England, Paula, Karen Christopher, and Lori R. Reid. “Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Wages.” In Latinas and African American Women at Work. Edited by Irene Browne. New York: Russell Sage, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. England, Paula, George Farkas, Barbara Stanek Kilbourne, and Thomas Dou. “Explaining Occupational Sex Segregation and Wages: Findings from a Model with Fixed Effects.” American Sociological Review 53 (1988): 544–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Filer, Randall. “Male-Female Wage Differences: The Importance of Compensating Differentials.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 38, no. 3 (1985): 426–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Filer, Randall. “Occupational Segregation, Compensating Differentials, and Comparable Worth.” In Pay Equity. Empirical Inquiries. (Pp. 153–70.) Edited by Robert T. Michael, Heidi I. Hartmann, and Brigid O'Farrell. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  13. Filer, Randall. “Compensating Differentials and the Male-Female Wage Gap: A Comment.” Social Forces 69, no. 2 (1990): 469–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finkel, Steven E. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
  15. Hodson, Randy, and Paula England. “Industrial Structure and Sex Differences in Earnings.” Industrial Relations 25, no. 1 (1986): 16–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobs, Jerry A., and Ronnie J. Steinberg. “Compensating Differentials and the Male-Female Wage Gap: Evidence from the New York State Comparable Worth Study.” Social Forces 69, no. 2, (1990): 439–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobs, Jerry A., and Ronnie J. Steinberg. “Compensating Differentials and the Male-Female Wage Gap: A Reply.” Social Forces 69, no. 2, (1990): 439–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kilbourne, Barbara, Paula England, George Farkas, Kurt Beron, and Dorothea Weir. “Returns to Skills, Compensating Differentials, and Gender Bias: Effects of Occupational Characteristics on the Wages of White Women and Men.” American Journal of Sociology 100 (1994): 689–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kmec, Julie A. “Minority Job Concentration and Wages,” Social Problems 50 (2003): 38–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Macpherson, David A., and Barry T. Hirsch. “Wages and Gender Composition: Why Do Women's Jobs Pay Less?” Journal of Labor Economics 13, no. 3m (1995): 426–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Committee on Pay Equity. “The Wage Gap.” [online]. Available from World Wide Web [cited 1999]: http://www.feminist.com/wagegap/htmGoogle Scholar
  22. Petersen, Trond, and Laurie A. Morgan. “Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap.” American Journal of Sociology 101, no. 2, (1995): 329–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Alison Davis-Blake. “The Effect of the Proportion of Women on Salaries: The Case of College Administrators.” Administrative Science Quarterly 32 (1987): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reskin, Barbara F., and Patricia Roos. Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  25. Snyder, David, and Paula M. Hudis. “Occupational Income and the Effects of Minority Competition and Segregation: A Reanalysis and Some New Evidence.” American Sociological Review 41 (1976): 209–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sorensen, Elaine. Comparable Worth: Is It a Worthy Policy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. Steinberg, R. J. “Comparable Worth in Gender Studies.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes. Oxford: Cambridge University Press, Vol. 4 (2001): 2393–97.Google Scholar
  28. Strober, Myra H. “Toward a General Theory of Occupational Sex Segregation: The Case of Public School Teaching.” In Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. (Pp. 144–56). Edited by Barbara F. Reskin. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  29. Strober, Myra H., and Carolyn L. Arnold, “The Dynamics of Occupational Segregation Among Bank Tellers.” In Gender in the Workplace. (Pp. 107–48.) Edited by Clair Brown and Joseph A. Pechman. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1987.Google Scholar
  30. Strober, Myra H., and Lisa M. Catanzarite. “The Relative Attractiveness Theory of Occupational Segregation by Gender.” In Women's Employment, Special Issue of Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. (Translation from German: Labor Market and Occupational Research.) 179 (1994): 116–139.Google Scholar
  31. Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald. Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: the Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  32. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Current Population Survey: Annual Demographic File, 1983–1991 [Computer file] Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  33. Wellington, Allison J. “Changes in the Male-Female Wage Gap, 1976–1985.” Journal of Human Resources 28 (1993): 383–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wellington, Allison J. “Accounting for the Male/Female Wage Gap Among Whites: 1976 and 1985.” American Sociological Review 59 (1994): 839–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright, Rosemary and Jerry A. Jacobs. “Male Flight from Computer Work: A New Look at Occupational Resegregation and Ghettoization.” American Sociological Review 59 (1994): 511–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn Aman Karlin
  • Paula England
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mary Richardson
  1. 1.Department of SociologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanston

Personalised recommendations